Ann-Kathrin Rauch1, Stephanie Kagermann2, Thomas Wesarg2, Till Fabian Jakob2, Antje Aschendorff2, G Ihorst3, Iva Speck2, Susan Arndt2. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, ENT Clinic, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, ann-kathrin.rauch@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, ENT Clinic, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Clinical Trials Center, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study analyses data logs in order to investigate the usage pattern of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with single-sided deafness (SSD-CI) and bilaterally deaf, uni- or bilaterally implanted CI recipients (Uni-CI and Bil-CI). Data logging is available from SCAN, an automated auditory scene classifier which categorizes auditory input into 6 listening environments. METHODS: CI usage data were retrospectively available from data logs of 206 CI recipients using the Nucleus 6 system obtained between January 2013 and June 2015. For all recipients, we analysed time on air and time spent in the listening environments. For statistical analysis, we matched the CI recipients according to age and duration of CI experience and classified them into 4 age groups. RESULTS: SSD-CI showed a similar time on air compared to Uni- and Bil-CI. Usage behaviour of SSD-CI was comparable to Uni- and Bil-CI regarding exposure to music, speech in quiet and speech in noise. With increasing age, exposure to quiet increased and exposure to music decreased across all CI recipient groups in relation to time on air. CONCLUSION: In total, the CI usage pattern of SSD-CI is comparable for the majority of listening environments and age groups to that of Uni- and Bil-CI. The results of our study show that SSD-CI benefit equally from CI implantation.
PURPOSE: This study analyses data logs in order to investigate the usage pattern of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with single-sided deafness (SSD-CI) and bilaterally deaf, uni- or bilaterally implanted CI recipients (Uni-CI and Bil-CI). Data logging is available from SCAN, an automated auditory scene classifier which categorizes auditory input into 6 listening environments. METHODS: CI usage data were retrospectively available from data logs of 206 CI recipients using the Nucleus 6 system obtained between January 2013 and June 2015. For all recipients, we analysed time on air and time spent in the listening environments. For statistical analysis, we matched the CI recipients according to age and duration of CI experience and classified them into 4 age groups. RESULTS: SSD-CI showed a similar time on air compared to Uni- and Bil-CI. Usage behaviour of SSD-CI was comparable to Uni- and Bil-CI regarding exposure to music, speech in quiet and speech in noise. With increasing age, exposure to quiet increased and exposure to music decreased across all CI recipient groups in relation to time on air. CONCLUSION: In total, the CI usage pattern of SSD-CI is comparable for the majority of listening environments and age groups to that of Uni- and Bil-CI. The results of our study show that SSD-CI benefit equally from CI implantation.
Authors: Tine Arras; An Boudewyns; Freya Swinnen; Andrzej Zarowski; Birgit Philips; Christian Desloovere; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 4.996