Literature DB >> 31504266

Comprehensive autophagy evaluation in cardiac disease models.

Nina Kaludercic1, Maria Chiara Maiuri2, Susmita Kaushik3, Álvaro F Fernández4, Jenny de Bruijn5, Francesca Castoldi2, Yun Chen6, Jumpei Ito7, Risa Mukai8, Tomokazu Murakawa7, Jihoon Nah8, Federico Pietrocola9, Toshiro Saito10, Salwa Sebti4, Martina Semenzato11,12, Lorenza Tsansizi11,12, Sebastiano Sciarretta13,14, Julio Madrigal-Matute3.   

Abstract

Autophagy is a highly conserved recycling mechanism essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis. The pathophysiological role of autophagy has been explored since its discovery 50 years ago, but interest in autophagy has grown exponentially over the last years. Many researchers around the globe have found that autophagy is a critical pathway involved in the pathogenesis of cardiac diseases. Several groups have created novel and powerful tools for gaining deeper insights into the role of autophagy in the aetiology and development of pathologies affecting the heart. Here, we discuss how established and emerging methods to study autophagy can be used to unravel the precise function of this central recycling mechanism in the cardiac system. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autophagy; Autosis; Cardiac diseases; Chaperone-mediated autophagy; Heart; Mitophagy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31504266      PMCID: PMC7064050          DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


1. Introduction

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism driven by autophagy-related (ATG) proteins devoted to the intracellular recycling of almost every cytoplasmic element, such as senescent organelles and unfolded proteins. Three major types of autophagy exist: macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Macroautophagy refers to the formation of double-membrane vesicles called autophagosomes that engulf damaged, dysfunctional and redundant proteins, and organelles. Sequestered cargo is then delivered to lysosomes for its degradation. Depending on the cargo that is degraded, macroautophagy can be classified into several subtypes, including mitophagy for mitochondria, lipophagy for lipid droplets (LDs), or ERphagy for endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Microautophagy involves the direct engulfment of cytoplasmic cargo by lysosomes or vacuoles (in yeast and plants)., Although generally considered to be a non-selective process, microautophagy is also cargo-specific. Several types of selective microautophagy have been identified: micropexophagy (for peroxisomes), micromitophagy (for mitochondria), microlipophagy (for LDs), and piecemeal microautophagy (for nucleus portions). The third pathway is CMA, which entails the recognition of soluble proteins bearing a KFERQ-like amino acid sequence by the chaperone heat shock cognate 70 (HSC70). The targeted protein is translocated across the lysosomal membrane for degradation with the assistance of the CMA receptor, lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-2A). Autophagy contributes to the maintenance of cellular functions and survival in both lower organisms, plants, and mammals under basal conditions. Furthermore, this recycling mechanism ensures quality control and regulates the synthesis of new cellular components by providing amino acids, fatty acids, and sugars obtained from the turnover of superfluous cellular constituents. Recent evidence indicates that autophagy may also regulate cellular secretion and intracellular trafficking of specific cellular molecules. In addition, all autophagic pathways can be modulated under stress conditions. It has been demonstrated that a plethora of different stress stimuli (e.g. nutritional, metabolic, chemical, physical, etc.) can affect macroautophagy, microautophagy, and CMA regulation., Amongst the different subtypes of macroautophagy, mitophagy is the best characterized form of selective macroautophagy, and is responsible for the degradation of redundant or damaged mitochondria via their sequestration into autophagosomes. By maintaining the mitochondrial quality control, mitophagy helps to preserve cellular energy production and overall cell function and viability. Mitophagy is typically activated following hallmarks of mitochondrial damage: membrane potential (ΔΨm) collapse, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and low ATP levels. Changes in mitochondrial dynamics represent the first step in response to mitochondrial damage, and it is thought that mitochondrial fragmentation is a prerequisite for mitophagy to occur. Mitochondrial fusion and fission processes are mediated by different protein subsets. For instance, dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) and its adaptor proteins human fission protein (hFIS), mitochondrial dynamics proteins (MID49 and MID51), and mitochondrial fission factor (MFF) regulate mitochondrial division, while mitofusins 1 and 2 (MFN1, MFN2), and optic atrophy protein-1 (OPA1) control mitochondrial fusion. Thus, proteins that regulate mitochondrial dynamics also play essential roles in autophagy, and both in vitro and in vivo models have confirmed that mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy are indeed highly integrated processes.,,, Regarding the molecular effectors driving mitophagy, defective or senescent mitochondria are selectively targeted for degradation either through pathways that can be dependent or independent on PTEN-induced putative kinase1 (PINK1)-Parkin. PINK1/Parkin-independent mitophagy may constitute an adaptation to chronic Parkin loss and is mediated, in part, by mitochondrial BCL2 Interacting Protein 3 Like L (NIX/BNIP3L) that can directly bind to microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (MAP1LC3; best known as LC3) to form the mitophagosome.,, Studies suggest that the PINK1/Parkin-dependent pathway primarily functions as an inducible stress-response mechanism in the adult heart. Indeed, loss of ΔΨm results in the stabilization and accumulation of PINK1 at the mitochondria. PINK1 then phosphorylates the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) fusion protein MFN2 and promotes its ubiquitination by recruiting the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin onto the OMM, thereby initiating mitophagic clearance., Lipid autophagy (lipophagy), another subtype of macroautophagy, is involved in the catabolism of LDs, including neutral lipids (i.e. triglycerides, cholesterol). Lipophagy is characterized by the engulfment of small LDs or portions of large LDs by autophagosomes, which in turn deliver the lipid cargo to lysosomes, where it is degraded. Degradation products, such as non-esterified free fatty acids (FFAs), are then released into the cytoplasm and reused for other cellular purposes. Lipophagy plays a pivotal role in the regulation of lipid accumulation as well as in lipid homeostasis control. Although lipophagy was first described in the liver, it is now clear that it occurs in many other types of tissues and cells including neurons. This process is induced during fasting and is deregulated in numerous human pathologies, such as liver and neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. For example, previous work showed that the absence of Toll-interacting protein (Tollip), an innate immune molecule involved in the formation of autolysosomes, deregulates lipophagy and intensifies liver steatosis and atherosclerosis in mice. Several studies also revealed that lipophagy is involved in lipid synthesis, LD biogenesis, and adipogenesis. Uchiyama and colleagues demonstrated that the Atg conjugation system is critical for lipid synthesis and LD development in liver cells and cardiac myocytes. Moreover, in mice with liver ATG7 deficiency, a defective LC3 conjugation inhibited LD formation., Besides, mice with (global) ATG5- and adipose-specific ATG7-deficiency presented a reduction of adipose mass; depletion of Atg5 or Atg7 significantly inhibited adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells and mouse embryo fibroblasts. These results suggest that lipophagy regulates lipid accumulation in adipose tissue and controls adipocyte differentiation. Altogether, these data indicate that lipophagy prevents excess lipid accumulation and modulates lipid metabolism; for these reasons, we could assume that lipophagy should be a promising target for the treatment of cardiometabolic diseases such as atherosclerosis. Given these findings, one might expect that compromised autophagy and specific forms of macroautophagy are associated with the development of human diseases. In fact, defects in autophagy contribute to the development of cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, excessive lipid accumulation and metabolic defects, or inflammatory disorders. Moreover, autophagy is progressively altered in old age, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, which likely contributes to the abnormalities typically associated with these conditions. Along similar lines, alterations in the CMA pathway have extensively been tied to human diseases. In this regard, it is well known that CMA is required for the maintenance of cellular energetic balance via the finely tuned regulated degradation of enzymes involved in major metabolic routes and through the timely removal of structural proteins from the surface of LDs. Thus, it is not surprising that selective blockage of CMA alters cellular ATP levels and results in aberrant lipid accumulation and metabolic dysregulation. As CMA declines with age, this may contribute to increased susceptibility to stress in aging individuals and worsen age-related disorders., Furthermore, it has been shown that deficient CMA activity due to aging negatively affects the adaptive immune system. Reduced CMA activity has also been reported after high-fat/high-cholesterol diets and in several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus. The rising expansion of the western diets and the fact that our societies tend to have an increasing number of elderly leads to a growing interest in understanding the role of CMA in cardiac disease (CD). The purpose of this review is to discuss the evidence on the role of different forms of autophagy in the regulation of heart function and to describe the state-of-the-art approaches to study autophagy in cardiac pathophysiology. In particular, we will comprehensively discuss new tools and genetically modified animal models available for the investigation of the activity and function of autophagy/mitophagy and CMA during cardiac stress.

