E-S Väliaho1,2, P Kuoppa3, J A Lipponen3, T J Martikainen4, H Jäntti1,5, T T Rissanen6, I Kolk7, M Castrén8,9, J Halonen1,7, M P Tarvainen3,10, J E K Hartikainen1,7. 1. School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 2. Doctoral School, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 3. Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 4. Department of Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital, KYS, Kuopio, Finland. 5. Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 6. Heart Center, North Karelia Central Hospital, Joensuu, Finland. 7. Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 8. Emergency Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 10. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Abstract
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and a significant cause of cardioembolic strokes. Atrial fibrillation is often intermittent and asymptomatic making detection a major clinical challenge. We evaluated a photoplethysmography (PPG) wrist band in individual pulse detection in patients with AF and tested the reliability of two commonly used algorithms for AF detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 5-min PPG was recorded from patients with AF or sinus rhythm (SR) with a wrist band and analysed with two AF detection algorithms; AFEvidence and COSEn. Simultaneously registered electrocardiogram served as the golden standard for rhythm analysis and was interpreted by two cardiologists. The study population consisted of 213 (106 AF, 107 SR) patients. The wrist band PPG achieved individual pulse detection with a sensitivity of 91.7 ± 11.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.5 ± 4.6% for AF, with a sensitivity of 99.4 ± 1.5% [7.7% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 5.5% to 9.9%); P < 0.001] and PPV of 98.1 ± 4.1% [0.6% (95% CI -0.6% to 1.7%); P = 0.350] for SR. The pulse detection sensitivity was lower 86.7 ± 13.9% with recent-onset AF (AF duration <48 h, n = 43, 40.6%) as compared to late AF (≥48 h, n = 63, 59.4%) with 95.1 ± 7.2% [-8.3% (95% CI -12.9% to -3.7%); P = 0.001]. For the detection of AF from the wrist band PPG, the sensitivities were 96.2%/95.3% and specificity 98.1% with two algorithms. CONCLUSION: The wrist band PPG enabled accurate algorithm-based detection of AF with two AF detection algorithms and high individual pulse detection. Algorithms allowed accurate detection of AF from the PPG. A PPG wrist band provides an easy solution for AF screening. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and a significant cause of cardioembolic strokes. Atrial fibrillation is often intermittent and asymptomatic making detection a major clinical challenge. We evaluated a photoplethysmography (PPG) wrist band in individual pulse detection in patients with AF and tested the reliability of two commonly used algorithms for AF detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 5-min PPG was recorded from patients with AF or sinus rhythm (SR) with a wrist band and analysed with two AF detection algorithms; AFEvidence and COSEn. Simultaneously registered electrocardiogram served as the golden standard for rhythm analysis and was interpreted by two cardiologists. The study population consisted of 213 (106 AF, 107 SR) patients. The wrist band PPG achieved individual pulse detection with a sensitivity of 91.7 ± 11.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.5 ± 4.6% for AF, with a sensitivity of 99.4 ± 1.5% [7.7% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 5.5% to 9.9%); P < 0.001] and PPV of 98.1 ± 4.1% [0.6% (95% CI -0.6% to 1.7%); P = 0.350] for SR. The pulse detection sensitivity was lower 86.7 ± 13.9% with recent-onset AF (AF duration <48 h, n = 43, 40.6%) as compared to late AF (≥48 h, n = 63, 59.4%) with 95.1 ± 7.2% [-8.3% (95% CI -12.9% to -3.7%); P = 0.001]. For the detection of AF from the wrist band PPG, the sensitivities were 96.2%/95.3% and specificity 98.1% with two algorithms. CONCLUSION: The wrist band PPG enabled accurate algorithm-based detection of AF with two AF detection algorithms and high individual pulse detection. Algorithms allowed accurate detection of AF from the PPG. A PPG wrist band provides an easy solution for AF screening. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jari Halonen; Tero J Martikainen; Onni E Santala; Jukka A Lipponen; Helena Jäntti; Tuomas T Rissanen; Mika P Tarvainen; Tomi P Laitinen; Tiina M Laitinen; Maaret Castrén; Eemu-Samuli Väliaho; Olli A Rantula; Noora S Naukkarinen; Juha E K Hartikainen Journal: JMIR Cardio Date: 2022-06-21
Authors: Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Marcio Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo; Alberto Alfie; Serge Boveda; Nikolaos Dagres; Dario Di Toro; Lee L Eckhardt; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Carina Hardy; Takanori Ikeda; Aparna Jaswal; Elizabeth Kaufman; Andrew Krahn; Kengo Kusano; Valentina Kutyifa; Han S Lim; Gregory Y H Lip; Santiago Nava-Townsend; Hui-Nam Pak; Gerardo Rodríguez Diez; William Sauer; Anil Saxena; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Diego Vanegas; Marmar Vaseghi; Arthur Wilde; T Jared Bunch; Alfred E Buxton; Gonzalo Calvimontes; Tze-Fan Chao; Lars Eckardt; Heidi Estner; Anne M Gillis; Rodrigo Isa; Josef Kautzner; Philippe Maury; Joshua D Moss; Gi-Byung Nam; Brian Olshansky; Luis Fernando Pava Molano; Mauricio Pimentel; Mukund Prabhu; Wendy S Tzou; Philipp Sommer; Janice Swampillai; Alejandro Vidal; Thomas Deneke; Gerhard Hindricks; Christophe Leclercq Journal: Europace Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Martin Manninger; Jedrzej Kosiuk; David Zweiker; Mario Njeim; Bor Antolic; Bratislav Kircanski; Jacob M Larsen; Emma Svennberg; Philippe Vanduynhoven; David Duncker Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Onni E Santala; Jukka A Lipponen; Helena Jäntti; Tuomas T Rissanen; Jari Halonen; Indrek Kolk; Hanna Pohjantähti-Maaroos; Mika P Tarvainen; Eemu-Samuli Väliaho; Juha Hartikainen; Tero Martikainen Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Eemu-Samuli Väliaho; Jukka A Lipponen; Pekka Kuoppa; Tero J Martikainen; Helena Jäntti; Tuomas T Rissanen; Maaret Castrén; Jari Halonen; Mika P Tarvainen; Tiina M Laitinen; Tomi P Laitinen; Onni E Santala; Olli Rantula; Noora S Naukkarinen; Juha E K Hartikainen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 4.566