C Wen1, X Wen1, R Li1, S Su1, H Xu1. 1. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangdong, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Silicosis is caused by long-term exposure to silica dust. Crystal rhinestone workers can be exposed to high levels of silica dust and are at risk of silicosis. AIMS: To explore silicosis cases, silica dust exposure and control measures in a rhinestone factory in South China. METHODS: We extracted and analysed data on new silicosis cases reported to China's occupational disease and occupational health information monitoring system between 2006 and 2012 from a rhinestone factory in South China. We measured the quartz content of bulk dust, static total and respirable dust samples. RESULTS: Ninety-eight silicosis cases were reported between 2006 and 2012. The mean duration of silica dust exposure was 9.2 years (range 3-16). Drilling and polishing workers accounted for 96 (98%) of cases. We collected 1479 static samples including 690 total dust and 789 respirable dust samples. Mean dust levels for drilling were 1.01 mg/m3 (range 0.20-3.80) for total dust and 0.51 mg/m3 (range 0.04-1.70) for respirable dust. Mean dust levels for polishing were 0.59 mg/m3 (range 0.20-2.10) for total dust and 0.28 mg/m3 (range 0.08-0.71) for respirable dust. Over a third [289/789 (37%)] of total dust samples and 129/690 (19%) respirable dust samples exceeded the national permissible exposure limit. CONCLUSION: Exposure to silica dust, ineffective dust control measures and inefficient health surveillance may have contributed to the incidence of silicosis in the factory we studied. Identification of silica dust exposure and effective dust control measures would reduce the risk of silicosis in rhinestone workers.
BACKGROUND:Silicosis is caused by long-term exposure to silica dust. Crystal rhinestone workers can be exposed to high levels of silica dust and are at risk of silicosis. AIMS: To explore silicosis cases, silica dust exposure and control measures in a rhinestone factory in South China. METHODS: We extracted and analysed data on new silicosis cases reported to China's occupational disease and occupational health information monitoring system between 2006 and 2012 from a rhinestone factory in South China. We measured the quartz content of bulk dust, static total and respirable dust samples. RESULTS: Ninety-eight silicosis cases were reported between 2006 and 2012. The mean duration of silica dust exposure was 9.2 years (range 3-16). Drilling and polishing workers accounted for 96 (98%) of cases. We collected 1479 static samples including 690 total dust and 789 respirable dust samples. Mean dust levels for drilling were 1.01 mg/m3 (range 0.20-3.80) for total dust and 0.51 mg/m3 (range 0.04-1.70) for respirable dust. Mean dust levels for polishing were 0.59 mg/m3 (range 0.20-2.10) for total dust and 0.28 mg/m3 (range 0.08-0.71) for respirable dust. Over a third [289/789 (37%)] of total dust samples and 129/690 (19%) respirable dust samples exceeded the national permissible exposure limit. CONCLUSION: Exposure to silica dust, ineffective dust control measures and inefficient health surveillance may have contributed to the incidence of silicosis in the factory we studied. Identification of silica dust exposure and effective dust control measures would reduce the risk of silicosis in rhinestone workers.