2. The role of autophagy in the heart

Autophagy plays unique, tissue-specific roles in maintaining homeostasis. In the recent years, a number of studies have demonstrated that autophagy is a major factor in the regulation of cardiac homeostasis under basal conditions and during cardiac adaptation to stress (Figure ). An overview of the role of autophagy in different cardiac conditions is outlined below. Autophagy and CD. Different stressors such as ischaemia, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysregulation are known to affect non-selective general autophagy, mitophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy and autosis, which in turn will adversely impact cardiac function to cause CD. Model depicts a converging paradigm wherein loss or exacerbation of distinct forms of autophagy results in the development of CD.

2.1 Autophagy: baseline vs. aging

Growing lines of evidence suggest that autophagy plays a pivotal role in preserving cardiac structure and function. Mice with inducible cardiomyocyte-specific Atg5 gene deletion display contractile dysfunction and left ventricular dilation, along with early mortality. At the cellular level, Atg5-deleted cardiomyocytes exhibit protein aggregation and mitochondrial dysfunction that likely contribute to heart failure. Autophagy is also required for delaying cardiac aging. Indeed, age-associated progressive loss in autophagic activity contributes to the development of cardiac senescence, hypertrophy, and diastolic dysfunction. Conversely, systemic overexpression of Atg5 and expression of a gain-of-function mutation of Beclin 1 increase levels of autophagy and extend lifespan in mice while reducing age-related cardiac fibrosis., In accordance with these data, it was also recently demonstrated that administration of spermidine, a natural polyamine, significantly reduces cardiac aging and extends lifespan through autophagy activation. In fact, when administered to cardiac-specific Atg7 knockout mice, spermidine failed to confer cardioprotection, indicating that this benefit is mediated via autophagy. Spermidine induces autophagy by inhibiting the activity of the acetyltransferase adenovirus early region 1A (E1A)-binding protein p300 (EP300),, a major repressor of autophagy. Autophagic clearance of mitochondria also appears to be reduced during aging. A reduction of p53-induced Parkin translocation to mitochondria represents one of the mechanisms underlying this mitophagy defect. Consistent with this idea, overexpression of Parkin has been shown to reduce age-associated cardiac abnormalities.

