Literature DB >> 31506369

Sources of Error in Office Blood Pressure Measurement.

Roy N Morcos1, Kimbroe J Carter2, Frank Castro2, Sumira Koirala2, Deepti Sharma2, Haroon Syed2.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: To evaluate 2 commonly overlooked sources of error in measuring blood pressure (BP) in the office, improper patient positioning and frequency of terminal digit bias (TDB) using manual and automated (BP) devices.
METHODS: BPs recorded by 3 nurses using manual and automated devices were analyzed for TDB. In the next part of the study, 294 patients were recruited and tested with each patient's BP measured twice in the table position and compared with BP measured in the chair position. To eliminate concern for position sequence, a randomized controlled trial was initially conducted.
RESULTS: Significant TDB for the digit zero was identified in BPs measured by all nurses using a manual device. No such bias was identified for any nurse when measuring BP with an automated device. For the positional study, the randomized controlled study showed no significant sequencing effect therefore the sequence of table then chair BP measurements was adopted. Significant BP lowering was observed in 128 patients (42.7%) in the chair compared with the table position. Misclassification of prehypertension and hypertension would have occurred in 15.3% and 16% of patients, respectively, when BP was recorded in the table instead of the chair position.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant TDB was identified for all nurses when using a manual but not an automated device. Patient positioning on the examination table resulted in elevations of systolic and diastolic BPs. © Copyright 2019 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood Pressure; Hypertension; Patient Positioning; Prehypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31506369     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  2 in total

1.  Examining the effectiveness of telemonitoring with routinely acquired blood pressure data in primary care: challenges in the statistical analysis.

Authors:  Richard A Parker; Paul Padfield; Janet Hanley; Hilary Pinnock; John Kennedy; Andrew Stoddart; Vicky Hammersley; Aziz Sheikh; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Effect of cuff positioning on the accuracy of blood pressure measurement with automated electronic blood pressure monitors.

Authors:  Ya Li; Fang Li; Yi Li; Xiaoran Cui; Jing Li; Hua Zhi; Weidong Wang; Yanyan Sun; Wei Cui
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.