Bifidobacterium longum KACC 91563 secretes family 5 extracellular solute-binding protein via extracellular vesicle. In our previous work, it was demonstrated that the protein effectively alleviated food allergy symptoms via mast cell specific apoptosis, and it has revealed a therapeutic potential of this protein in allergy treatment. In the present study, we cloned the gene encoding extracellular solute-binding protein of the strain into the histidine-tagged pET-28a(+) vector and transformed the resulting plasmid into the Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). The histidine-tagged extracellular solute-binding protein expressed in the transformed cells was purified using Ni-NTA affinity column. To enhance the efficiency of the protein purification, three parameters were optimized; the host bacterial strain, the culturing and induction temperature, and the purification protocol. After the process, two liters of transformed culture produced 7.15 mg of the recombinant proteins. This is the first study describing the production of extracellular solute-binding protein of probiotic bacteria. Establishment of large-scale production strategy for the protein will further contribute to the development of functional foods and potential alternative treatments for allergies.
Bifidobacterium longum KACC 91563 secretes family 5 extracellular solute-binding protein via extracellular vesicle. In our previous work, it was demonstrated that the protein effectively alleviated food allergy symptoms via mast cell specific apoptosis, and it has revealed a therapeutic potential of this protein in allergy treatment. In the present study, we cloned the gene encoding extracellular solute-binding protein of the strain into the histidine-tagged pET-28a(+) vector and transformed the resulting plasmid into the Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). The histidine-tagged extracellular solute-binding protein expressed in the transformed cells was purified using Ni-NTA affinity column. To enhance the efficiency of the protein purification, three parameters were optimized; the host bacterial strain, the culturing and induction temperature, and the purification protocol. After the process, two liters of transformed culture produced 7.15 mg of the recombinant proteins. This is the first study describing the production of extracellular solute-binding protein of probiotic bacteria. Establishment of large-scale production strategy for the protein will further contribute to the development of functional foods and potential alternative treatments for allergies.
Extracellular vesicle (EV) is a term for a vesicle released from cells to
extracellular environment. EVs are found in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic
cells, and they are known to be responsible for the intercellular communications
(Zaborowski et al., 2015). Both
gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria secrete EVs, which carry proteins, nucleic
acid, toxins, and cell wall components inside the 20–300 nm size of lipid
bilayer cargo (Kim et al., 2015). Bacterial
EVs recently have been spotlighted as key messengers of host-microbe interactions
since it can deliver bacterial compounds directly into host cells in a stable and
targeted form (Sanchez et al., 2010). Many
recent studies have depicted that EVs are able to enter hosts’ epithelial
cells and directly modulate host immunity (Sanchez
et al., 2010). For example, it was reported that EVs secreted from
Bifidobacterium bifidum LMG13195 helped differentiation of
forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3) 1 Treg cells, and Lactobacillus
plantarum-derived EV components prolonged the survival of
Caenorhabditis elegans which was exposed to
vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) (Li et al., 2017; Lopez et al., 2012).Family 5 extracellular solute-binding protein (ESBP) is one of the two components of
the EV of Bifidobacterium longum KACC 91563. In general, ESBP is
known to be capable of chemotaxis, transmembrane transport, and facilitating sensory
transduction pathways (Tam and Saier, 1993).
In our previous works, oral administration of the strain to a mouse model resulted
in significantly decreased food allergy symptoms, and it also led to significant
increase of Bifidobacterium and decrease of harmful bacteria such
as Enterobacteriaceae and Clostridium and increased level of SCFA
in feces when administered to healthy dog group (Kim
et al., 2016; Park et al., 2018).
It was also demonstrated that EVs produced by B. longum KACC 91563
were selectively internalized into mast cells and induced apoptosis of mast cells
(Kim et al., 2016). The EV from B.
longum KACC 91563 was identified to contain two proteins, ESBP and ASBP
(ABC transporter, substrate-binding protein). Of these two proteins, only ESBP was
capable of reducing the number of mast cells in the small intestine and ameliorating
symptoms of food allergy (Kim et al., 2016).