2.2 Autophagy in myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion

Cardiac tissue is exquisitely sensitive to ischaemia resulting from atherosclerotic blockage and/or thrombotic occlusion in one or more coronary arteries, a major cause of mortality worldwide. Autophagy and mitophagy each play pivotal roles in cellular homeostasis and adaptation to injury in the heart. Studies of CDs in animal models have shown that activation of autophagy in myocardium limits cardiac senescence, ischaemic injury, chronic cardiac remodelling, genetic cardiomyopathy, and heart failure., Similar beneficial effects are elicited when mitophagy is stimulated. During an ischaemic episode, activation of autophagy promotes quality control by degrading dysfunctional mitochondria and lowering ROS levels. Induction of autophagy also provides substrates for ATP production and thereby sustains cellular energy levels. Evidence for this notion comes from studies showing that cardiac-specific overexpression of a dominant-negative form of 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) or forced activation of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), through the overexpression of Ras homologue enriched in brain (RHEB), each inhibited autophagy and significantly exacerbated myocardial injury following prolonged ischaemia without reperfusion., Similarly, cardiac-specific deletion of Nox4, a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase isoform, showed impaired autophagy activation during ischaemia and increased ischaemic injury. While much is known about autophagy during ischaemia, the role of autophagy activation during reperfusion is largely unclear. When compared to ischaemic injury, reperfusion injury is mediated by distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Generally, during reperfusion, a marked accumulation of ROS is observed, contributing to the progression of myocardial injury. It has been shown that autophagy is stimulated during reperfusion through Beclin 1-dependent mechanisms. Accordingly, mice with systemic heterozygous Beclin 1 gene deletion displayed a significant reduction in ischaemic injury suggesting that Beclin 1-dependent upregulation of autophagy is deleterious during reperfusion. Consistent with this hypothesis, partial glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) inhibition reduced ischaemia/reperfusion injury via mTOR-dependent suppression of autophagy. In contrast, pharmacological inhibition of histone deacetylases decreased ischaemia/reperfusion injury through autophagy stimulation. Nevertheless, Ma et al. reported that autophagosomes accumulate in the heart in response to reperfusion injury as a result of the concomitant impairment in autophagic flux and increased autophagosome formation due to Beclin 1 induction. The authors showed that, beyond its primordial function in the initiation of the autophagic cascade, Beclin 1 expression can also be associated with a decrease in total LAMP-2 levels resulting in reduced autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Surprisingly, heterozygous Beclin 1 gene deletion normalized autophagosome levels, likely by supporting the efficient clearance of autophagosomes, and reduced reperfusion injury. All in all, the precise role of autophagy in ischaemia/reperfusion injury remains under debate. As previously discussed, the physiological level of autophagy activation in basal conditions or following an acute pathologic insult is generally considered cardioprotective. However, excessive or uncontrolled levels of autophagy activation possibly trigger cardiac cell death in some circumstances, thus contributing to myocardial injury. The so-called ‘autophagy-dependent cell death’ is a type of regulated cell death that relies on the autophagic machinery (or components thereof) as defined in the latest nomenclature for cell death guidelines. For instance, cardiac cell death is attenuated by autophagy inhibition in some stress conditions including ischaemia/reperfusion, pressure overload, and doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy, implicating a detrimental role of autophagy in the heart. Doxorubicin, a member of anthracyclines molecule class, has been used for a long time as an anti-neoplastic drug because of its ability to intercalate with DNA and inhibit topoisomerase II. Unfortunately, the therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin is limited by its severe side effects, particularly on the myocardium, resulting in arrhythmias, ventricular dysfunction, and heart failure. Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity is mostly caused by oxidative and ER stress, lipid peroxidation, calcium deregulation, and inhibition of the autophagic flux that leads to accumulation of autophagosomes/autolysosomes and undegraded material. However, whether autophagy really contributes to cardiomyocyte death is still controversial. Equally elusive are the morphological or biochemical features of cell death induced by autophagy. Recently, Dr Levine’s group provided evidence that excessive autophagy induces a unique type of autophagic cell death with characteristic morphological and biochemical features. This form of cell death, specifically relying on the Na+/K+-ATPase, was termed autosis. Consistent with the physiological relevance of this process, administration of Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitors, such as cardiac glycosides, confers neuroprotection in a rat model of neonatal hypoxiaischaemia. There is consensus that mitochondrial clearance limits ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the heart. Mice with cardiac-specific heterozygous deletion of DRP1, a mitochondrial fission protein, showed an increase in ischaemia/reperfusion injury that correlated with mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of mitophagy. Similarly, mice knocked-out for the mitochondrial protein phosphoglycerate mutase family member 5 (PGAM5), accelerated necroptosis in the heart following ischaemia/reperfusion injury. This effect occurred through the inhibition of mitophagy that caused mitochondrial abnormalities and oxidative stress. In accordance with its role as a stress-response mechanism, CMA has been shown to be activated during hypoxia/ischaemia and oxidative stress thus contributing to cell survival during these conditions., Consequently, it is plausible that changes in CMA (e.g. its decline associated with aging) may impact cardiac function in response to ischaemic and/or oxidative insults.

