| Literature DB >> 31508804 |
Lotta-Katrin Pries1, Agustin Lage-Castellanos2,3, Philippe Delespaul1, Gunter Kenis1, Jurjen J Luykx4,5,6, Bochao D Lin5, Alexander L Richards7, Berna Akdede8, Tolga Binbay8, Vesile Altinyazar9, Berna Yalinçetin10, Güvem Gümüş-Akay11, Burçin Cihan12, Haldun Soygür13, Halis Ulaş14, Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran15, Semra Ulusoy Kaymak16, Marina M Mihaljevic17,18, Sanja Andric Petrovic18, Tijana Mirjanic19, Miguel Bernardo20,21,22, Bibiana Cabrera20,22, Julio Bobes22,23,24,25, Pilar A Saiz22,23,24,25, María Paz García-Portilla22,23,24,25, Julio Sanjuan22,26, Eduardo J Aguilar22,26, José Luis Santos22,27, Estela Jiménez-López22,28, Manuel Arrojo29, Angel Carracedo30, Gonzalo López22,31, Javier González-Peñas22,31, Mara Parellada22,31, Nadja P Maric17,18, Cem Atbaşoğlu32, Alp Ucok33, Köksal Alptekin8, Meram Can Saka32, Celso Arango22,31, Michael O'Donovan7, Bart P F Rutten1, Jim van Os1,4,34, Sinan Guloksuz1,35.
Abstract
Exposures constitute a dense network of the environment: exposome. Here, we argue for embracing the exposome paradigm to investigate the sum of nongenetic "risk" and show how predictive modeling approaches can be used to construct an exposome score (ES; an aggregated score of exposures) for schizophrenia. The training dataset consisted of patients with schizophrenia and controls, whereas the independent validation dataset consisted of patients, their unaffected siblings, and controls. Binary exposures were cannabis use, hearing impairment, winter birth, bullying, and emotional, physical, and sexual abuse along with physical and emotional neglect. We applied logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and Ridge penalized classification models to the training dataset. ESs, the sum of weighted exposures based on coefficients from each model, were calculated in the validation dataset. In addition, we estimated ES based on meta-analyses and a simple sum score of exposures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic, and Nagelkerke's R2 were compared. The ESMeta-analyses performed the worst, whereas the sum score and the ESGNB were worse than the ESLR that performed similar to the ESLASSO and ESRIDGE. The ESLR distinguished patients from controls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94, P < .001), patients from siblings (OR = 1.58, P < .001), and siblings from controls (OR = 1.21, P = .001). An increase in ESLR was associated with a gradient increase of schizophrenia risk. In reference to the remaining fractions, the ESLR at top 30%, 20%, and 10% of the control distribution yielded ORs of 3.72, 3.74, and 4.77, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that predictive modeling approaches can be harnessed to evaluate the exposome.Entities:
Keywords: cannabis; childhood trauma; environment; hearing impairment; machine learning; predictive modeling; psychosis; risk score; schizophrenia; winter birth
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31508804 PMCID: PMC6737483 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schizophr Bull ISSN: 0586-7614 Impact factor: 9.306