Literature DB >> 31508804

Estimating Exposome Score for Schizophrenia Using Predictive Modeling Approach in Two Independent Samples: The Results From the EUGEI Study.

Lotta-Katrin Pries1, Agustin Lage-Castellanos2,3, Philippe Delespaul1, Gunter Kenis1, Jurjen J Luykx4,5,6, Bochao D Lin5, Alexander L Richards7, Berna Akdede8, Tolga Binbay8, Vesile Altinyazar9, Berna Yalinçetin10, Güvem Gümüş-Akay11, Burçin Cihan12, Haldun Soygür13, Halis Ulaş14, Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran15, Semra Ulusoy Kaymak16, Marina M Mihaljevic17,18, Sanja Andric Petrovic18, Tijana Mirjanic19, Miguel Bernardo20,21,22, Bibiana Cabrera20,22, Julio Bobes22,23,24,25, Pilar A Saiz22,23,24,25, María Paz García-Portilla22,23,24,25, Julio Sanjuan22,26, Eduardo J Aguilar22,26, José Luis Santos22,27, Estela Jiménez-López22,28, Manuel Arrojo29, Angel Carracedo30, Gonzalo López22,31, Javier González-Peñas22,31, Mara Parellada22,31, Nadja P Maric17,18, Cem Atbaşoğlu32, Alp Ucok33, Köksal Alptekin8, Meram Can Saka32, Celso Arango22,31, Michael O'Donovan7, Bart P F Rutten1, Jim van Os1,4,34, Sinan Guloksuz1,35.   

Abstract

Exposures constitute a dense network of the environment: exposome. Here, we argue for embracing the exposome paradigm to investigate the sum of nongenetic "risk" and show how predictive modeling approaches can be used to construct an exposome score (ES; an aggregated score of exposures) for schizophrenia. The training dataset consisted of patients with schizophrenia and controls, whereas the independent validation dataset consisted of patients, their unaffected siblings, and controls. Binary exposures were cannabis use, hearing impairment, winter birth, bullying, and emotional, physical, and sexual abuse along with physical and emotional neglect. We applied logistic regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and Ridge penalized classification models to the training dataset. ESs, the sum of weighted exposures based on coefficients from each model, were calculated in the validation dataset. In addition, we estimated ES based on meta-analyses and a simple sum score of exposures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic, and Nagelkerke's R2 were compared. The ESMeta-analyses performed the worst, whereas the sum score and the ESGNB were worse than the ESLR that performed similar to the ESLASSO and ESRIDGE. The ESLR distinguished patients from controls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94, P < .001), patients from siblings (OR = 1.58, P < .001), and siblings from controls (OR = 1.21, P = .001). An increase in ESLR was associated with a gradient increase of schizophrenia risk. In reference to the remaining fractions, the ESLR at top 30%, 20%, and 10% of the control distribution yielded ORs of 3.72, 3.74, and 4.77, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that predictive modeling approaches can be harnessed to evaluate the exposome.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cannabis; childhood trauma; environment; hearing impairment; machine learning; predictive modeling; psychosis; risk score; schizophrenia; winter birth

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31508804      PMCID: PMC6737483          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  24 in total

1.  The interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction.

Authors:  Maxia Dong; Robert F Anda; Vincent J Felitti; Shanta R Dube; David F Williamson; Theodore J Thompson; Clifton M Loo; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2004-07

2.  Evidence That Environmental and Familial Risks for Psychosis Additively Impact a Multidimensional Subthreshold Psychosis Syndrome.

Authors:  Lotta-Katrin Pries; Sinan Guloksuz; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Nicole Gunther; Christian Rauschenberg; Ulrich Reininghaus; Rajiv Radhakrishnan; Maarten Bak; Bart P F Rutten; Jim van Os
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.

Authors:  Evangelia Christodoulou; Jie Ma; Gary S Collins; Ewout W Steyerberg; Jan Y Verbakel; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Preventive strategies for mental health.

Authors:  Celso Arango; Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja; Patrick D McGorry; Judith Rapoport; Iris E Sommer; Jacob A Vorstman; David McDaid; Oscar Marín; Elena Serrano-Drozdowskyj; Robert Freedman; William Carpenter
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  Evidence that the presence of psychosis in non-psychotic disorder is environment-dependent and mediated by severity of non-psychotic psychopathology.

Authors:  S Guloksuz; M van Nierop; R Lieb; R van Winkel; H-U Wittchen; J van Os
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  The "polyenviromic risk score": Aggregating environmental risk factors predicts conversion to psychosis in familial high-risk subjects.

Authors:  Jaya L Padmanabhan; Jai L Shah; Neeraj Tandon; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Increased risk of psychosis in patients with hearing impairment: Review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Mascha M J Linszen; Rachel M Brouwer; Sophie M Heringa; Iris E Sommer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Northern Hemisphere season of birth studies in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Davies; Joy Welham; David Chant; E Fuller Torrey; John McGrath
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Childhood adversities increase the risk of psychosis: a meta-analysis of patient-control, prospective- and cross-sectional cohort studies.

