Sunil K Mishra1, Ramesh Chowdhary2. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Department of Prosthodontics, Rajarajeswari Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review was done to find the patients oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and satisfaction with implant supported overdentures (IODs) when compared to conventional complete dentures (CCDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To identify suitable literature, an electronic search was performed using Medline/PubMed and Cochrane databases. Manual search of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and journals related to dental implants were also done. Articles published in English and articles whose abstract is available in English were included. The search was focused on patient's oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction with IODs when compared to CCDs.Titles and abstracts were screened, and literature that fulfilled the inclusion criteria was selected for a full-text reading. RESULTS: Initial literature search resulted in 1803 papers, 1779 were excluded after screenings of the abstracts by the reviewers which resulted in 24 studies. 5 studies were further excluded due to not fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 2 additional articles included after hand searching, resulting in total 21 articles in systematic review. The result suggests that mandibular CCDs had less retention as compared to maxillary conventional dentures CCDs, which improved drastically with IODs and provides a better oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction to the patients. CONCLUSION: Retention, stability, comfort, speech and chewing efficiency improved drastically with IODs, with enhanced patient's satisfaction and a better OHRQoL. Patients reported more satisfaction and OHRQoL with mandibular IOD when compared CCDs.
PURPOSE: This systematic review was done to find the patients oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and satisfaction with implant supported overdentures (IODs) when compared to conventional complete dentures (CCDs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To identify suitable literature, an electronic search was performed using Medline/PubMed and Cochrane databases. Manual search of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and journals related to dental implants were also done. Articles published in English and articles whose abstract is available in English were included. The search was focused on patient's oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction with IODs when compared to CCDs.Titles and abstracts were screened, and literature that fulfilled the inclusion criteria was selected for a full-text reading. RESULTS: Initial literature search resulted in 1803 papers, 1779 were excluded after screenings of the abstracts by the reviewers which resulted in 24 studies. 5 studies were further excluded due to not fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 2 additional articles included after hand searching, resulting in total 21 articles in systematic review. The result suggests that mandibular CCDs had less retention as compared to maxillary conventional dentures CCDs, which improved drastically with IODs and provides a better oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction to the patients. CONCLUSION: Retention, stability, comfort, speech and chewing efficiency improved drastically with IODs, with enhanced patient's satisfaction and a better OHRQoL. Patients reported more satisfaction and OHRQoL with mandibular IOD when compared CCDs.
Authors: Poul Erik Petersen; Denis Bourgeois; Hiroshi Ogawa; Saskia Estupinan-Day; Charlotte Ndiaye Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Salwa Omar Bajunaid; Abdullah S Alshahrani; Ahad A Aldosari; Atheer N Almojel; Rehab S Alanazi; Tala M Alsulaim; Syed Rashid Habib Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 3.390