Literature DB >> 31512081

Is surgery alone sufficient for treating T1 gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastases?

Masahiro Yura1, Takaki Yoshikawa2, Sho Otsuki1, Yukinori Yamagata1, Shinji Morita1, Hitoshi Katai1, Toshirou Nishida1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether or not surgery alone is sufficient for treating patients with pathological stage T1N2M0 (Stage IIA), T1N3a/bM0 (Stage IIB/IIIB), and T3N0M0 (Stage IIA) gastric cancer who were not indicated for adjuvant treatment according to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guideline remains unclear.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 236 patients who had been diagnosed with pT1N2-3b/pT3N0 gastric cancer and undergone R0 gastrectomy with lymph node dissection between January 2000 and December 2012 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.
RESULTS: The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the patients with pathological (p) T1N2-3b and T3N0 cancer were 73.9% (63.1-84.7) and 89.5% (84.0-95.0), respectively. The only significant prognostic factors for the survival identified by a multivariate Cox regression analysis in patients with pT1N2-3 cancer were the pN stage (N3a/N2: hazard ratio [HR] 2.940, 95% CI 1.314-5.577; N3b/N2: HR 8.688, 95% CI 3.096-24.382) and tumor diameter (<30/ ≥ 30 mm) (HR 2.919; 95% CI 1.351-6.304). We divided the patients with pT1N2-3 gastric cancer into 3 risk categories (high, moderate, low) using these 2 significant prognostic factors and found that the 5-year RFS rates were significantly different among the 3 risk groups (low risk, 93.0%; moderate risk, 66.7%; high risk, 25.0%; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: pT3N0 and large pT1N2 with a diameter ≥ 30 mm had an excellent prognosis, while pT1N2-3 with at least N3a/b or a tumor diameter < 30 mm showed a relatively poor prognosis. These patients may be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; Gastric cancer; T1 tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512081     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-01006-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  12 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of tumor size in T3 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaowen Liu; Yu Xu; Ziwen Long; Huiyan Zhu; Yanong Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Effect of very small tumor size on cancer-specific mortality in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Wo; Kun Chen; Bridget A Neville; Nancy U Lin; Rinaa S Punglia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Adjuvant mitomycin and fluorouracil followed by oral uracil plus tegafur in serosa-negative gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group.

Authors:  T Nakajima; A Nashimoto; M Kitamura; T Kito; T Iwanaga; K Okabayashi; M Goto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Exploratory Analysis to Find Unfavorable Subset of Stage II Gastric Cancer for Which Surgery Alone Is the Standard Treatment; Another Target for Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Takaki Yoshikawa; Hirohito Fujikawa; Tsutomu Hayashi; Takashi Ogata; Haruhiko Cho; Takanobu Yamada; Shinichi Hasegawa; Kazuhito Tsuchida; Norio Yukawa; Takashi Oshima; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

5.  Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project.

Authors:  Takeshi Sano; Daniel G Coit; Hyung Ho Kim; Franco Roviello; Paulo Kassab; Christian Wittekind; Yuko Yamamoto; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Macroscopic tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Tomohiro Osaki; Daiki Murakami; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Shotaro Oro; Shigeru Tatebe; Shunichi Tsujitani; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Mitsuru Sasako; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Taira Kinoshita; Masashi Fujii; Atsushi Nashimoto; Hiroshi Furukawa; Toshifusa Nakajima; Yasuo Ohashi; Hiroshi Imamura; Masayuki Higashino; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Akira Kurita; Kuniyoshi Arai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Association Between Very Small Tumor Size and Decreased Overall Survival in Node-Positive Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Vinayak Muralidhar; Ryan D Nipp; Harvey J Mamon; Rinaa S Punglia; Theodore S Hong; Cristina Ferrone; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Aparna Parikh; Paul L Nguyen; Jennifer Y Wo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry.

Authors:  Atsushi Nashimoto; Kohei Akazawa; Yoh Isobe; Isao Miyashiro; Hitoshi Katai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yasuyuki Seto; Hiroshi Furukawa; Ichiro Oda; Hiroyuki Ono; Satoshi Tanabe; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.370

View more
  7 in total

1.  Indications for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pT1N1M0 gastric cancer: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Peng Jin; Xiaoyan Ji; Shuai Ma; Wenzhe Kang; Hao Liu; Yang Li; Fuhai Ma; Haitao Hu; Weikun Li; Yantao Tian
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Shizuki Sugita; Takahiro Kinoshita; Takeshi Kuwata; Masanori Tokunaga; Akio Kaito; Masahiro Watanabe; Akiko Tonouchi; Reo Sato; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of metastasis between early-onset and late-onset gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qiang-Ping Zhou; Yong-Hua Ge; Cheng-Yuan Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Prognostic analysis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study and competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Tao Tang; Youxiang Chen; Chunyan Zeng
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Higher Lymph Node Metastasis Rate and Poorer Prognosis of Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancer Compared to Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer in Early-Onset Early-Stage Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chao-Tao Tang; Si-Hai Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Nomograms predicting prognosis of patients with pathological stages T1N2-3 and T3N0 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Fei Wang; Xin Yin; Tian-Yi Fang; Yi-Min Wang; Dao-Xu Zhang; Yao Zhang; Xi-Bo Wang; Hao Wang; Ying-Wei Xue
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-02-27

7.  Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Nonmetastatic Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Xiaomei Li; Zhiwei Chen; Jing Lin; Shouan Wang; Conghua Song
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.