Literature DB >> 31504452

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Burkert Pieske1,2,3,4, Carsten Tschöpe1,2,5, Rudolf A de Boer6, Alan G Fraser7, Stefan D Anker1,2,5,8, Erwan Donal9, Frank Edelmann1,2, Michael Fu10, Marco Guazzi11,12, Carolyn S P Lam13,14, Patrizio Lancellotti15, Vojtech Melenovsky16, Daniel A Morris1, Eike Nagel17,18, Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher1, Piotr Ponikowski19, Scott D Solomon20, Ramachandran S Vasan21, Frans H Rutten22, Adriaan A Voors6, Frank Ruschitzka23, Walter J Paulus24, Petar Seferovic25, Gerasimos Filippatos26,27.   

Abstract

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HFpEF; Heart failure; biomarkers; diagnosis; echocardiography; exercise echocardiography; natriuretic peptides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31504452     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  196 in total

1.  Echocardiography derived intra-ventricular pressure gradients: a window to the temporal and spatial components of diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Georgios K Chalikias; Dimitrios N Tziakas
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  How to diagnose? How to treat? Dilemmas of the HFpEF.

Authors:  Piotr Hoffman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  On the search for the right definition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Karolina Kupczyńska; Piotr Dobrowolski; Błażej Michalski; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Waldemar Banasiak; Paweł Burchardt; Łukasz Chrzanowski; Szymon Darocha; Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz; Jarosław Drożdż; Marcin Fijałkowski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Marcin Gruchała; Ewa A Jankowska; Piotr Jankowski; Jarosław D Kasprzak; Wojciech Kosmala; Piotr Lipiec; Przemysław Mitkowski; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec; Piotr Szymański; Agnieszka Tycińska; Wojciech Wańha; Maciej Wybraniec; Adam Witkowski; Piotr Ponikowski; On Behalf Of "Club 30" Of The Polish Cardiac Society
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  The year in cardiology: heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Alexander R Lyon; Theresa McDonagh; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Chronic Heart Failure with Normal Contractility.

Authors:  Mircea Cinteza
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2019-09

Review 6.  Performance and Interpretation of Invasive Hemodynamic Exercise Testing.

Authors:  C Charles Jain; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Left atrial function in diabetes: does it help?

Authors:  Marijana Tadic; Cesare Cuspidi
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Incremental value of diastolic stress test in identifying subclinical heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Tomoko Nishi; Yukari Kobayashi; Jeffrey W Christle; Nicholas Cauwenberghs; Kalyani Boralkar; Kegan Moneghetti; Myriam Amsallem; Kristofer Hedman; Kévin Contrepois; Jonathan Myers; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Ingela Schnittger; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Latha Palaniappan; Francois Haddad
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Exercise stress echocardiography with ABCDE protocol in unexplained dyspnoea.

Authors:  Angela Zagatina; Nadezhda Zhuravskaya; Dmitry Shmatov; Quirino Ciampi; Clara Carpeggiani; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Pulmonary Vascular Pressures and Gas Exchange Response to Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Caitlin C Fermoyle; Glenn M Stewart; Barry A Borlaug; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.