Literature DB >> 31512453

[Comparative study on effectiveness of intermittent suture versus cosmetic suture in total knee arthroplasty].

Shuiqing Hu1, Liang Chen1, Min Zeng1, Jie Xie1, Yihe Hu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the intermittent suture and the cosmetic suture in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: A clinical data of 48 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent initial TKA between January 2017 and April 2018, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 23 patients underwent intermittent suture (group A) and 25 patients underwent cosmetic suture (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, degrees of varus and valgus deformities, knee society score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in serum before operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). KSS scores at 1 and 6 months after operation were used to assess the knee function. VAS scores at 1, 3, and 5 days after operation were used to assess the pain degree of knee. Levels of IL-6, PCT, CRP, and ESR in serum at 1 day and 1 month after operation were recorded to evaluate the risk of periprosthetic infection. Likert score at 6 months after operation was used to evaluate the satisfaction of incision. The hospitalization time after operation was also recorded.
RESULTS: All patients were followed up 7- 17 months (mean, 11.3 months). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time after operation between two groups ( t=-1.907, P=0.063). The Likert score in group A was significantly lower than that in group B ( t=-2.196, P=0.033). The VAS score, KSS clinical score and KSS functional score at different time points after operation were significantly better than those before operation in two groups ( P<0.05). The VAS score at 5 days after operation was better than that at 1 day after operation in two groups, and the KSS clinical score and KSS functional score at 6 months after operation were better than those at 1 month after operation in two groups, all showing significant differences ( P<0.05). The VAS scores at 3 and 5 days after operation were significantly lower in group B than in group A ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in VAS score and KSS scores between two groups at other time points after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of IL-6, PCT, CRP, and ESR between the two groups at different time points after operation ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Cosmetic suture is superior to intermittent suture in incision appearance and pain management, but there is no significant difference in short-term joint function and risk of periprosthetic infection after TKA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total knee arthroplasty; cosmetic suture; incision suture; intermittent suture; periprosthetic joint infection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512453      PMCID: PMC8355840          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201811066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Research progress of knee-salvage treatment for knee osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Baofeng Guo; Sihe Qin; Ye Huang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2018-10-15

2.  Biomechanical proof of barbed sutures for the efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Bastian Amend; Otto Müller; Jens Bedke; Ulf Leichtle; Udo Nagele; Stephan Kruck; Arnulf Stenzl; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Barbed sutures in total knee arthroplasty: are these safe, efficacious, and cost-effective?

Authors:  Aditya V Maheshwari; Qais Naziri; Andy Wong; Ivan Burko; Michael A Mont; Vijay J Rasquinha
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Water-tight knee arthrotomy closure: comparison of a novel single bidirectional barbed self-retaining running suture versus conventional interrupted sutures.

Authors:  Michael Nett; Rui Avelar; Michael Sheehan; Fred Cushner
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions.

Authors:  Venkat Boddapati; Michael C Fu; David J Mayman; Edwin P Su; Peter K Sculco; Alexander S McLawhorn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection before revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kun Yuan; Wei-Dong Li; Ying Qiang; Zhi-Ming Cui
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  [Mid-term therapeutic effect analysis of cementless total knee arthroplasty without patella replacement].

Authors:  Xinghuo Zhang; A T Wild; Zhenshan Yu; Yakui Zhang; Houshan Lv
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2008-06

8.  Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric L Smith; Steven T DiSegna; Pinak Y Shukla; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection Does Not Preclude Good Outcomes after a Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 144 Retrospective Cases.

Authors:  Du Hyun Ro; Jong-Keun Kim; Sunghwan Kim; Hyuk-Soo Han; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Early serum procalcitonin level after primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  Samy Bouaicha; Samuel Blatter; Beat K Moor; Katharina Spanaus; Claudio Dora; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.