2.3 Autophagy during CD

Numerous studies have demonstrated that autophagy is necessary for the ability of the heart to respond to mechanical stress. Mice with cardiac-specific Atg5 gene deletion displayed cardiac hypertrophy, left ventricular dilation, and contractile dysfunction when subjected to transverse aortic constriction. This functional decline was paralleled by increased protein ubiquitination, disorganized sarcomere, and accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria in the heart. Indeed, partial activation of autophagy during severe mechanical stress is beneficial. In fact, Zhu et al. demonstrated that cardiac overexpression of Beclin 1 accentuates pathologic remodelling whereas heterozygous deletion of Beclin 1 gene blunts this process in mice subjected to severe pressure overload. It is now largely accepted that, during chronic ischaemic remodelling, autophagy activation exerts protective effects. Consistent with this notion, activation of autophagy by deleting mammalian STE20-like kinase 1 (Mst1) gene reduced infarct size, cardiac dysfunction, and dilation in response to chronic myocardial infarction. Trehalose, a natural disaccharide synthesized by simpler organisms and previously described as an autophagy inducer, is able to reduce chronic cardiac remodelling induced by myocardial infarction. These effects are autophagy-dependent since the beneficial effects of trehalose were in part attenuated in Beclin 1 mice. Aspirin is also an important drug for the secondary prevention of CD, reducing both the risk of CD and mortality., Interestingly, it was recently reported that aspirin and its active metabolite salicylate trigger autophagy via the inhibition of the EP300 activity, suggesting a novel molecular mechanism underlying the pro-health effects of these compounds. As one might expect, the benefits of autophagy in preventing chronic cardiac stress are mediated in part through mitophagy. In agreement with this idea, mice with cardiac-specific Drp1 gene knockout display impaired mitophagy in response to pressure overload and develop mitochondrial dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy, and heart failure. Mitophagy is also involved in cardiac hypertrophy after myocardial infarction. Indeed, Kubli et al. demonstrated the presence of cardiac hypertrophy and larger infarct sizes in Parkin-deficient mice after myocardial infarction. Accordingly, wild-type animals were characterized by increased Parkin expression and stimulation of mitophagy in areas bordering the myocardial infarct. Interestingly, autophagy-mediated mitochondrial turnover/quality control is important to reduce the amount of mitochondrial DNA released from the injured tissue, which is thought to drive myocardial inflammation and heart failure during mechanical stress.

2.4 Autophagy and metabolic cardiomyopathy

Several studies have investigated the impact of diabetes on autophagy in the heart. The majority of these studies have demonstrated that metabolic alterations impact cardiac autophagy at multiple steps. Under pathological conditions, cardiac autophagy and mitophagy are both inhibited in models of diabetes and metabolic syndrome, likely with deleterious consequences., Decreased myocardial autophagy was reported at basal levels and in response to ischaemia in mice fed with high-fat diet (HFD). A reduction of cardiac autophagy was also detected in the heart of hypercholesterolaemic pigs., Reactivation of autophagy via rapamycin administration partially rescued the deleterious effect of HFD on ischaemic injury. Levine and Mentzer labs each observed a significant reduction in autophagosome formation in mice with HFD-induced obesity. Other studies corroborated these findings by demonstrating that HFD inhibits autophagosome formation in the heart, which can be reversed by a number of interventions including macrophage migration inhibitory factor (Mif) gene disruption, overexpression of catalase, and ablation of the toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) gene. Consistent with this notion, cardiac autophagic flux is impaired in hearts of mice with type II diabetes. Indeed, autophagosome clearance is significantly suppressed in hearts of mice fed with HFD. Similarly, autophagosome maturation was found to be impaired in obese mice due to AKT2-dependent mTOR activation, a well-established inhibitor of autophagy. Both type I and type II diabetes are associated with reduced cardiac autophagy. However, the functional consequence of such impairment remains under-explored. Since AMPK activity leads to induction of autophagy, numerous studies have explored the effect of AMPK on cardiac function and found that AMPK activation improves cardiac function by reactivating autophagy in the heart., The mechanisms through which this occurs remain unclear, but it may involve improved fuel utilization and fuel-type switch in the face of acute myocardial injury. There are contrasting studies suggesting that decreasing levels of a subset of autophagy proteins protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy. For example, overexpression of Beclin 1 exacerbates diabetic cardiomyopathy, while inhibiting Atg16 gene attenuates cardiac derangements in mice with type I diabetes. Surprisingly, inhibition of Atg16 gene expression restores mitophagy (likely in an ATG16-independent manner) in diabetic mice through the upregulation of PINK1 and Parkin, suggesting that stimulation of mitophagy could be a potential therapeutic approach against diabetic cardiomyopathy. CMA selectively degrades not only enzymes involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism but also proteins important for mitochondrial homeostasis. Indeed, CMA activity is compromised in mice with HFD-induced obesity. The decline in CMA activity in these lipogenic stress conditions is due to changes in the lipids at the lysosomal membrane, resulting in decreased stability of the CMA receptor LAMP-2A. Interestingly, these HFD-triggered changes of the lysosomal membrane composition resemble those observed in aging. Given the metabolic relevance of this autophagic pathway, the role of CMA in cardiomyocytes is currently the focus of investigation.

2.5 Mutations in human ATG genes associated with CD

Several mutations in genes linked to or required for autophagy and lysosomal function are associated with the development of CDs. Among them, the mutation in the LAMP-2 gene that causes Danon’s cardiomyopathy is perhaps the best characterized one., In this regard, the pathological hallmark of the disease is the accumulation of intracytoplasmic vacuoles containing autophagic material and glycogen in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells. Recessive mutations in Ectopic P-Granules autophagy protein 5 homologue (EPG5), a key factor implicated in the autophagolysosomal fusion and maturation of autolysosomes, play a causative role in Vici syndrome., This is a recessively inherited multisystem disorder characterized by callosal agenesis, cataracts, hypopigmentation, cardiomyopathy, psychomotor retardation, and immunodeficiency with cleft lip and palate. Mutations in GBA1, gene encoding the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase, result in defects in autophagic-lysosomal function. GBA1 loss of function is responsible for the Gaucher’s disease, in which glucocerebroside accumulates in cells and organs. Gaucher’s disease type 3C is also defined as the cardiovascular form; cardiovascular abnormalities consist of calcification of the ascending aorta and of the aortic and mitral valves, leading to reduced lifespan. From a cardiometabolic point of view, a recent study identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms in several autophagy genes, such as ATG7, MAP1LC3A, ATG3, ULK1, or different ATG4s, associated with alterations in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and coronary artery disease. Moreover, exclusive DNA sequence variants of ATG7 gene promoter have been recently found in acute myocardial infarction patients.

