| Literature DB >> 31510108 |
Ludmila Eisner1, Isabel Wilhelm2, Günter Flachenecker3, Jürgen Hürttlen4, Wolfgang Schade5,6.
Abstract
A sensor for trinitrotoluene (TNT) detection was developed by using a combination of optical micro-ring technology and a receptor coating based on molecularly imprinted sol-gel layers. Two techniques for deposition of receptor layers were compared: Airbrush technology and electrospray ionization. A concentration of less than 5 ppb for TNT in the gas-phase, using electrospray deposition of the receptor layer, was detected. The cross-sensitivities to organic substances and further nitro-based explosives were compared. As a result, the sensitivity to TNT is about one order of magnitude higher in comparison to the explosives 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) or 1,3-dinitrobenzene (DNB) and about four orders of magnitude higher than the organic substances phenol, ethanol, and acetone. The signal response of the sensor is fast, and the compact sensor design enables the deposition of different receptor layers on multiple optical micro-rings on one chip, which allows a more precise analysis and reduction of side effects and false alarms.Entities:
Keywords: evanescent field sensor; explosives; micro-ring resonator; molecularly imprinted sol-gel
Year: 2019 PMID: 31510108 PMCID: PMC6767136 DOI: 10.3390/s19183909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Scheme of sol-gel imprinting process.
Figure 2Typical transmission spectrum of a micro-ring resonator. Black: transmission spectrum of the micro-ring resonator without receptor layer. Red: transmission spectrum of the micro-ring resonator with receptor layer.
Figure 3Photo of the complete sensor chip (top) and laser scanning microscope image of one micro-ring (bottom).
Figure 4Scheme of template synthesis.
Figure 5Shift of the resonant wavelength in dependence of trinitrotoluene (TNT) concentration. Blue: Chip was covered by air brush proceeding, black: Chip was covered by electrospray ionization.
Figure 6Schematic configuration of the experimental set up.
Figure 7Shift of the resonant transmission minimum to a longer wavelength in dependence of TNT concentration.
Figure 8Shift of the resonant transmission minimum to a longer wavelength in dependence of DNT concentration.
Figure 9Shift of the resonant wavelength for 1 ppb concentration of explosive.
Figure 10Shift of the resonant wavelength for 1 ppb concentration of organic solvents.