In particular, the ESBP had impacts specifically on the mast cells without
suppressing any T cell-mediated immune responses.Probiotic products were traditionally considered to exert proper health-promoting
effects only when administered alive, but recent evidences are increasing that
administration of the postbiotic molecules secreted from beneficial bacteria may be
sufficient to promote the desired effects (Heo et
al., 2018; Ruiz et al., 2014).
Moreover, since administration of live bacteria strains always involves a risk of
acting as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance genes which have potential to pass
them to pathogenic bacteria and its stability and viability in host body is
difficult to determine, utilization of probiotic bacterial extracellular molecules
may represent a safer alternative way for the application of probiotic bacteria
(Mehdi et al., 2016; Yan et al., 2007). For this reason, recently,
there is a growing interest in the application of postbiotic molecules in the food
products production. Postbiotic molecules from L. plantarum YML007
has been utilized as bio-preservative on soybeans grains, and nisin produced by
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains is
utilized in food products including canned soups, cheeses, mayonnaise, and baby
foods, as a food preservative (Aguilar-Toala et al.,
2018; Ahmad Rather et al., 2013;
Chen et al., 2003). Postbiotic metabolites
also have been shown to achieve high productivity and better health when used as
animal feed additive (Loh et al., 2014).
Utilization of postbiotic metabolites are not limited to functional foods. They have
been introduced with potential pharmaceutical applications in the prevention or
treatment of disease. For example, CytoFlora®, molecules from
micronized cell wall lysates of several Lactobacillus and
Bifidobacterium species, has been used to promote immune
response and reduce intestinal dysbiosis in autisticchildren (Ray et al., 2010). Despite the vast application potentials like
other well-known postbiotics, large-scale production of ESBP using recombinant DNA
technology had not been explored before. Therefore, we report here the first study
of cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant ESBP from B.
longum KACC 91563 into E. coli strainBL21 (DE3).
Materials and Methods
All the enzymes for DNA cloning and amplification were purchased from TAKARA
(Kusatsu, Japan), and the expression vector pET-28a(+) was from Invitrogen
(CA, USA). E. coli strainBL21 (DE3) and BL21 (DE3) RIPL was also
from Invitrogen (CA, USA). LB/Amp broth was from Difco (MD, USA), and
isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was purchased from Invitrogen (CA,
USA). The Ni-NTA affinity matrix was purchased from QIAGEN (Hilden, Germany).
Buffers and all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA).
Bacterial species and vectors
B. longum subsp. longum KACC 91563 was provided
by the National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration.
It was originally isolated from feces of healthy Korean neonate in our previous
study (Ham et al., 2011). E.
coli BL21 (DE3) and E. coliBL21 (DE3) RIPL were
used as recombinant protein expression host bacteria for gene cloning.
pET-28a(+) was chosen to construct expression vector.
Construction of cloning and expression vectors
1,650 bp gene fragment encoding ESBP protein of 546 amino acid residues
(Supplementary Information) was inserted into the histidine-tagged (His-tag)
pET-28a(+) vector (Fig. 1), and then
expressed in both E. coli strainBL21 (DE3) and BL21 (DE3) RIPL
to attain optimized induction condition. Following enzyme digestion
(NdeI/XhoI), the target DNA fragments were
ligated into the NdeI/XhoI sites of
pET-28a(+) vector to construct the fusion expression vector. Then the
ligated product pET28a-KACC91563 was transformed into both E.
coli strains.
Fig. 1.
pET-28a(+), a vector used for the expression of ESBP.
Map of the pET-28a(+) expression vector used in this study. The
location of the inserted gene and restriction sites used is shown. ESBP,
extracellular solute-binding protein.
pET-28a(+), a vector used for the expression of ESBP.