3. Methods for the assay of different forms of autophagy

In the following sections, several techniques useful for the adequate and precise study of the different forms of autophagy are described (Table ). Methods for the assay of different forms of autophagy Double-membrane structures (autophagosomes); Single-membrane, electron dense vacuoles (autolysosomes)

3.1 Non-selective general autophagy

In the 1950s, autophagy and lysosomal biology were largely studied at the morphological/ultrastructural level by electron microscopy (EM) or at the biochemical level by determining the degradation of long-lived proteins. In the 1990s, ATG molecules were identified using simpler systems (yeast cells) and genetic approaches, and since then, the analysis of autophagy has undergone significant advances. In principle, given that autophagic degradation is a highly dynamic process, and because of differences in the rates of cargo degradation across different cell types and in response to various stressors, the assessment of autophagy requires the measurement of autophagic flux involving the use of lysosomal inhibitors. Nevertheless, given the dynamic nature of the autophagic process, multiple complementary approaches should be considered for its evaluation. A common strategy is to estimate the number of autophagosomes by observing and quantifying their number. However, the net/steady-state level of autophagosomes in a given moment is the balance between the rate of their generation and degradation. This underscores the need for measuring the complete flux for accurate assessment of autophagy activity. Monitoring the number of autophagosomes is typically carried out by EM, fluorescence detection of LC3, and biochemical assays as discussed below.

3.1.1 Electron microscopy

Despite new methods have been developed to study autophagy, EM remains the gold standard to analyse the ultrastructural details of autophagic structures to date (Figure ). Electron microscopy analysis of autophagic structures. Three-month old male C57BL/6 mice were subjected to 30 min ischaemia and 2 h reperfusion, and hearts with infarction border area were analysed by electron microscopy. Representative images indicate an autophagosome (arrowhead), an autolysosome (arrow), and a lysosome (asterisk). Scale bar: 2 µm. An autophagosome is a double-membrane structure generated from an isolation membrane at distinct sites in the cell, though it is still unknown which cellular structures contribute to the formation of autophagosomes. These vesicles, as discussed earlier, sequester cargo and deliver it to lysosomes. EM images of an autophagosome typically reveal a double-membrane vacuole with a clear gap between the two membranes (Figure , arrow). EM is also used to determine the nature of the contents sequestered, allowing to distinguish between autophagosomes and those that have already fused with lysosomes (Figure , asterisk). Ultrastructural analyses reveal that sequestered organelles are largely intact in autophagosomes and allow for visualization of individual mitochondria engulfed during mitophagy. Mitochondria sequestered within autophagosomes can be readily detected through identification of cristae enclosed within the double-membrane autophagosomes. However, autophagosome fusion with lysosomes (forming the autolysosomes) leads to the rapid digestion of the cargo, which is apparent by the presence of material at various stages of degradation. Since the inner autophagosomal membrane is digested upon fusion with lysosomes (Figure , arrowhead), an autolysosome is typically observed as a single-membrane vacuole with an amorphous structure and high electron density. Indeed, late stage mitophagy is reflected by the single-membrane autolysosomes with residual mitochondria that might be difficult to identify. Immunogold EM for specific mitochondrial markers could also help confirm the nature of mitochondria in these late stages of mitophagy. Although EM is a powerful tool to evaluate the ultrastructural details of autophagic structures, it does not allow to determine whether autophagy is active or suppressed. In addition, this time-consuming approach is subject to possible artefacts in case fixation of samples and tissue sectioning have been inappropriately performed. Moreover, it may be difficult to preserve the integrity of the membranes. The ferrocyanide-reduced osmium method has proven useful for the preservation and contrast of membranous structures, and thus, is a method of choice for the detection of autophagosomes and autolysosomes. However, caution must be exerted when visualizing representative areas in a reasonably large number of replicates as this method is largely non-quantitative due to the limited numbers of sections and cells, and in differentiating autophagic structures from organelles such as rough ER, swollen mitochondria, and vacuoles of uncertain origin. Thus, EM must be used in combination with other assays for the accurate assessment of autophagic activity.

