| Literature DB >> 31511496 |
Paola Matarrese1, Paolo Tieri2,3, Stefano Salvioli4,5, Anna Ruggieri6, Simona Anticoli1, Barbara Ascione1, Maria Conte7,8, Claudio Franceschi9,10, Walter Malorni1,11.
Abstract
Sex dimorphism in cell response to stress has previously been investigated by different research groups. This dimorphism could be at least in part accounted for by sex-biased expression of regulatory elements such as microRNAs (miRs). In order to spot previously unknown miR expression differences we took advantage of prior knowledge on specialized databases to identify X chromosome-encoded miRs potentially escaping X chromosome inactivation (XCI). MiR-548am-5p emerged as potentially XCI escaper and was experimentally verified to be significantly up-regulated in human XX primary dermal fibroblasts (DFs) compared to XY ones. Accordingly, miR-548am-5p target mRNAs, e.g. the transcript for Bax, was differently modulated in XX and XY DFs. Functional analyses indicated that XY DFs were more prone to mitochondria-mediated apoptosis than XX ones. Experimentally induced overexpression of miR548am-5p in XY cells by lentivirus vector transduction decreased apoptosis susceptibility, whereas its down-regulation in XX cells enhanced apoptosis susceptibility. These data indicate that this approach could be used to identify previously unreported sex-biased differences in miR expression and that a miR identified with this approach, miR548am-5p, can account for sex-dependent differences observed in the susceptibility to mitochondrial apoptosis of human DFs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31511496 PMCID: PMC6739406 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-1888-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Death Dis Impact factor: 8.469
Escaper genes hosting an miRNA in their locus
| Gene | miRNA |
|---|---|
| CSF2RA | hsa-miR-3690 |
|
|
|
| GABRE | hsa-miR-224 |
| GABRE | hsa-miR-452 |
| HTR2C | hsa-miR-1264 |
| HTR2C | hsa-miR-1298 |
| HTR2C | hsa-miR-1911 |
| HTR2C | hsa-miR-1912 |
| HTR2C | hsa-miR-448 |
| HTR2C | hsa-miR-764 |
|
|
|
| VGLL1 | hsa-miR-934 |
Gene names, alphabetical order; black: escaper in Cotton et al.[30] (2013); bold: escaper in Carrel and Willard[26]; italics: escaper in both datasets
Fig. 1a Left panel: Expression level of the selected microRNAs in XX and XY DFs as quantitatively measured by qRT-PCR. The values of fold increase were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method for each sample relative to the overall female or male samples mean. The fold increase values were obtained from eight female and eight male donors estimated in two independent quantitation reactions, with triplicate wells for each sample and for each microRNA. Right panel: Cytofluorimetric analysis of APAF1, Bcl-xL, and XIAP expression level in DFs isolated from eight male and eight female healthy donors obtained in three independent measures performed in each donor and reported as mean ± SD of the median fluorescence intensity. No statistically significant differences were evident between male and female DFs. b Left panel: Cytofluorimetric analysis of Bax and Bcl-2 expression level in DFs isolated from eight male and eight female (right panel) healthy donors obtained in three independent measures performed in each donor and reported as mean ± SD of the median fluorescence intensity. Central panel: Dot plots obtained in two representative XY and XX DFs after double cell staining with Bax and Bcl-2 specific antibodies. Right panel: Bar graph showing the ratio Bax/Bcl-2 obtained by pooling together measures acquired in DFs isolated from all the male or female donors. c Left panel: Bar graph showing a representative flow cytometric evaluation, performed by using MitoSOX-red, of mitochondrial ROS production in DFs isolated from eight male and eight female healthy donors. Central panel: Bar graph showing mitochondrial ROS production obtained by pooling together measures acquired in DFs isolated from all the male or female donors and reported as mean ± SD of the median fluorescence intensity. Right panels: Cytofluorimetric histograms of mitochondrial ROS evaluation obtained in two representative male and female DFs. d Left panel: Bar graph showing a representative flow cytometric evaluation, performed by using TMRM, of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in DFs isolated from eight male and eight female healthy donors. Central panel: Bar graph showing MMP obtained by pooling together measures acquired in DFs isolated from all the male or female donors and reported as mean ± SD of the median fluorescence intensity. Right panels: Cytofluorimetric histograms of MMP evaluation obtained in two representative XY and XX DFs. Black columns XY DFs; gray columns XX DFs. *p < 0.01 between XY and XX DFs
Fig. 2a Left panel: Bar graph showing flow cytometry analysis after staining with Annexin V-APC obtained in DFs isolated from eight male and eight female healthy donors reported as means ± SD. Right panel: Flow cytometry histograms of apoptosis evaluation obtained in one representative cell line of XY and XX DFs. Numbers represent the percentages of Annexin V-positive cells. b Left panel: Bar graph showing MMP obtained by pooling together measures acquired in DFs isolated from all the male or female donors and reported as mean ± SD of the median fluorescence intensity. Right panels: Cytofluorimetric histograms of MMP evaluation obtained in one representative cell line of XY and XY DFs. *p < 0.01 between XY and XX DFs
Fig. 3a Side scatter vs FL1 (GFP) dot plots obtained in one representative XY DFs cell line untransduced or transduced with GFP-miR548am-5p in the presence or absence of AZT. Numbers indicate the percentage of GFP-positive cells. b Cytofluorimetric histograms of Bax and Bcl-2 expression level in GFP-negative and -positive cells obtained in one representative XY DFs cell line after transduction with GFP-miR548am-5p. Numbers indicate the median fluorescence intensity. Bar graph on the right shows the ratio Bax/Bcl-2 of four XY DFs cell lines. *p < 0.01 between GFP-positive and GFP-negative cell populations. c Flow cytometry histograms of apoptosis evaluation in GFP-positive or -negative cell populations of one representative XY DFs cell line after transduction with GFP-miR548am-5p treated or not with CHX+TNF-α. Numbers represent the percentages of annexin V-positive cells. Bar graph showing flow cytometry analysis after cell staining with Annexin V-APC performed in triplicate and reported as means ± SD of four XY DFs cell lines
Fig. 4a Side scatter vs (FL1) GFP dot plots obtained in one representative XX DFs cell line untransduced or transduced with GFP-anti-miR548am-5p in the presence or absence of AZT. Numbers indicate the percentage of GFP-positive cells. b Cytofluorimetric histograms of Bax and Bcl-2 expression level in GFP-negative and -positive cells obtained in one representative XX DFs cell line after transduction with GFP-anti-miR548am-5p. Numbers indicate the median fluorescence intensity. Bar graph on the right shows the ratio Bax/Bcl-2 of four XX DFs cell lines. *p < 0.01 between GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells. c Flow cytometry histograms of apoptosis evaluation in GFP-positive or -negative cells of one representative XY DFs cell line after transduction with GFP-anti-miR548am-5p treated or not with CHX+TNF-α. Numbers represent the percentages of Annexin V-positive cells. Bar graph showing flow cytometry analysis after cell staining with Annexin V-APC performed in triplicate and reported as means ± SD of four XX DFs cell lines