Jules R Dugré1, Nathalie Bitar1, Alexandre Dumais1, Stéphane Potvin1. 1. Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal (all authors); Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal (all authors); and Institut Philippe-Pinel de Montréal, Montreal (Dumais).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It has long been assumed that paranoid ideation may stem from an aberrant limbic response to threatening stimuli. However, results from functional neuroimaging studies using negative emotional stimuli have failed to confirm this assumption. One of the potential reasons for the lack of effect is that study participants with psychosis may display aberrant brain responses to neutral material rather than to threatening stimuli. The authors conducted a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A literature search was performed with PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase to identify functional neuroimaging studies examining brain responses to neutral material in patients with psychosis. A total of 23 studies involving schizophrenia patients were retrieved. Using t-maps of peak coordinates to calculate effect sizes, a random-effects model meta-analysis was performed with the anisotropic effect-size version of Seed-based d Mapping software. RESULTS: In schizophrenia patients relative to healthy control subjects, increased activations were observed in the left and right amygdala and parahippocampus and the left putamen, hippocampus, and insula in response to neutral stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Given that several limbic regions were found to be more activated in schizophrenia patients than in control subjects, the results of this meta-analysis strongly suggest that these patients confer aberrant emotional significance to nonthreatening stimuli. In theory, this abnormal brain reactivity may fuel delusional thoughts. Studies are needed in individuals at risk of psychosis to determine whether aberrant limbic reactivity to neutral stimuli is an early neurofunctional marker of psychosis vulnerability.
OBJECTIVE: It has long been assumed that paranoid ideation may stem from an aberrant limbic response to threatening stimuli. However, results from functional neuroimaging studies using negative emotional stimuli have failed to confirm this assumption. One of the potential reasons for the lack of effect is that study participants with psychosis may display aberrant brain responses to neutral material rather than to threatening stimuli. The authors conducted a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A literature search was performed with PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase to identify functional neuroimaging studies examining brain responses to neutral material in patients with psychosis. A total of 23 studies involving schizophreniapatients were retrieved. Using t-maps of peak coordinates to calculate effect sizes, a random-effects model meta-analysis was performed with the anisotropic effect-size version of Seed-based d Mapping software. RESULTS: In schizophreniapatients relative to healthy control subjects, increased activations were observed in the left and right amygdala and parahippocampus and the left putamen, hippocampus, and insula in response to neutral stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Given that several limbic regions were found to be more activated in schizophreniapatients than in control subjects, the results of this meta-analysis strongly suggest that these patients confer aberrant emotional significance to nonthreatening stimuli. In theory, this abnormal brain reactivity may fuel delusional thoughts. Studies are needed in individuals at risk of psychosis to determine whether aberrant limbic reactivity to neutral stimuli is an early neurofunctional marker of psychosis vulnerability.
Authors: Antígona Martínez; Russell H Tobe; Pablo A Gaspar; Daniel Malinsky; Elisa C Dias; Pejman Sehatpour; Peter Lakatos; Gaurav H Patel; Dalton H Bermudez; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Brandee Feola; Maureen McHugo; Kristan Armstrong; Madison P Noall; Elizabeth A Flook; Neil D Woodward; Stephan Heckers; Jennifer Urbano Blackford Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Cathy Davies; Robin Wilson; Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi; Grace Blest-Hopley; Michael Brammer; Jesus Perez; Robin M Murray; Paul Allen; Matthijs G Bossong; Philip McGuire; Sagnik Bhattacharyya Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-13 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Jack J Blanchard; Christina L G Savage; Ryan D Orth; Anyela M Jacome; Melanie E Bennett Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 4.157