Map of the pET-28a(+) expression vector used in this study. The
location of the inserted gene and restriction sites used is shown. ESBP,
extracellular solute-binding protein.
Induction and expression of fusion proteins
Both E. coli strains carrying the expression vector were grown
in LB broth containing ampicillin (LB/Amp) at 20°C and 37°C for
overnight with continuous shaking at 200 rpm to optimize the culturing and
induction temperature. The culture was diluted 1:50 or 1:100 in a 5 mL of LB/Amp
and incubated until the OD600 reached 0.4–0.5.
Protein expression was induced by adding IPTG to a final
concentration of 1.0 mM and incubation was continued at 37°C with shaking
at 200 rpm, and 0.5 mL of fractions were collected every hour for 3 h. Also, 1
mL was taken from the culture to make a second tube simultaneously after adding
IPTG, and it was incubated at 20°C with shaking at 200 rpm as well for 16
h, and then 0.5 mL of fraction was used for analysis. The cells were harvested
by centrifugation and resuspended in 50 uL of SDS sample buffer. The sample was
boiled for 3 min and examined for the position of expressed protein by SDS-PAGE.
12% SDS-PAGE gel was loaded with 5 μL (equivalent to 100 μL
of cells) and the bands were visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue.
Protein purification
ESBP protein was purified via affinity chromatography using a
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) gel matrix. For optimization purpose,
purification was performed under both native condition and denatured condition
with different sets of buffers (Table 1).
The harvested cells were resuspended in each type of Ni-NTA lysis buffer (Table 1) by vigorous poking, stirring, and
pipetting. The resuspended cells were lysed by sonication on setting 3, in an
ice bucket, pulsed with 30 sec on, 30 sec off for 5 min total. To clarify the
cell lysate, additional sonication on setting 4 were done for 5 min. The lysates
were transferred to a column containing Ni-NTA resin. The column was washed with
buffer (Table 1). The protein was then
eluted by increasing the imidazole concentration to 250 mM. SDS-PAGE and
Coomassie blue staining was used to analyze the purity of the ESBP following the
purification process.
Table 1.
Summary of tested buffers according to each condition for
optimization
Buffer
Condition
Component
Lysis buffer
Native
A: 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl (pH
8.0)B: 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300
mM NaCl (pH 8.0)
Denatured
50 mM NaH2PO4,
300 mM NaCl, 8M urea (pH 8.0)
Wash buffer
Native
A: 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 20 mM
imidazole (pH 8.0)B: 50 mM
NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole
(pH 8.0)
Denatured
50 mM NaH2PO4,
300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 8M urea (pH 8.0)
Elution buffer
Native
A: 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 250 mM
imidazole (pH 8.0)B: 50 mM
NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole
(pH 8.0)
Denatured
50 mM NaH2PO4,
300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, 8M urea (pH 8.0)
Results
Establishment of optimal conditions with small-scale cultures
To examine the growth profile and the expression level of recombinant ESBP
protein, pET281-KACC91563 was transformed into two E. coli
strains BL21 (DE3) and BL21 (DE3) RIPL and used for protein induction and
expression. Each transformed strain was also grown and induced separately at
20°C, 37°C to explore the optimal temperature. We performed
SDS-PAGE analysis to check protein size and optimize expression. As shown in
Fig. 2, expression of ESBP protein from
lysate supernatant was successful in both E. coli strains, but
the expression was improved when the culture was incubated and induced at
37°C. Therefore, it can be concluded that 37°C is the optimal
temperature for producing ESBP protein.
Fig. 2.
Comparison of expression of recombinant ESBP protein in two different
E. coli strains at 20°C,
37°C.