Authors:  Filippo Varese; Feikje Smeets; Marjan Drukker; Ritsaert Lieverse; Tineke Lataster; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; John Read; Jim van Os; Richard P Bentall
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Psychotic Experiences in the General Population: Symptom Specificity and the Role of Distress and Dysfunction.

Authors:  Albert R Powers
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Age- and sex-specific associations between risk scores for schizophrenia and self-reported health in the general population.

Authors:  Jai L Shah; Sinan Guloksuz; Vincent Paquin; Lotta-Katrin Pries; Margreet Ten Have; Maarten Bak; Nicole Gunther; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Bochao D Lin; Kristel R van Eijk; Gunter Kenis; Alexander Richards; Michael C O'Donovan; Jurjen J Luykx; Bart P F Rutten; Jim van Os
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non-psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS-2 cohort.

Authors:  Sinan Guloksuz; Lotta-Katrin Pries; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Boris Klingenberg; Maarten Bak; Bochao D Lin; Kristel R van Eijk; Philippe Delespaul; Therese van Amelsvoort; Jurjen J Luykx; Bart P F Rutten; Jim van Os
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Association of Recent Stressful Life Events With Mental and Physical Health in the Context of Genomic and Exposomic Liability for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lotta-Katrin Pries; Jim van Os; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Maarten Bak; Bochao D Lin; Kristel R van Eijk; Gunter Kenis; Alexander Richards; Michael C O'Donovan; Jurjen J Luykx; Bart P F Rutten; Sinan Guloksuz
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

5.  Examining Gene-Environment Interactions Using Aggregate Scores in a First-Episode Psychosis Cohort.

Authors:  Sergi Mas; Daniel Boloc; Natalia Rodríguez; Gisela Mezquida; Silvia Amoretti; Manuel J Cuesta; Javier González-Peñas; Alicia García-Alcón; Antonio Lobo; Ana González-Pinto; Iluminada Corripio; Eduard Vieta; Josefina Castro-Fornieles; Anna Mané; Jeronimo Saiz-Ruiz; Patricia Gassó; Miquel Bioque; Miquel Bernardo
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Need for Ethnic and Population Diversity in Psychosis Research.

Authors:  Carla Burkhard; Saba Cicek; Ran Barzilay; Rajiv Radhakrishnan; Sinan Guloksuz
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Polygenic liability for schizophrenia and childhood adversity influences daily-life emotion dysregulation and psychosis proneness.

Authors:  L-K Pries; B Klingenberg; C Menne-Lothmann; J Decoster; R van Winkel; D Collip; P Delespaul; M De Hert; C Derom; E Thiery; N Jacobs; M Wichers; O Cinar; B D Lin; J J Luykx; B P F Rutten; J van Os; S Guloksuz
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 8.  Beyond the looking glass: recent advances in understanding the impact of environmental exposures on neuropsychiatric disease.

Authors:  Jonathan A Hollander; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Felice N Jacka; Steven T Szabo; Tomás R Guilarte; Staci D Bilbo; Carolyn J Mattingly; Sheryl S Moy; Ebrahim Haroon; Mady Hornig; Edward D Levin; Mikhail V Pletnikov; Julia L Zehr; Kimberly A McAllister; Anika L Dzierlenga; Amanda E Garton; Cindy P Lawler; Christine Ladd-Acosta
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 8.294

9.  Examining the independent and joint effects of genomic and exposomic liabilities for schizophrenia across the psychosis spectrum.

Authors:  L-K Pries; G A Dal Ferro; J van Os; P Delespaul; G Kenis; B D Lin; J J Luykx; A L Richards; B Akdede; T Binbay; V Altınyazar; B Yalınçetin; G Gümüş-Akay; B Cihan; H Soygür; H Ulaş; E Şahin Cankurtaran; S Ulusoy Kaymak; M M Mihaljevic; S Andric Petrovic; T Mirjanic; M Bernardo; G Mezquida; S Amoretti; J Bobes; P A Saiz; M Paz García-Portilla; J Sanjuan; E J Aguilar; J L Santos; E Jiménez-López; M Arrojo; A Carracedo; G López; J González-Peñas; M Parellada; N P Maric; C Atbaşoğlu; A Ucok; K Alptekin; M Can Saka; C Arango; M O'Donovan; S Tosato; B P F Rutten; S Guloksuz
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.892

10.  What makes the psychosis 'clinical high risk' state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?

Authors:  Laila Hasmi; Lotta-Katrin Pries; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Maarten Bak; Gunter Kenis; Alexander Richards; Bochao D Lin; Michael C O'Donovan; Jurjen J Luykx; Bart P F Rutten; Sinan Guloksuz; Jim van Os
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.