| Literature DB >> 31509352 |
Payam Mohassel1, Teerin Liewluck2, Ying Hu1, Daniel Ezzo1, Tracy Ogata1, Dimah Saade1, Sarah Neuhaus1, Véronique Bolduc1, Yaqun Zou1, Sandra Donkervoort1, Livija Medne3, Charlotte J Sumner4, P James B Dyck2, Klaas J Wierenga5, Gihan Tennekoon6, Richard S Finkel7, Jiani Chen8, Thomas L Winder9, Nathan P Staff2, A Reghan Foley1, Manuel Koch10, Carsten G Bönnemann1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the natural history and clinical features of myopathies caused by mono-allelic, dominantly acting pathogenic variants in COL12A1.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31509352 PMCID: PMC6801183 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.50882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
General phenotype of patients with heterozygous, dominantly acting, COL12A1 pathogenic variants.
| Patient | 1Aa | 1B | 1C | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | M | F | M | M | M | M |
| Recognized Onset | Congenital | Congenital | Congenital | 4 years | Congenital | Congenital |
| Age | 5 | 37 | 33 | 62 | 4 | 3 |
| Motor Development | Mild gross motor delay | Mild gross motor delay | Mild gross motor delay | Normal | Mild gross and fine motor delay | Mild gross and fine motor delay |
| Pattern of Weakness (MRC) | Neck flexion (2/5), proximal and distal weakness (4/5) | Distal (4+/5) | Distal (4/5) | Distal (4/5) | Mild distal and proximal weakness | Head lag, mild proximal and distal weakness |
| Joint Hyperlaxity | Distal and proximal | Distal and proximal | Distal and proximal | None | Distal and proximal | Distal and proximal |
| FVC | 95% | 104% | 96% | 115% | 81% | ND |
| CK (U/L) | 174 | 60 | 101 | 106 | 103 | 99 |
| Mutation | c.7951‐630_8100+991 del1771ins10 | c.8276G>A, p.Gly2759Asp | c.8453G>A, p.Gly2818Glu | c.8065 G>A, p.Gly2689Arg | ||
a 1A is 1B’s son, and 1C is 1B’s brother. FVC, forced vital capacity (reported as percent predicted); ND, not done.
Figure 1Clinical photos and muscle imaging. (A) Joint hyperlaxity (left and middle) and prominent calcanei (right) are common findings in patients with connective tissue disease, including dominant collagen XII‐related myopathic EDS. (B) Muscle Ultrasound shows normal appearing muscle in younger patients (1A, 3) and more pronounced increase in granular echogenicity in the rectus femoris muscle (arrows) in the older patient (1B). Notably, the central increase in echogenicity, characteristic of collagen VI‐related disorders is absent (1B). (C) Muscle MRI of the thigh and lower legs show mild increase in T1 weighted signal. This is most notable near the epimysium of rectus femoris, peroneus longus, and medial gastrocnemius muscles (arrowheads).
Figure 2Muscle histology and dermal fibroblast immunostaining. (A) Muscle biopsy of patient 2 (tibialis anterior) shows increased internal nuclei, fiber size variability, and type 1 fiber predominance with numerous ring fibers. (B) Immunofluorescent images of skin dermal fibroblast cultures obtained from patient 4 compared to normal control. There is a near complete absence of extracellular fibrillar collagen XII (red) staining with prominent intracellular retention of collagen XII when compared against other extracellular matrix proteins, for example, fibronectin (green), scale bar 50 µm. The insets show higher magnification, confocal microscope images of a single cell with the nucleus outlined, highlighting the significant intracellular retention of collagen XII in the patient cells; scale bar for insets 25 µm (C) Schematic diagram of collagen XII single chain, its different domains, and COL12A1 exons corresponding to the region to which the pathogenic variants from family 1–4 map. Empty triangle denotes glycine substitution. Line denotes deletion in family 1 with breakpoints in intron 51 and 52. Col = collagenous domain, NC = noncollagenous domain, LGL = laminin‐G like domain.
Figure 3Identification of a large genomic deletion mutation in family 1 and siRNA mediated allele specific knockdown. (A) Schematic of the long‐range PCR approach to identify the suspected genomic deletion mutation in this region. (B) A ~ 1.8 kb heterozygous deletion between primers 1F and 5R is identified and further characterized between 3F and 4R primers. This heterozygous deletion encompassing exon 52 segregates with the disease phenotype in family 1. Ctrl‐1 = unaffected sibling of 1A, Ctrl‐2 = unaffected parent of 1A, Ctrl‐3 = normal control. (C) Schematic of the wild‐type and mutant cDNA in family 1 (top) and location of cDNA primers. Endpoint PCR of the cDNA from dermal fibroblasts before and after treatment with allele‐specific siRNA1 designed to target the exon 51–53 junction shows a dose dependent decrease in the pathogenic deleted allele. Control scrambled siRNAsc does not have an effect on either allele. (D) Immunofluorescent staining of P1b dermal fibroblasts after treatment with siRNA1 (0.1 nmol/L) but not control siRNAsc results in a prominent reduction of intracellular retention and restoration of the fibrillar pattern of extracellular collagen XII staining (red), similar to the normal control.
Figure 4Evaluation of the effective dose range of siRNA1. (A) Left: Increasing siRNA1 dose to 100 nmol/L does not affect the normal allele as visualized on end point PCR (top) or real‐time PCR using wild‐type (WT) or mutant (del52) specific primers. Right: Decreasing the siRNA1 dose to pmol/L range confirms that maximal effects of allele specific knockdown are apparently achieved between 50 and 100 pmol/L. (B) High concentrations of the siRNA1 up to 100 nmol/L also do not affect the normal (WT) allele in normal control cells. Real‐time PCR for each siRNA1 concentration was performed in triplicates and the fold change values were averaged and normalized to the untreated samples. Bar height represents the mean fold change and error bar represents SEM (three technical replicates) for each condition.