3.1.2 Fluorescence microscopy

The identification of LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Atg8 and the molecular marker of autophagosomes, undoubtedly facilitated autophagy monitoring. Pro-LC3, the unprocessed form of LC3, undergoes proteolytic cleavage by ATG4, which converts pro-LC3 to LC3-I. LC3-I is the soluble cytosolic form of LC3. Upon autophagic stimulus, LC3-I is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) through a ubiquitin-like reaction, resulting in the formation of LC3-II, the membrane-bound form of LC3. LC3-II is the only protein that specifically localizes to autophagosomes throughout the process, from the formation of the isolation membrane to its lysosomal degradation. Therefore, assessing LC3 lipidation is the most accurate way to follow the process of autophagy., Consequently, the development of modern tools to study autophagy evolved around LC3. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the N-terminus of LC3 (GFP-LC3) is broadly used as an autophagosome reporter. GFP-LC3 is thought to behave in the same way as the endogenous LC3. When expressed in cells, GFP-LC3 distributes diffusely throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus reflecting the soluble LC3-I form. Upon autophagy induction, punctate LC3 signals can be observed in the cytoplasm, representing the autophagosome-bound LC3. Therefore, increases in autophagosome content are reflected by the number of LC3 puncta per cell or the number of cells with an augmented number of LC3 puncta, as compared to cells maintained in the basal/non-stimulated state. Since ATG5 is required for the conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II, LC3-positive punctate structures do not form in Atg5-deficient cells or in cells expressing LC3 mutated at the amino acid residue required for PE conjugation, indicating the specificity of GFP-LC3 in measuring autophagosome levels. This molecule is also useful for tracking the formation, localization, and turnover of autophagosomes in live cells. The identification of LC3 as an autophagosome marker and the development of tools based on the specificity provided by LC3 is a great advantage over the use of EM. There are, however, several pitfalls in monitoring autophagy activity using the GFP-LC3 reporter. First, since GFP itself can be aggregate-prone, LC3-positive aggregates may be misinterpreted as true LC3 puncta. Also, LC3 may bind to other membranes in the cell. Thus, complementary analysis should be performed to further confirm its presence in autophagosomes. This is particularly true when GFP-LC3 is transiently overexpressed or co-expressed with other aggregation-prone proteins. To circumvent this issue, the use of transformants that stably express GFP-LC3 is highly recommended. Protein aggregates in cells could also cause LC3 puncta formation through the incorporation of p62/sequestosome1 (SQSTM1), a well-established cargo adapter for autophagy. More importantly, as mentioned in the EM section, the number of autophagosomes calculated from GFP-LC3 puncta do not reflect autophagic activity. In other words, GFP-LC3 only reveals the steady-state levels of LC3 but not autophagy activity or flux. This problem can be solved by assessing autophagy flux. In context of fluorescence-based approaches, a construct that combines a red fluorescent protein with GFP-LC3 (mRFP-GFP-LC3) wherein mRFP and GFP are tandemly fused to the N-terminus of LC3 is a useful tool for measurement of autophagy flux (Figure ). Upon delivery of the reporter to the lysosome, the GFP signal is quenched by the low pH/acidic environment. In contrast, the RFP is acid-stable and continues to fluoresce in the acidic environment. Using this construct, yellow (merged RFP and GFP signal) puncta indicate autophagosomes while red (RFP-positive and GFP-negative) puncta indicate autolysosomes. When both yellow and red puncta are increased, autophagic flux is considered to be high; however, robust autophagy induction is also reflected by a significant increase in red puncta, while the yellow puncta are unaffected in number. On the other hand, increases or no changes in yellow puncta without an accompanying increase in the red punctate signal indicate that autophagy flux/activity is blocked (Figure ). Cardiac-specific-tandem-fluorescence mRFP-GFP-LC3 (tf-LC3): (A) three-month-old male C57BL/6 transgenic mice expressing cardiac-specific-tandem-fluorescence mRFP-GFP-LC3 (tf-LC3) were subjected to 30 min ischaemia and hearts with infarction border area were analysed by confocal microscopy to assess autophagic flux (scale bar: 10 µm). (B) The quantification of autophagosomes (yellow puncta) and autolysosomes (red puncta) is shown (mean values ± SE, n = 3; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. sham). In addition to the genetic approaches mentioned above, fluorescent small molecules can also be used to visualize autophagosomes and monitor autophagy. Though these probes are easy to use without the need for genetic engineering, there are limitations such as low specificity, cytotoxicity, the relative lack of information on materials and methodology for their optimal use across different systems, as well as the requirement of specialized instruments/training in generating these molecules. Recently, novel small molecule probes DALGreen and DAPGreen that stain autophagosomes were developed. It appears that the terminal amino group of DALGreen and DAPGreen is necessary for the incorporation of these dyes into the autophagosomal membrane by mimicking intramembrane phospholipids such as phosphatidylethanolamine. DAPGreen detects both autophagosomes and autolysosomes given that it is incorporated into the autophagosome during double-membrane formation and emits fluorescence under hydrophobic conditions without being affected by the pH. On the other hand, the fluorescence of DALGreen is enhanced in the acidic pH range and is suitable for monitoring autophagy activity/flux. It is likely that in the future, these probes could find wide use in the evaluation of autophagy across diverse model systems.