The ESBP protein expression in two E. coli strains, BL21
(DE3), BL21 (DE3) RIPL harboring pET28a-KACC91563 which were grown and
induced at 20°C, 37°C was examined. The ESBP protein was
examined and detected using 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with
Coomassie blue. Both host strains were suitable for ESBP expression, but
the expression level was enhanced when the cells grown and incubated at
37°C. Lane M, pre-stained protein marker; lane 1, before IPTG
induction; lane 2, 6, induced cell lysate total using buffer A; lane 3,
7, induced cell lysate using buffer B; lane 4, 8, induced cell lysate
supernatant using buffer A; lane 5, 9, induced cell lysate supernatant
using buffer B. Buffer A contains 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl (pH 8.0).
Buffer B contains 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl (pH
8.0). Arrows indicate ESBP protein. ESBP, extracellular solute-binding
protein; IPTG, isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside.
Comparison of expression of recombinant ESBP protein in two different
E. coli strains at 20°C,
37°C.
The ESBP protein expression in two E. coli strains, BL21
(DE3), BL21 (DE3) RIPL harboring pET28a-KACC91563 which were grown and
induced at 20°C, 37°C was examined. The ESBP protein was
examined and detected using 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with
Coomassie blue. Both host strains were suitable for ESBP expression, but
the expression level was enhanced when the cells grown and incubated at
37°C. Lane M, pre-stained protein marker; lane 1, before IPTG
induction; lane 2, 6, induced cell lysate total using buffer A; lane 3,
7, induced cell lysate using buffer B; lane 4, 8, induced cell lysate
supernatant using buffer A; lane 5, 9, induced cell lysate supernatant
using buffer B. Buffer A contains 20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl (pH 8.0).
Buffer B contains 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl (pH
8.0). Arrows indicate ESBP protein. ESBP, extracellular solute-binding
protein; IPTG, isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside.To determine the suitable purification protocol for ESBP protein, purification
was carried out separately under native and denaturing conditions using the
Ni-NTA column. One sample of an induced culture was lysed under native condition
while another sample was proceeded in a buffer containing 8 M urea.
Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE analysis of each sample collected through the
purification steps is shown in Fig. 3. The
presence of specific 60.0 kDa target protein band was confirmed with the native
lysate (Fig. 3A), but with purification
under denaturing condition, no visible protein band of the appropriate molecular
weights eluted (Fig. 3B). The efficiency of
the different buffer sets on purification under native condition was also tested
(Table 1). As shown in Fig. 3A, the recombinant proteins were eluted
with both buffer A and B, but the use of buffer A enhanced protein purification.
Thus, it was determined that applying native condition using buffer A would be
appropriate for the large-scale purification.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of purification of His-tagged recombinant ESBP protein
under native and denaturing conditions with Ni-NTA column.
A. Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of purified ESBP protein under native
condition with buffer A and B (Table
1). Native ESBP protein with the predicted molecular weight
of 60.0 kDa was eluted with both buffers. Lane M, pre-stained protein
marker; lane 1, 8, induced cell supernatant (10 μL / 1.5 mL);
lane 2, 9, flow-through (10 μL / 1.5 mL); lane 3–4,
10–11, columns eluates following the 20 mM imidazole buffer
washing step (10 μL / 1 mL); lane 5–7, 12–14,
columns eluates following elution with 250 mM imidazole buffer (10
μL / 30 μL). Arrow indicates ESBP protein. B. SDS-PAGE
using Coomassie staining of purified ESBP protein under denaturing
condition. No recombinant protein was recovered following elution. Lane
M, pre-stained protein marker; lane 1, induced cell urea supernatant (10
μL / 1 mL); lane 2, column eluate following the washing step with
8 M urea buffer, pH 8.0 (flowthrough, 10 μL / 1 mL); lane
3–4, columns eluate following the washing step with 8 M urea
buffer, pH 8.0 (10 μL / 1 mL); lane 5–7, columns eluate
following elution with 8M urea buffer, pH 8.0 (10 μL / 30
μL). Arrow indicates ESBP protein. ESBP, extracellular
solute-binding protein.
Comparison of purification of His-tagged recombinant ESBP protein
under native and denaturing conditions with Ni-NTA column.
A. Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of purified ESBP protein under native
condition with buffer A and B (Table
1). Native ESBP protein with the predicted molecular weight
of 60.0 kDa was eluted with both buffers. Lane M, pre-stained protein
marker; lane 1, 8, induced cell supernatant (10 μL / 1.5 mL);
lane 2, 9, flow-through (10 μL / 1.5 mL); lane 3–4,
10–11, columns eluates following the 20 mM imidazole buffer
washing step (10 μL / 1 mL); lane 5–7, 12–14,
columns eluates following elution with 250 mM imidazole buffer (10
μL / 30 μL). Arrow indicates ESBP protein. B. SDS-PAGE
using Coomassie staining of purified ESBP protein under denaturing
condition. No recombinant protein was recovered following elution. Lane
M, pre-stained protein marker; lane 1, induced cell urea supernatant (10
μL / 1 mL); lane 2, column eluate following the washing step with
8 M urea buffer, pH 8.0 (flowthrough, 10 μL / 1 mL); lane
3–4, columns eluate following the washing step with 8 M urea
buffer, pH 8.0 (10 μL / 1 mL); lane 5–7, columns eluate
following elution with 8M urea buffer, pH 8.0 (10 μL / 30
μL). Arrow indicates ESBP protein. ESBP, extracellular
solute-binding protein.
Purification on a larger scale
Based on the results from the small-scale culture optimization, the
pET281-KACC91563 was transformed into E. coli strainBL21
(DE3), and the cells were grown at 37°C in LB broth containing ampicillin
to a cell density of OD600=0.55–0.6. Expression was
induced by adding 1 mM IPTG at 37°C as well, and then protein
purification was performed under native condition with buffer A. For the
purification, the cell pellet was dissolved in binding buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM
NaCl, 5 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)), and the lysate-Ni-NTA mixture was loaded into
Ni-NTA column. After the column had been washed with buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM
NaCl, 20 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)), the His-tagged recombinant protein was eluted
with elution buffers (20 mM Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 100 mM imidazole (pH 8.0) / 20 mM
Tris, 10 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)). As a result, the elution of 60.0
kDa target ESBP protein band was confirmed (Fig.
4). Total 7.15 mg of purified protein was obtained from 2 L of
culture with yield of 3.58 mg/L.
Fig. 4.
Purification of His-tagged recombinant ESBP protein under native
condition with Ni-NTA column.
Coomassie-stained 12% SDS-PAGE of purified ESBP protein under
native condition with the predicted molecular weight of 60.0 kDa was
eluted. Lane M, pre-stained protein marker; lane 1, uninduced cell
supernatant (10 μL/0.2 mL); lane 2, induced cell supernatant (10
μL/35 mL); lane 3, flow-through (10 μL/35 mL); lane
4–8, columns eluates following the 20 mM imidazole buffer washing
step (10 μL/5 mL); lane 9–13, columns eluates following
elution with 100 mM imidazole buffer (10 μL/3 mL); lane
14–18, columns eluates following elution with 250 mM imidazole
buffer (10 μL/3 mL). Arrows indicate ESBP protein. ESBP,
extracellular solute-binding protein.
Purification of His-tagged recombinant ESBP protein under native
condition with Ni-NTA column.
Coomassie-stained 12% SDS-PAGE of purified ESBP protein under
native condition with the predicted molecular weight of 60.0 kDa was
eluted. Lane M, pre-stained protein marker; lane 1, uninduced cell
supernatant (10 μL/0.2 mL); lane 2, induced cell supernatant (10
μL/35 mL); lane 3, flow-through (10 μL/35 mL); lane
4–8, columns eluates following the 20 mM imidazole buffer washing
step (10 μL/5 mL); lane 9–13, columns eluates following
elution with 100 mM imidazole buffer (10 μL/3 mL); lane
14–18, columns eluates following elution with 250 mM imidazole
buffer (10 μL/3 mL). Arrows indicate ESBP protein. ESBP,
extracellular solute-binding protein.
