Literature DB >> 31511952

Clinical experience with combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments of the knee in sportsmen.

Evgeniy Nikolaevich Goncharov1,2, Oleg Aleksandrovich Koval3, Vadim Erikovich Dubrov4, Eduard Nikolaevich Bezuglov5, Anastasiya Mikhaylovna Filimonova2,6, Nikolay Gavriilovich Goncharov1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common sports injuries of the knee joint. Today, we have a large number of approaches to arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament that lead to successful outcomes and allow the patients to return to a significant level of activity post-operatively. Nevertheless, the return to competitions rate stays relatively low. The functional state is thought to be dependent on rotational and anteroposterior stability of the knee. These data encourage search for methods of additional stabilization of the knee joint, one of them being extra-articular tenodesis, or reconstruction of anterolateral ligament of the knee. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate medium-term results of combined simultaneous arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament of the knee joint in sportsmen and to access the probability of return to competitions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surgeries were performed in 2014-2015 in 50 patients who fulfilled the entry criteria: 20 patients (including 10 professional sportsmen) underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction together with reconstruction of anterolateral ligament-group 1 (main group), and 30 patients (including 10 professional sportsmen) underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction-group 2 (control group).
RESULTS: Group 1: All patients of group 1 were able to return to the pre-operative sports level in two years after the surgery. The mean Tegner Lysholm score was 72.6 ± 6.45 (hereinafter, SE-standard error) before the surgery and 97.4 ± 1.18 after the surgery. The mean IKDC score was 63.1 ± 4.8% before the surgery and 96.3 ± 1.8% after the surgery. Group 2: 20 of 30 patients (66.7%) returned to the pre-operative level of activity and returned to competitions (if they were professional sportsmen) in a year after the surgery. Five of ten patients (50%) (professional sportsmen) returned to competitions. Fifteen of 20 patients (75%) (amateur sportsmen) also returned to competitions. The mean pre-operative Tegner Lysholm score was 69.6 ± 3.5, and the mean post-operative score was 92.1 ± 3.9. The mean pre-operative IKDC score was 73.4 ± 3.2%, and the mean post-operative score was 90.3 ± 3.7%.
CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that more patients with higher functional demands and more professional sportsmen returned to sports. Despite the results of our and other foreign studies, a need remains for studies that will compare outcomes of ALL reconstruction with the same surgical technique in homogenous groups of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterolateral ligament; Back to sport; Knee instability; Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction of anterolateral ligament; Sport

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31511952     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04409-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Joshua G Schkrohowsky; Zachary M Working; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Combined anterolateral ligament and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Authors:  James O Smith; Sam K Yasen; Breck Lord; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Combined Intra- and Extra-articular Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: The Reconstruction of the Knee Anterolateral Ligament.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Roberto Freire da Mota E Albuquerque; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 4.  The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years.

Authors:  Pierre Chambat; Christian Guier; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Jean-Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Jeff R S Leiter; Robert Gourlay; Sheila McRae; Nevin de Korompay; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The Segond fracture: a bony injury of the anterolateral ligament of the knee.

Authors:  Steven Claes; Thomas Luyckx; Evie Vereecke; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Combined Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Stefan Mogos; Bogdan Sendrea; Ioan Cristian Stoica
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2017-01

8.  The Involvement of the Anterolateral Ligament in Rotational Control of the Knee.

Authors:  Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Christian Lutz; Matt Daggett; François Dalmay; Benjamin Freychet; Lucas Niglis; Pierre Imbert
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery.

Authors:  Håkan Jonsson; Katrine Riklund-Ahlström; Jonas Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-10

10.  The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael W Mariscalco; David C Flanigan; Joshua Mitchell; Angela D Pedroza; Morgan H Jones; Jack T Andrish; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eoghan T Hurley; David A Bloom; Alexander Hoberman; Utkarsh Anil; Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas; Eric J Strauss; Michael J Alaia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A Review of Current Concepts of the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee.

Authors:  Vasileios Athanasiou; Andreas Panagopoulos; Antonios Kouzelis; Zinon T Kokkalis; John Lakoumentas; Konstantinos Katsanos; John Gliatis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 3.  Clinical Outcomes of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Combined With Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo-Ram Na; Woo-Kyoung Kwak; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-13

4.  Clinical and mechanical outcomes in isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Nikhil Agarwal; Jaibaji Monketh; Andrea Volpin
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 5.  Graft choices for anterolateral ligament knee reconstruction surgery: Current concepts.

Authors:  Byron Chalidis; Charalampos Pitsilos; Dimitrios Kitridis; Panagiotis Givissis
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.534

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.