Literature DB >> 31511295

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography in Men with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Matthias Eiber1, Boris Hadaschik2, Wolfgang P Fendler3,4, Manuel Weber2, Amir Iravani5, Michael S Hofman5, Jérémie Calais4, Johannes Czernin4, Harun Ilhan6, Fred Saad7, Eric J Small8, Matthew R Smith9, Paola M Perez8, Thomas A Hope8, Isabel Rauscher1, Anil Londhe10, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz11, Shinta Cheng12, Tobias Maurer1,13, Ken Herrmann2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Systemic androgen-signaling inhibition added to ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved clinical outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without detectable metastases by conventional imaging (nmCRPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) detects prostate cancer with superior sensitivity to conventional imaging, but its performance in nmCRPC remains largely unknown. We characterized cancer burden in high-risk patients with nmCRPC using PSMA-PET. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We retrospectively included 200 patients with nmCRPC, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >2 ng/mL, and high risk for metastatic disease [PSA doubling time (PSADT) of ≤10 months and/or Gleason score of ≥8] from six high-volume PET centers. We centrally reviewed PSMA-PET detection rate for pelvic disease and distant metastases (M1). We further evaluated SPARTAN patients stratified by risk factors for PSMA-PET-detected M1 disease.
RESULTS: PSMA-PET was positive in 196 of 200 patients. Overall, 44% had pelvic diseases, including 24% with local prostate bed recurrence, and 55% had M1 disease despite negative conventional imaging. Interobserver agreement was very high (κ: 0.81-0.91). PSA ≥ 5.5 ng/mL, locoregional nodal involvement determined by pathology (pN1), prior primary radiation, and prior salvage radiotherapy independently predicted M1 disease (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA-PET detected any disease in nearly all patients and M1 disease in 55% of patients previously diagnosed with nmCRPC, including subgroups with PSADT of ≤10 months and Gleason score of ≥8. The value of PSMA-PET imaging for treatment guidance should be tested in future studies. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31511295     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  41 in total

Review 1.  [Systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  PSMA PET-CT redefines nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Piet Ost
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Expanding the role of small-molecule PSMA ligands beyond PET staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shankar Siva; Cristian Udovicich; Ben Tran; Homi Zargar; Declan G Murphy; Michael S Hofman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  [What does the nonradiologist expect from the radiologist?]

Authors:  Stefan Kasper; Isabel Virchow; Boris Hadaschik; Jan Philipp Radtke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alex Pozdnyakov; Roshini Kulanthaivelu; Glenn Bauman; Claudia Ortega; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Ur Metser
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 6.  [Artificial intelligence in hybrid imaging].

Authors:  Christian Strack; Robert Seifert; Jens Kleesiek
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Rebello; Christoph Oing; Karen E Knudsen; Stacy Loeb; David C Johnson; Robert E Reiter; Silke Gillessen; Theodorus Van der Kwast; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET.

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Louise Emmett; Judit A Adam; Jamshed Bomanji; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael S Hofman; Thomas A Hope; Rakesh Kumar; Steven P Rowe; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Stefano Fanti; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasutaka Yamada; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 10.  New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Yasin Bhanji; Steven P Rowe; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.