| Literature DB >> 31508493 |
Lydia Palma1, Jesus Fernandez-Bayo1, Deb Niemeier2, Maurice Pitesky3, Jean S VanderGheynst1,4.
Abstract
Increases in global human population are leading to increasing demands for food production and waste management. Insect biomass is a sustainable alternative to traditional animal feeds when insects are produced on lignocellulosic by-products. Resources high in lignocellulose have high carbon to nitrogen ratios and require nitrogen supplementation to accelerate bioconversion. Here we report on studies that examine the influence of nitrogen supplementation of almond hull-based feedstocks on black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) cultivation and composition. Decreasing carbon to nitrogen ratio from 49 to 16 increased larvae harvest dry weight, specific larvae growth, and yield by 36%, 31%, and 51%, respectively. However, the decrease in carbon to nitrogen ratio decreased larvae methionine and cysteine contents by 11% and 13%, respectively. The findings demonstrate that carbon to nitrogen ratio can be managed to enhance bioconversion of lignocellulose to larvae, but that this management approach can reduce larvae amino acid content.Entities:
Keywords: Environmental biotechnology; Environmental impact
Year: 2019 PMID: 31508493 PMCID: PMC6718667 DOI: 10.1038/s41538-019-0047-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NPJ Sci Food ISSN: 2396-8370
Statistical analysis of effect of C/N ratio and particle size on larvae yield, hull consumption, larvae harvest weight, and specific larvae growth
| Factor | Larvae harvest dry weight (g larvae−1) | Specific larvae growth (g g−1) dry | Larvae yield (unitless) | Hull consumption (% dry basis) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | |||||
| C/N ratio | −0.00056 | <0.0001a | −0.032 | 0.056 | −0.0073 | 0.018a | 0.014 | 0.013a |
| Particle size | 0.00085 | 0.013a | 0.090 | 0.013a | 0.034 | 0.11 | ||
| C/N ratio*C/N ratio | 0.00011 | 0.023a | −0.014 | 0.14 | ||||
The interaction between C/N ratio and particle size was not significant for any response
aIndicates significant p-value < 0.05
Statistical analysis of effect of C/N ratio and particle size on larvae composition
| Factor | Cysteine (g kg−1) | Methionine (g kg−1) | Calcium (g kg−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | ||||
| C/N ratio | 0.083 | 0.0002a | 0.32 | <0.0001a | −0.055 | 0.80 |
| Particle size | 0.055 | 0.093 | 0.17 | 0.020a | 0.84 | 0.071 |
| C/N ratio*C/N ratio | −0.016 | 0.094 | −0.030 | 0.13 | −0.35 | 0.016a |
The interaction between C/N ratio and particle size was not significant for any response
aIndicates significant p-value < 0.05
Summary of results from C/N ratio and temperature experiment
| Temperature (°C) | C/N ratio | Larvae harvest dry weight (mg/larvae) | Specific larvae growth (g g−1) dry | Larvae yield (unitless) | Hull consumption (% dry basis) | Methionine content of larvae (g kg−1) dry | Cysteine content of larvae (g kg−1) dry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 16 | 9.2 (1.1) | 19.9 (2) | 0.067 (0.01) | 22.9 (3.6) | 4.63 (0.13) | 2.98 (0.06) |
| 32 | 9.7 (1.7) | 22.0 (1.9) | 0.057 (0.003) | 29.4 (1.0) | 4.91 (0.10) | 3.21 (0.12) | |
| 49 | 5.4 (0.5) | 13.8 (0.7) | 0.033 (0.003) | 31.4 (2.5) | 4.85 (0.22) | 3.36 (0.18) | |
| 34 | 16 | 12.9 (1.7) | 20.3 (2.5) | 0.058 (0.005) | 25.8 (1.0) | 4.15 (0.12) | 2.72 (0.07) |
| 32 | 10.9 (0.6) | 24.2 (2.6) | 0.064 (0.004) | 29.1 (1.5) | 4.63 (0.18) | 2.90 (0.15) | |
| 49 | 8.7 (0.7) | 24.9 (1.6) | 0.057 (0.003) | 33.0 (2.7) | 5.03 (0.20) | 3.20 (0.10) |
Standard deviations in parentheses. Three replicates for all treatments except C/N 16 at 34 °C with two replicates
