| Literature DB >> 31505742 |
Song Liu1, Mengnan Lin1, Chunlin Li2.
Abstract
In the process of urbanization, high-intensity human activities have seriously disturbed the river networks, especially in the core urban areas of large cities. At present, a series of urban water environmental problems, such as urban waterlogging and non-point pollution, caused by damage to the river network structure and the decrease in surface permeability conditions in high-density urban areas have received widespread attention. In this study, the effects of the river network structure and urbanization on urban waterlogging were analyzed in the Pudong New Area by using the data of waterlogging sites on the Amap. The results showed that the average water surface ratio is 10.9%, the average river network density is 4.59 km/km2, and the comprehensive impervious ratio is 42.8%. From northwest to southeast, the impervious ratio of the Pudong New Area decreases gradually, and the water surface ratio and the river density increase gradually, while the areas with high waterlogging density are mainly concentrated in the northwest districts. The correlation coefficients indicate that the river network structure (-0.710 and -0.716) has a greater impact on waterlogging than urbanization (0.608) does. The current water surface ratio (10.9%) of the study area generally meets the requirements of the suitable water surface ratio (10.0%) in a rainfall return period of 50 years. However, the water surface ratio and the river density in about half of the districts did not meet the requirements of the suitable river network structure.Entities:
Keywords: Pudong New Area; impervious surface ratio; river density; surface water ratio; urban waterlogging; urbanization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31505742 PMCID: PMC6765834 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Regional location of the Pudong New Area (PNA) of Shanghai.
Figure 2Distribution of the river system in the Pudong New Area.
Figure 3Distribution of the waterlogging points in the Pudong New Area.
Figure 4Characteristics of the Pudong New Area. (a) Water surface ratio of the Pudong New Area; (b) River density of the Pudong New Area; (c) Impervious ratio of the Pudong New Area; (d) Waterlogging points density of the Pudong New Area.
Pearson’s correlation among the four factors.
| Variables | Water Surface Ratio (%) | Impervious Ratio (%) | River Density (km/km²) | Waterlogging Points Density (unit/km²) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water Surface Ratio (%) | 1 | −0.881 ** | 0.988 ** | −0.710 ** |
| Impervious Ratio (%) | - | 1 | −0.907 ** | 0.608 ** |
| River Density (km/km²) | - | - | 1 | −0.716 ** |
| Waterlogging Points Density (unit/km²) | - | - | - | 1 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 5Suitable water surface ratio index of the Pudong New Area.
Suitable river network structure of the Pudong New Area.
| Districts | Water Surface Ratio (%) | Suitable Water Surface Ratio (%) |
| River Density (km/km²) | Suitable River Density (km/km²) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beicai | 8.4 | 11.0 | −0.24 | 4.0 | 5.6 | −0.29 |
| Caolu | 11.8 | 9.2 | 0.28 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 0.02 |
| Chuanshaxin | 18.3 | 8.8 | 1.08 | 7.6 | 4.5 | 0.69 |
| Datuan | 15.8 | 8.1 | 0.95 | 7.3 | 4.1 | 0.78 |
| Dongminglu | 3.4 | 11.0 | −0.69 | 1.7 | 5.6 | −0.70 |
| Gaodong | 7.2 | 9.9 | −0.27 | 2.9 | 5.0 | −0.42 |
| Gaoxing | 8.3 | 10.2 | −0.19 | 2.7 | 5.2 | −0.48 |
| Gaoqiao | 8.5 | 10.1 | −0.16 | 3.1 | 5.2 | −0.40 |
| Hangtou | 20.9 | 8.4 | 1.49 | 8.6 | 4.3 | 1.00 |
| Heqing | 12.6 | 9.4 | 0.34 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 0.17 |
| Hudongxin | 3.8 | 11.6 | −0.67 | 1.9 | 5.9 | −0.68 |
| Huamu | 11.1 | 11.5 | −0.03 | 3.4 | 5.9 | −0.42 |
| Huinan | 16.0 | 8.9 | 0.80 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 0.43 |
| Jinqiao | 6.5 | 10.8 | −0.40 | 2.6 | 5.5 | −0.53 |
| Jinyangxin | 1.4 | 11.7 | -0.88 | 0.7 | 6.0 | −0.88 |
| Kangqiao | 12.8 | 9.0 | 0.42 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 0.04 |
| Laogang | 24.0 | 9.9 | 1.42 | 10.5 | 5.0 | 1.10 |
| Lujiazui | 0.3 | 11.7 | −0.97 | 0.1 | 6.0 | −0.98 |
| Nanhuixin | 27.8 | 10.8 | 1.57 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 0.82 |
| Nanmatou | 3.8 | 11.6 | −0.67 | 1.9 | 5.9 | −0.68 |
| Nicheng | 21.4 | 8.4 | 1.55 | 9.0 | 4.3 | 1.09 |
| Puxinglu | 4.1 | 11.4 | −0.64 | 1.9 | 5.8 | −0.67 |
| Sanlin | 6.2 | 10.1 | −0.39 | 2.8 | 5.1 | −0.45 |
| Shanggangxin | 2.4 | 11.2 | −0.79 | 1.0 | 5.7 | −0.82 |
| Luyuan | 18.2 | 8.1 | 1.25 | 8.4 | 4.1 | 1.05 |
| Tang | 11.1 | 9.3 | 0.19 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 0.02 |
| Tangqiao | 1.4 | 11.6 | −0.88 | 0.7 | 5.9 | −0.88 |
| Wanxiang | 17.7 | 8.2 | 1.16 | 8.1 | 4.2 | 0.93 |
| Weifangxin | 1.2 | 11.6 | −0.90 | 0.6 | 5.9 | −0.90 |
| Xinchang | 20.9 | 8.1 | 1.58 | 9.0 | 4.1 | 1.20 |
| Xuanqiao | 18.0 | 8.4 | 1.14 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 0.88 |
| Yangjing | 1.9 | 11.6 | −0.84 | 1.0 | 5.9 | −0.83 |
| Zhangjiang | 11.7 | 10.3 | 0.14 | 5.1 | 5.2 | −0.02 |
| Zhoujiadu | 3.0 | 11.4 | −0.74 | 1.6 | 5.8 | −0.72 |
| Zhoupu | 17.5 | 8.3 | 1.11 | 6.9 | 4.3 | 0.60 |
| Zhuqiao | 12.9 | 9.3 | 0.39 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 0.15 |
| Pudong New Area | 10.9 | 10.0 | 0.09 | 4.6 | 5.1 | −0.10 |
Figure 6Suitable river density index of the Pudong New Area.