Literature DB >> 31506647

Impact of hypertension phenotypes on the office and 24-h pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in individuals with or without antihypertensive medication use.

Annelise M G Paiva1,2, Maria I C M Gomes2, Érika M G Campana1, Audes D M Feitosa3,4,5, Andrei C Sposito6, Marco A Mota-Gomes2, Wilson Nadruz3,6, Andréa A Brandão7.   

Abstract

Data on the association of blood pressure (BP) phenotypes with office and out-of-office markers of vascular stiffness and pressure wave reflection are sparse. This study investigated office and 24-h measures of brachial BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and central augmentation index (AIx) across hypertension phenotypes among individuals not using BP-lowering medications [normotension (NT), white-coat hypertension (WH), masked hypertension (MH) and sustained hypertension (SH)] and those using BP-lowering medications [controlled hypertension (CH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH)]. We evaluated 454 untreated (age = 45 ± 15 years, 50% males) and 238 treated (age = 52 ± 15 years, 45% males) individuals who underwent office and 24-h brachial BP, PWV, and AIx measures using a Mobil-O-Graph PWA monitor. In the analysis adjusted for age and sex, WH had higher (p < 0.05) office PWV (7.53 ± 0.09 vs 6.89 ± 0.05), office AIx (27.9 ± 1.3 vs 23.8 ± 0.8), and daytime AIx (24.6 ± 0.7 vs 22.7 ± 0.4) compared with those of NT, while WUCH had higher (p < 0.05) office PWV (8.28 ± 0.11 vs 7.43 ± 0.08) and 24-h PWV (7.54 ± 0.09 vs 7.21 ± 0.07) than those of CH. MH had higher (p < 0.05) 24-h PWV (7.00 ± 0.09 vs 6.69 ± 0.04) and 24-h AIx (24.3 ± 0.9 vs 21.9 ± 0.4) than those of NT, whereas MUCH had higher (p < 0.05) 24-h PWV (7.64 ± 0.13 vs 7.21 ± 0.07) than that of CH. Lastly, SH or SUCH had significantly higher office and 24-h PWV and AIx than those of NT and CH, respectively. In conclusion, these results suggest that individuals with masked BP phenotypes are more predisposed to have adverse out-of-office vascular characteristics, while individuals with white-coat phenotypes have adverse office and out-of-office vascular characteristics compared with those of individuals with normal BP levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Arterial stiffness; Masked hypertension; White-coat hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31506647     DOI: 10.1038/s41440-019-0323-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  1 in total

1.  7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 2 - Diagnosis and Classification

Authors:  M V B Malachias; M A M Gomes; F Nobre; A Alessi; A D Feitosa; E B Coelho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.000

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes and isolated elevation of office central or brachial blood pressure.

Authors:  Audes D M Feitosa; Annelise M G Paiva; Marco A Mota-Gomes; Andréa A Brandão; Andrei C Sposito; Wilson Nadruz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.