Literature DB >> 31504879

Exposure to a Tobacco-Specific Carcinogen Among Adolescent Smokeless Tobacco Users in Rural California, United States.

Benjamin W Chaffee1, Peyton Jacob2, Elizabeth T Couch1, Neal L Benowitz2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Approximately the same percentage of male high school students in the United States currently uses conventional smokeless tobacco as smokes cigarettes, resulting in toxin exposure.
METHODS: This study assessed tobacco product use (smokeless, combustible, and electronic cigarettes) and nicotine and carcinogen exposures in a sample of 594 male rural high school baseball players-a population traditionally at risk for smokeless tobacco use. Salivary specimens were assayed for cotinine (a biomarker of nicotine exposure) and urine specimens for 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL, a biomarker of the carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: The prevalence of past 30-day use of any tobacco product was 29%. Past 7-day smokeless tobacco use (prevalence: 13%) was associated with the highest levels of cotinine and NNAL observed in the sample, whether smokeless tobacco was used exclusively (geometric means: cotinine 11.1 ng/mL; NNAL 31.9 pg/mg-creatinine) or in combination with combustible products (geometric means: cotinine 31.6 ng/mL; NNAL 50.0 pg/mg creatinine). Cotinine and NNAL levels were incrementally higher in each increasing category of smokeless tobacco use frequency. However, observed levels were lower than previously reported for adults, likely reflecting less smokeless use per day among adolescents.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these biomarker observations, adolescents who use conventional smokeless tobacco products are exposed to substantial levels of nicotine and NNK. Although exposed to lower levels than adult smokeless users, the findings are concerning given the young age of the sample and tendency for smokeless tobacco users to increase use intensity over time. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that adolescents using smokeless tobacco are exposed to levels of nicotine and NNK that increase with use frequency and that exceed exposures among peers using other tobacco products. Youth smokeless tobacco use in the United States has not declined along with youth smoking prevalence, giving greater importance to this health concern. To reduce youth (and adult) exposures, needed actions include effective smokeless tobacco use prevention, potentially in combination with reducing the levels of harmful and potentially harmful chemicals in smokeless tobacco products currently popular among adolescents.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31504879      PMCID: PMC7542655          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  39 in total

1.  Smokeless tobacco use among professional baseball players: survey results, 1998 to 2003.

Authors:  H H Severson; K Klein; E Lichtensein; N Kaufman; C T Orleans
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smokeless tobacco brand switching: a means to reduce toxicant exposure?

Authors:  D K Hatsukami; J O Ebbert; A Anderson; H Lin; C Le; S S Hecht
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Smokeless tobacco and some tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2007

4.  Proposed cutoff for identifying adult smokeless tobacco users with urinary total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanonol: an aggregated analysis of NHANES 2007-2010 data.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Constantine I Vardavas; Gregory Connolly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  How Healthy is the Behavior of Young Athletes? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Katharina Diehl; Ansgar Thiel; Stephan Zipfel; Jochen Mayer; David G Litaker; Sven Schneider
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Prevalence, patterns, and correlates of spit tobacco use in a college athlete population.

Authors:  M M Walsh; J F Hilton; V L Ernster; C M Masouredis; D G Grady
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Rural Versus Urban Use of Traditional and Emerging Tobacco Products in the United States, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Megan E Roberts; Nathan J Doogan; Cassandra A Stanton; Amanda J Quisenberry; Andrea C Villanti; Diann E Gaalema; Diana R Keith; Allison N Kurti; Alexa A Lopez; Ryan Redner; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Elimination kinetics of the tobacco-specific biomarker and lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol.

Authors:  Maciej L Goniewicz; Christopher M Havel; Margaret Wilson Peng; Peyton Jacob; Delia Dempsey; Lisa Yu; Wioleta Zielinska-Danch; Bartosz Koszowski; Jan Czogala; Andrzej Sobczak; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Surveillance of moist snuff: total nicotine, moisture, pH, un-ionized nicotine, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines.

Authors:  Patricia Richter; Knachelle Hodge; Stephen Stanfill; Liqin Zhang; Clifford Watson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Perception Differences of Rural Male Youth.

Authors:  Benjamin W Chaffee; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.