| Literature DB >> 31509565 |
Jan Hoong Ho1,2, Safwaan Adam1,2, Shazli Azmi2, Maryam Ferdousi2, Yifen Liu2, Alise Kalteniece2, Shaishav S Dhage1,2, Brian G Keevil3, Akheel A Syed4, Basil J Ammori5, Tomás Ahern6, Rachelle Donn2, Rayaz A Malik2,7, Handrean Soran1,2.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Multiple factors contribute to sexual dysfunction in men with obesity. Sex hormone levels are commonly abnormal in men with obesity and this abnormality is often the focus of management in clinical practice. The role of small fibre neuropathy in obesity-related sexual dysfunction is not well established.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31509565 PMCID: PMC6738611 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Comparison of demographics, clinical characteristics, and sex hormone levels between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients divided based on erectile function.
| Asymptomatic based on erectile function | Symptomatic based on erectile function | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 44.4 ±8.4 | 52.1 ±10.9 | |
| | 54.8 ±12.4 | 46.9 ±7.3 | |
| | 5 (38%) | 14 (88%) | |
| | 5±3 | 6±5 | 0.787 |
| | 10 (77%) | 14 (88%) | 0.453 |
| | 4 (30%) | 11 (68%) | |
| | 0 (0–1) | 1 (0–2) | 0.092 |
| | 52±13 | 55±15 | 0.591 |
| | 3.8±1.2 | 4.0±1.0 | 0.796 |
| | 1.0±0.5 | 1.3±0.5 | 0.206 |
| | 1.01±0.38 | 0.95±0.22 | 0.702 |
| | 2.5±1.0 | 2.4±0.8 | 0.808 |
| | 7 (54) | 10 (63) | 0.638 |
| | 9.0 (6.4–12.3) | 8.8 (6.4–11.0) | 0.914 |
| | 179 (132–311) | 176 (120–216) | 0.351 |
| | 29.2 (21.7–35.5) | 32.1 (21.7–38.3) | 0.559 |
| | 2.3±1.2 | 3.5±1.9 | 0.059 |
| | 4.2 (2.9–4.7) | 3.5 (2.4–4.9) | 0.779 |
| | 0.60 (0.34–0.98) | 0.62 (0.50–0.99) | 0.914 |
| | 2.2 (1.1–3.4) | 1.3 (0.9–3.6) | 0.537 |
| | 2.3 (1.6–3.0) | 1.6 (1.3–2.4) | 0.170 |
Notes: Data are presented as mean and standard deviation for normally-distributed variables and median and interquartile range for non-parametric variables. Independent t-test was performed for normally-distributed variables, Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric variables, and chi-squared test for categorical variables when comparing asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. p<0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated haemoglobin; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Comparison of measures of neuropathy between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients divided based on erectile function.
| Asymptomatic based on erectile function | Symptomatic based on erectile function | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (0–5) | 4 (0–15) | 0.131 | |
| 13.3±5.6 | 16.3±7.2 | 0.296 | |
| 22.6±5.9 | 20.6±8.2 | 0.528 | |
| 41.0±2.3 | 41.9±3.3 | 0.437 | |
| 20.29±3.21 | 16.74±4.45 | ||
| 30.21 (27.34–33.59) | 27.60 (22.50–29.17) | ||
| 60.75±33.53 | 45.70±24.86 | 0.201 | |
| 35 (24–44) | 14 (12–23) |
Notes: Data are presented as mean and standard deviation for normally-distributed variables and median and interquartile range for non-parametric variables. Independent t-test was performed for normally-distributed variables, Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric variables, and chi-squared test for categorical variables when comparing asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. p<0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Abbreviations: CNFD, corneal nerve fibre density; CNBD, corneal nerve branch density; CNFL, corneal nerve fibre length; CT, cold perception threshold; DB-HRV, deep breathing heart rate variability; NSP, neuropathy symptom profile; VPT, vibration perception threshold; WT, warm perception threshold.
Fig 1Comparison of corneal nerve parameters in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients based on erectile function score (a & b) and comparison of total and free testosterone levels between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients based on erectile function (c & d), frequency of sexual thoughts (e & f), and frequency of morning erections (g & h).
CNFL and CNFD are both significantly lower in symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients with erectile dysfunction (a & b). Data are presented as mean and standard deviation for normally-distributed variables and median and interquartile range for non-parametric variables. Erectile function questionnaire response categories: 1: always able to keep erection good enough for sexual intercourse, 2: usually able, 3: sometimes able, 4: never able. Abbreviations: CNFD, corneal nerve fibre density; CNFL, corneal nerve fibre length. p<0.05 is considered statistically significant.