Statistical analysis of effect of C/N ratio and temperature on larvae yield, hull consumption, larvae harvest weight, and specific larvae growth
| Factor | Larvae harvest dry weight (g/larvae) | Specific larvae growth (g g−1) dry | Larvae yield (unitless) | Hull consumption (% dry basis) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | |||||
| C/N ratio | −0.0021 | <0.0001a | −0.99 | 0.15 | −0.01 | <0.0001a | 0.002 | <0.0001a |
| Temperature | 0.0013 | 0.0005a | 2.4 | 0.0004a | 0.004 | 0.0042a | 0.006 | 0.23 |
| C/N ratio*temperature | 2.8 | 0.0008a | 0.0028 | <0.0001a | ||||
| C/N ratio*C/N ratio | −0.0014 | 0.033a | −3.6 | 0.0036a | −0.0066 | 0.0156a | ||
aIndicates significant p-value < 0.05
Statistical analysis of effect of C/N ratio and temperature on larvae composition
| Factor | Ash (g kg−1) | Crude fat (g kg−1) | Methionine (g kg−1) | Cysteine (g kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | |||||
| C/N ratio | −1.2 | 0.244 | 0.0003a | 0.213 | <0.0001a | |||
| Temperature | 0.70 | 0.007a | −1.59 | 0.007a | −0.091 | 0.0348a | −0.123 | 0.0006a |
| C/N ratio*temperature | 0.168 | 0.0048a | ||||||
The second-order effect of C/N ratio was not significant for any response
aIndicates significant p-value < 0.05
Approximate C/N ratios of organic waste used to cultivate BSF larvae
| Organic BSF feedstock | C/N ratio of feedstock | BSF prepupal harvest weight (g) dry | Sources for C/N | Source for prepupal weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fecal sludge | 7.1–29.3 | 0.07 |
[ |
[ |
| Brewers spent grain | 12.1–21.5 | 0.078 |
[ |
[ |
| Banana peels | 18.4–29.0 | 0.055 |
[ |
[ |
| Kitchen waste | 16.5–30.8 | 0.101 |
[ |
[ |
| Rice straw | 58.7–71.7 | 0.016 |
[ |
[ |
| Almond hulls | 72 |
[ | ||
| Amended almond hulls | 29 | 0.0023–0.025 |
[ |
Comparison of larvae for C/N ratio and temperature study
| Feedstock | Temp (°C) | C/N ratio | Life cycle phase | Protein (g kg−1) | Ash (g kg−1) | Calcium (g kg−1) | Crude fat (g kg−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almond hulls | 28 | 16–49 | E-p | 451.5–512.0 | 100.7–105.0 | 20.1–22.2 | 50.9–89.2 | Present study |
| Almond hulls | 32 | 16–49 | E-p | 455.7–474.8 | 111.7–119.6 | 22.3–27.7 | 27.9–51.2 | Present study |
| Chicken feed | E-pp | 400.5–403.5 | 85.9–90.2 | 27.6–30.4 | 277.5–282.5 |
[ | ||
| Chicken feed | L-pp | 401.9–406.1 | 95.4–96.6 | 239.2–244.8 |
[ | |||
| Chicken feed | E-p | 460.8–463.2 | 94.5–97.5 | 80.8–83.2 |
[ | |||
| Chicken feed | L-p | 435.9–440.1 | 98.8–105.2 | 28.2–31.8 | 71.7–72.3 |
[ |
E-pp: early prepupa (>14 days), L-pp: late prepupa, E-p: early pupa, L-p: late pupa
Particle size distribution
| Material | Fraction | Total solids (g g−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Almond hulls ground using hammer mill | 2–6.35 mm | 0.27 |
| 1–2 mm | 0.36 | |
| 0.50–1 mm | 0.12 | |
| 0.25–0.50 mm | 0.06 | |
| 0.125–0.25 mm | 0.03 | |
| 0.063–0.125 mm | 0.02 | |
| <0.063 mm | 0.00 | |
| Almond hulls ground using hammer mill followed by handheld grinder | 2–4 mm | 0.06 |
| 1–2 mm | 0.42 | |
| 0.50–1 mm | 0.21 | |
| 0.25–0.50 mm | 0.11 | |
| 0.125–0.25 mm | 0.08 | |
| 0.063–0.125 mm | 0.05 | |
| <0.063 mm | 0.00 |
Parameters for experiments
| Variables | Preliminary study | C/N ratio and temperature |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon to nitrogen ratio | 16, 21, 25, 29, 33, 39, 45 | 16, 32, 49 |
| Moisture content (g kg−1) wet basis | 620 | 685 |
| Inoculation density (g dry weight larvae)(kg dry weight hulls)−1 | 8.9 | 2.5 |
| Average larvae weight in inoculum (mg dry weight) (larvae)−1 | 26 | 1.04 |
| Aeration rate (mL min−1 g dry weight−1) | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| Incubation temperature (°C) | 28 | 28, 34 |
| Largest particle size (mm) | 4, 6.35 | 6.35 |