Literature DB >> 31512086

A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population.

Jenny Cleland1, Claire Hutchinson1, Jyoti Khadka1,2, Rachel Milte1, Julie Ratcliffe3.   

Abstract

Older people (aged 65 years and over) are the fastest growing age cohort in the majority of developed countries, and the proportion of individuals defined as the oldest old (aged 80 years and over) living with physical frailty and cognitive impairment is rising. These population changes put increasing pressure on health and aged care services, thus it is important to assess the cost effectiveness of interventions targeted for older people across health and aged care sectors to identify interventions with the strongest capacity to enhance older peoples' quality of life and provide value for money. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of economic evaluation that typically uses preference-based instruments to measure and value health-related quality of life for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYS) to enable comparisons of the cost effectiveness of different interventions. A variety of generic preference-based instruments have been used to measure older people's quality of life, including the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT); Health Utility Index Mark 2 (HUI2); Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3); Short-Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D); Assessment of Quality of Life-6 dimensions (AQoL-6D); Assessment of Quality of Life-8 dimensions (AQoL-8D); Quality of Wellbeing Scale-Self-Administered (QWB-SA); 15 Dimensions (15D); EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D); and an older person specific preference-based instrument-the Investigating Choice Experiments Capability Measure for older people (ICECAP-O). This article reviews the development and application of these instruments within the older population and discusses the issues surrounding their use with this population. Areas for further research relating to the development and application of generic preference-based instruments with populations of older people are also highlighted.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512086     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00512-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  8 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness and health-related quality of life of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation therapy alone in elderly head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Tanja Sprave; Vivek Verma; Alexander Fabian; Alexander Rühle; Dimos Baltas; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in populations with a mean age of ≥ 75 years: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sophie Gottschalk; Hans-Helmut König; Mona Nejad; Judith Dams
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.440

3.  Systematic review of 29 self-report instruments for assessing quality of life in older adults receiving aged care services.

Authors:  Joyce Siette; Gilbert Thomas Knaggs; Yvonne Zurynski; Julie Ratcliffe; Laura Dodds; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The integration of mixed methods data to develop the quality of life - aged care consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument.

Authors:  Claire Hutchinson; Julie Ratcliffe; Jenny Cleland; Ruth Walker; Rachel Milte; Candice McBain; Megan Corlis; Victoria Cornell; Jyoti Khadka
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Stem Cell injections for symptomatic relief and strUctural improvement in people with Tibiofemoral knee OsteoaRthritis: protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial (the SCUlpTOR trial).

Authors:  Xiaoqian Liu; Sarah Robbins; Xia Wang; Sonika Virk; Karen Schuck; Leticia A Deveza; Win Min Oo; Kirsty Carmichael; Benny Antony; Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth; Christopher Little; James Linklater; Anthony Harris; David Humphries; R O'Connell; Gillian Heller; Thomas Buttel; Stefan Lohmander; Changhai Ding; David J Hunter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Feasibility of the EQ-5D in the elderly population: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ole Marten; Laura Brand; Wolfgang Greiner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.440

7.  Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Julie Ratcliffe; Siobhan Bourke; Jinhu Li; Brendan Mulhern; Claire Hutchinson; Jyoti Khadka; Rachel Milte; Emily Lancsar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.558

8.  Developing dimensions for a new preference-based quality of life instrument for older people receiving aged care services in the community.

Authors:  Jenny Cleland; Claire Hutchinson; Candice McBain; Ruth Walker; Rachel Milte; Jyoti Khadka; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.440

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.