Discussion
The therapeutic potential of EVs from eukaryotic cells (e.g. mesenchymal stem cells)
has gained increasing interests in recent years, and several industrial cell
manufacturers have already been giving efforts to eukaryotic EVs production for
clinical use (El Andaloussi et al., 2013;
Rani et al., 2015). Yet, the research
into the applications of bacterial EVs is still in its beginning stage to be
investigated. However, bacteria also secrete many different types of EV containing
proteins which perform diverse biological processes in the environment. Especially,
a considerable amount of evidences has suggested in recent studies that the
extracellular molecules produced by probiotic bacteria are linked directly to the
health-promoting effects attributed to the corresponding strain (Sanchez et al., 2010). Several postbiotic
molecules and its host immunomodulatory activity have been identified, and these
findings provide opportunities for the development of new promising functional
foods. EVs can be directly produced from large-scale cultures of bacteria in a
straight forward way (Bitto and Kaparakis-Liaskos,
2017). However, the heterogenous nature of EVs makes it difficult to
ensure consistency which is important for commercial application, and some EVs may
even contain undesirable components like toxins (Bitto and Kaparakis-Liaskos, 2017). In addition, the presence of some
EV-associated immunogens can rather induce adverse immune responses. To overcome
these challenges, the development of large-scale production strategy targeting for
specific EV protein of interest using prokaryotic expression systems is suggested.
We report here the successful cloning and purification of the B.
longum EV-derived protein, ESBP in E. coli, which was
revealed to alleviate food allergy symptoms in our previous study. This is the first
study of ESBP of probiotic bacteria production using recombinant DNA technology.Currently most treatments for allergic diseases concentrate on either preventing the
effects of histamine or inhibiting the body’s overall immune responses using
various substances. Though, none of these attempts are completely effective, and
suppression of overall immune responses can lead to another significant health
problem. Since the ESBP has the specificity for mast cells, it will be very useful
for the development of safe and effective alternative therapeutics. In this study,
we produced the ESBP protein by cloning a gene encoding ESBP from B.
longum KACC 91563 into E. coliBL21 (DE3). To enhance
the efficiency of the protein purification, we have investigated and optimized three
parameters which are the host bacterial strain, the culturing and induction
temperature, and the purification protocol. It was confirmed that the expression
level was improved when the culture was incubated and induced at 37°C. We
could produce the recombinant protein under native condition, while no visible
protein band of the appropriate molecular weights was observed with denaturing
condition. Purification under native conditions is an ideal condition to preserve
its biological activity and avoid significant loss of produced protein during the
renaturation step (Saffarian et al., 2016).
After the parameters affecting the amount of purified protein were explored and
optimized, total of 7.15 mg of ESBP were produced from two liters of transformed
culture. The production yield presented here might be not sufficient for mass
production yet, but application of more recently devised protocols may facilitate
increasing efficiency and yield production. Considering the particular beneficial
effects of it, commercialization of the recombinant ESBP will have a potential to
treat a wide range of allergic disease, which may have advantages over current
therapeutic approaches and also can be used as a functional ingredient for
production of various functional foods. We expect that the results presented in this
study will serve as a starting point for further studies to make it possible.
Authors: Fang Yan; Hanwei Cao; Timothy L Cover; Robert Whitehead; M Kay Washington; D Brent Polk Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-11-17 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: I Ahmad Rather; B J Seo; V J Rejish Kumar; U-H Choi; K-H Choi; J H Lim; Y-H Park Journal: Lett Appl Microbiol Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 2.858
Authors: José A Morales-Contreras; Jessica E Rodríguez-Pérez; Carlos A Álvarez-González; Mirian C Martínez-López; Isela E Juárez-Rojop; Ángela Ávila-Fernández Journal: Food Sci Biotechnol Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 3.231