Literature DB >> 31512109

Retrospective Analysis of Bioanalytical Method Validation Approaches in Biosimilar Biological Product Development.

O N Obianom1, Theingi M Thway2, S J Schrieber3, O O Okusanya1, Y M Wang1, S M Huang1, I Zineh1.   

Abstract

Development and validation of a bioanalytical method for biosimilar biological product development (BPD) can be challenging. It requires the development of a bioanalytical method that reliably and accurately measures both proposed biosimilar and reference products in a biological matrix. This survey summarizes the current state of bioanalysis in BPD. Bioanalytical data from 28 biosimilar biologic license applications submitted to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up to December 2018 were analyzed. The aim of the analysis was to provide (i) a summary of the bioanalytical landscape for BPD, (ii) a cumulative review of bioanalytical method validation approaches to aid in understanding how a specific method was selected, and (iii) a summary of data regarding bioanalytical bias differences between products. Results show diversity of the bioanalytical approaches used, as well as the observed differences in bioanalytical bias. Our findings highlight the need for understanding the critical aspects of BPD bioanalysis and clarifying BPD bioanalytical best practices, which could help ensure consistent method validation approaches in the BPD community.

Keywords:  351(k) BLAs; Bioanalytical method comparability; Biosimilar bioanalysis; Therapeutic biologics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512109     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0376-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ligand binding assays in the 21st century laboratory: recommendations for characterization and supply of critical reagents.

Authors:  Denise M O'Hara; Valerie Theobald; Adrienne Clements Egan; Joel Usansky; Murli Krishna; Julie TerWee; Mauricio Maia; Frank P Spriggs; John Kenney; Afshin Safavi; Jeannine Keefe
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Fundamentals of large-molecule protein therapeutic bioanalysis using ligand-binding assays.

Authors:  Theingi M Thway
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Applications of a planar electrochemiluminescence platform to support regulated studies of macromolecules: benefits and limitations in assay range.

Authors:  Theingi Thway; Chris Macaraeg; Dominador Calamba; Vimal Patel; Jennifer Tsoi; Mark Ma; Jean Lee; Binodh Desilva
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  Challenges in bioanalytical assays for biosimilars.

Authors:  Xun Wang; LingSing Chen
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  In Silico Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Bioanalytical Bias Difference between Two Therapeutic Protein Formulations for Pharmacokinetic Assessment in a Biocomparability Study.

Authors:  Theingi M Thway; Chris Macaraeg; Michael Eschenberg; Mark Ma
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Role of Modeling and Simulation in the Development of Novel and Biosimilar Therapeutic Proteins.

Authors:  Yow-Ming C Wang; Yaning Wang; Sarah J Schrieber; Justin Earp; Theingi M Thway; Shiew Mei Huang; Issam Zineh; Leah Christl
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Bioanalytical challenges of biosimilars.

Authors:  Rafiq Islam
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Systematic verification of bioanalytical similarity between a biosimilar and a reference biotherapeutic: committee recommendations for the development and validation of a single ligand-binding assay to support pharmacokinetic assessments.

Authors:  Joseph C Marini; Michael Anderson; Xiao-Yan Cai; John Chappell; Todd Coffey; Dominique Gouty; Aparna Kasinath; Vera Koppenburg; Philip Oldfield; Shannon Rebarchak; Ronald R Bowsher
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.009

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Current Perspectives on Ligand-Binding Assay Practices in the Quantification of Circulating Therapeutic Proteins for Biosimilar Biological Product Development.

Authors:  T M Thway; Y M Wang; B P Booth; K Maxfield; S M Huang; I Zineh
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Safety of Intravitreal Injection of Biosimilar of Aflibercept in Rabbit Eyes.

Authors:  Alireza Lashay; Hamid Riazi-Esfahani; Hooshang Faghihi; Ahmad Mirshahi; Hassan Khojasteh; Alireza Khodabande; Fahimeh Asadi Amoli; Fariba Ghassemi; Fatemeh Bazvand; Elias Khalili Pour; Nazanin Ebrahimiadib; Ali Torkashvand; Elham Delrish
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 1.909

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.