3.1.3 Flow cytometry

In the recent past, conventional or multispectral imaging flow cytometry have been proposed as alternative approaches for the high-throughput assessment of autophagic flux in live or fixed cells., These methodologies, which have been optimized for cells growing in suspension or circulating leukocytes, account for the study of autophagy dynamics in a large number of cells. The imaging flow cytometry combines the statistical power of flow cytometry with the information content of fluorescent microscopy. Associating the flow cytometry analysis of autophagic flux with that of other parameters such as cellular morphology, complexity, and (as in the case of concomitant detection of surface markers) phenotype, permits to accurately capture cell type-specific heterogeneity in autophagy levels. Flow cytometry monitoring of autophagic flux relies on the expression of GFP-LC3 probe by target cells. Since GFP-LC3 is targeted for lysosomal degradation, total fluorescence intensity of GFP-LC3 can be used as a proxy to infer autophagy levels in cells; in conditions of autophagy induction (i.e. starvation) total GFP fluorescence intensity decreases. Alternatively, transient extraction with saponin (which depletes from cells soluble GFP-LC3I but not autophagosome-bound GFP-LC3II) can be performed prior to flow cytometry analysis; in this second scenario, an increase in GFP residual fluorescence will indicate an upregulation of the autophagic activity. In both settings, autophagy-inducing treatments should be compared in presence or absence of lysosomal inhibitors (see below) for an accurate measurement of autophagic flux. In line with these observations, a recent work has demonstrated that flow cytometry assessment of GFP-LC3 fluorescence could be successfully adopted to monitor autophagy in HL-1 cardiomyocytes. Despite the potential application of flow cytometry to monitor autophagic flux, these strategies are currently under used. In most of the cases, these methods only allow to measure global changes in GFP-LC3 levels, regardless of its transcriptional or translational fluctuations. In addition, preparation of single cell suspensions of adherent cells or saponin extraction procedures impose elevated levels of stress to target cells, which in turn may lead to autophagy induction secondary to treatment. To bypass this issue, it is highly recommended to stain cells with viability dyes and to carefully titrate saponin concentration in order to minimize cellular toxicity and GFP-LC3 self-aggregation.

3.1.4 Biochemical assays

LC3 is commonly used to assess autophagosome number and autophagy activity also via biochemical approaches. The conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II, reflecting LC3 lipidation, is easily detectable by immunoblotting. The hydrophobicity of lipidated LC3-II increases its electrophoretic mobility in the SDS-PAGE, causing its separation from LC3-I. However, pro-LC3 (which is recognized by commercially available antibodies) also shows higher electrophoretic mobility than LC3-I and may be mistaken with LC3-II. Thus, it is always important to get a good separation of the bands using specific gels (e.g. Tris-glycine or gradient gels), as well as trying to visualize both LC3-I and LC3-II bands, as it will confirm the correct lipidation of LC3. Whatever the case may be, the amount of LC3-II correlates well with the number of autophagosomes in the cell. Although some investigators recommend the use of polyvinylidene difluoride membrane with 0.20 µm pore size for the immunoblotting of LC3, nitrocellulose membrane provides sufficient sensitivity to distinguish between differences in LC3-II in different samples. Most importantly, it is necessary to perform complete autophagic flux assays (Figure ), which will evaluate whether the increased number of autophagosomes is due to autophagy induction (Figure , scenario 1) or is rather a consequence of an impairment in autophagosome-lysosome fusion or blocked degradation in lysosomes (Figure , scenario 2). The differences in the intensity (densitometric values) of LC3-II between samples in the presence or absence of lysosomal inhibitors represent autophagic flux. For this purpose, inhibitors of lysosomal proteases such as bafilomycin A (that blocks autophagosome-lysosome fusion), or a combination of ammonium chloride (a base that dissipates lysosomal pH) and leupeptin (inhibitor of lysosomal proteases), as well as E64 and pepstatin A, are commonly used. Ex vivo flux of the tissue of interest can also be used to assess the autophagic activity (Figure ). Chloroquine and NH4Cl/Leupeptin have been successfully used to block lysosomal degradation in cardiac cells. In primary cultures of adult mouse cardiomyocytes or neonatal rat ventricular myocytes, it is sufficient to treat the cells 2–4 h prior to cell lysis either with 50 µM chloroquine, 50 nM bafilomycin A, or 20 mM/100 µM NH4Cl/leupeptin ( and data not published). It is important that chloroquine and ammonium chloride solutions are freshly prepared each time. To inhibit the autophagic flux in vivo, different groups have used chloroquine concentrations ranging from 10 to 50 mg/kg injected i.p. in mice 4–6 h before sample collection., Another study reported the use of bafilomycin A for in vivo experiments; mice were injected with 6 µmol/kg i.p. and sacrificed after 30 min.. In these in vivo experiments it is essential to synchronize autophagy induction/suppression in the animals by starvation/re-feeding regimen (24 h of starvation plus 3 h of feeding) thereby reducing the variability due to differences in food intake. The evaluation of autophagic substrates protein levels may also be used to study autophagy flux in combination with additional supporting methods. However, caution should be exercised regarding the inclusion of controls to confirm that changes in levels of these additional proteins in response to a given treatment are not due to alterations in gene expression. One such protein is p62/SQSTM1, a well-studied autophagy substrate which directly binds to LC3 and is degraded by autophagy. One concern is that p62/SQSTM1 can also be degraded by the proteasome;, consequently, the assessment of autophagy flux/activity must be done in the presence of lysosomal inhibitors. In principle, the protein level of p62/SQSTM1 is considered to inversely correlate with autophagic activity. However, levels of p62/SQSTM1 are also transcriptionally regulated during autophagy and/or in response to stressors,, which may be misinterpreted as an increase in autophagic activity. Alternatively, information about autophagic flux status can accurately be inferred by monitoring the degradation of radioactively or non-radioactively labelled long-lived proteins. Autophagic flux in vivo and ex vivo via LC3 immunoblot. (A) In vivo flux. Mice (control or relevant test condition) can be injected with vehicle or leupeptin (30 mg/kg i.p.) 2 h before harvesting. Collected tissue(s) can be processed for SDS-PAGE and immunoblot for LC3. (B). Ex vivo flux. Tissue(s) harvested from a mouse can be cut into 0.5 cm3 explants and cultured in media under control or test conditions with vehicle or lysosomal inhibitors (Lys Inh) at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 2 h with occasional swirling. Then, they can be processed for SDS-PAGE and immunoblot for LC3. (C). Schematic representation of LC3 blots depicting increased (left), decreased (middle), or unchanged (right) autophagic flux. Autophagic flux or LC3-II flux is calculated by subtracting the density values (after actin normalization) of + Lys Inh and control for each condition.

