Literature DB >> 31512446

[A comparative study of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via transtibial and transportal techniques].

Lei Zhang1, Bo Jiang2, Jin Sun2, Jia Ma2, Sheng Zhang2, Xiaohua Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via transtibial (TT) and transportal (TP) techniques after 10 years follow-up.
METHODS: A clinical data of 103 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a single bundle of autologous hamstring tendon between March 2006 and March 2009 was retrospectively analyzed, among which 57 patients were reconstructed with TT technique (TT group) and 46 patients were reconstructed with TP technique (TP group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, interval between injury and operation, preoperative pivot shift test, preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and KT-2000 side-to-side difference (SSD) between the two groups ( P>0.05). At 10 years after operation, Lachman test was used to evaluate the forward joint stability and pivot shift test to evaluate the rotational stability of the knee; KT-2000 SSD was used to measure tibial anterior displacement; IKDC score and Lysholm score were used to evaluate knee function; MRI examination was performed to observe graft healing and measure coronal inclination angles of the tibia and femoral tunnels. The rate of return to sports was also calculated.
RESULTS: The incisions healed by first intention in the two groups, and no early complication occurred after operation. All patients were followed up 10-13 years, with an average of 11.5 years. During the follow-up period, there was no limitation of knee extension and flexion, no discomfort of donor site or graft failure in either group. MRI examination showed that the graft healed well. The IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KT-2000 SSD in the two groups were significantly improved after 10 years ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 10 years after operation ( P>0.05). There were significant differences in coronal inclination angles of femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel between the two groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Lachman test and pivot shift test between the two groups ( P>0.05). The rate of return to sports of patients was 61.40% (35/57) in TT group and 63.04% (29/46) in TP group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( χ 2=0.29, P=0.87).
CONCLUSION: TT and TP techniques can both achieve good effectiveness in ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; transportal technique; transtibial technique

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512446      PMCID: PMC8355841          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  24 in total

1.  Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study.

Authors:  M P Arnold; J Kooloos; A van Kampen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.

Authors:  John C Loh; Yukihisa Fukuda; Eiichi Tsuda; Richard J Steadman; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Recreating an acceptable angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using external landmarks.

Authors:  Anikar Chhabra; David R Diduch; Peter B Blessey; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint.

Authors:  Hemanth R Gadikota; Jae Ang Sim; Ali Hosseini; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Jens Dargel; Rüdiger Schmidt-Wiethoff; Sören Fischer; Konrad Mader; Jürgen Koebke; Thomas Schneider
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques.

Authors:  Ermias S Abebe; C T Moorman; T Scott Dziedzic; Charles E Spritzer; R Lee Cothran; Dean C Taylor; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Anteromedial Portal Drilling Yielded Better Survivorship of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions When Comparing Recent Versus Early Surgeries With This Technique.

Authors:  Niclas Højgaard Eysturoy; Torsten G Nielsen; Martin C Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mohsen Hussein; Carola F van Eck; Andrej Cretnik; Dejan Dinevski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knee during walking.

Authors:  Anastasios D Georgoulis; Anastasios Papadonikolakis; Christos D Papageorgiou; Argyris Mitsou; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Tibiofemoral joint contact area and stress after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling techniques.

Authors:  Chunhui Liu; Yingpeng Wang; Zhongli Li; Ji Li; Hao Zhang; Yangmu Fu; Kuan Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Clinical Treatment of Joint Complications and CT Observation.

Authors:  Cheng Ji; Yuan Chen; Liulong Zhu; Jian Zhang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.