3.2 Mitophagy

Several approaches and molecular tools have been established to study mitophagy both in neonatal and adult cardiomyocytes, or other cell types in the heart (for instance, cardiac fibroblasts). The most commonly used methods to study mitophagy in cells assess changes in mitochondrial mass, ultrastructural changes in mitochondria via transmission EM (described in Section 3.1), and fluorescence microscopy for colocalization of mitochondria with autophagosomes or lysosomes., More recently, several novel assays have been developed, including MitoTimer, Mito-Keima, and Mito-QC, as discussed in Section 4.2. Importantly, these assays can be used to monitor and quantify mitophagy in vivo in diverse tissues.

3.2.1 Assessment of mitochondrial mass

Analysis of mitochondrial mass is the most reliable readout of mitophagy. This can be done by immunoblotting, measuring the relative amount of mitochondrial proteins in relation to levels of classical cellular protein loading markers. It is recommended to cover all mitochondrial compartment proteins, including the outer [e.g. translocase of outer membrane-20 (TOM20), voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein (VDAC)] and inner mitochondrial membrane proteins [such as cytochrome C oxidase (COX) or ADP/ATP translocase 1 (ANT)], intermembrane space (cytochrome C), and matrix proteins [manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), heat shock protein-60 (HSP60)]. This precaution is justified by the fact that some OMM proteins are degraded by the proteasome and are therefore not reliable markers of mitophagy, while others have been identified as substrates for CMA. In this regard, measurement of citrate synthase activity, a citric acid cycle enzyme generally not affected by the depletion of mtDNA or respiratory chain inhibition, is frequently used to measure mitochondrial mass in cells and tissues. Nevertheless, it must be considered that citrate synthase is one of the citric acid cycle enzymes identified as a CMA substrate. In addition, quantitative PCR can be used to quantify mitochondrial-to-nuclear DNA ratio, using 16S rRNA as an index of mtDNA, and hexokinase 2 for nuclear DNA. However, in order to interpret these results correctly, it is essential to assess mitochondrial biogenesis as well, to ensure that it is not impaired. It must be also noted that high levels of mitophagy may be required to detect net loss of mitochondrial proteins.

3.2.2 Fluorescence-based approaches

Fluorescence microscopy for colocalization of mitochondria with autophagosomes and lysosomes helps with the assessment of the degree to which the autophagic machinery sequesters and degrades mitochondria in the presence of a stressor. Co-labelling with GFP-LC3 and MitoTracker Red (for live cells) or immunostaining for mitochondrial proteins such as TOM20, VDAC, or COX-IV with antibodies (for fixed cells) offers information regarding colocalization between mitochondria and GFP-LC3-positive autophagosomes. Quantitative colocalization provides information on the degree of sequestration and serves as a marker for mitophagy. In addition, co-labelling for mitochondria and lysosomes using either LysoTracker or antibodies directed against lysosomal protein (LAMPs for instance) can be used as another assay for the assessment of mitophagy through colocalization of mitochondria with lysosomal markers. Although these assays may indicate the association of mitochondria with LC3-positive autophagosomes or lysosomes, mitochondrial degradation can only be confirmed following addition of lysosomal inhibitors. As discussed above, the propensity of GFP-LC3 to form aggregates requires caution since not all puncta will necessarily represent autophagosomes. The combination of electron and fluorescence microscopy tends to facilitate the interpretation of results related to the localization of LC3-positive double membranes around mitochondria. Given its complexity, one assay is unlikely to provide a clear picture of the biology so it is recommended to use complementary approaches for its assessment.

3.3 Chaperone-mediated autophagy

3.3.1 CMA components

Determining the abundance and distribution of key CMA components and CMA-active lysosomes can be used as an indirect way to quantify CMA activity, but these methods yield only snapshots and should be complemented with functional assays. Lysosomal LAMP-2A is rate-limiting for CMA and changes in LAMP-2A levels usually correlate with CMA activity. Nonetheless, not all LAMP-2A-positive lysosomes are equipped for CMA, as lysosomal HSC-70 (lys-HSC70) needs to be present as well, which is the case for 30% of LAMP-2A-positive lysosomes under basal conditions in organs such as liver. Additionally, lysosomal LAMP-2A levels are proportional to CMA activity and thus blotting lysosome-enriched fractions or membranous cell fractions is superior to blotting whole cell lysates. Given the sole involvement of LAMP-2A in CMA, antibodies specific for LAMP-2A should be utilized, rather than total LAMP-2 (that recognize the three isoforms of the lamp-2 gene—LAMP-2A, LAMP-2B, and LAMP-2C). CMA activation often occurs without de novo synthesis of LAMP-2A, but in some conditions such as oxidative stress,, hypoxia, or genotoxic stress it is transcriptionally upregulated. Thus, LAMP-2A mRNA could be proportional to CMA activity; however, absence of changes in LAMP-2A mRNA does not necessarily mean that CMA is not altered. Regarding HSC70, total cellular levels measured via immunoblot or mRNA quantification are not informative of the CMA status. Assessment of lys-HSC70 in lysosomal fractions is more helpful than analyses of whole cell lysates. It is important to note that, when analysing lys-HSC70 in lysosome-enriched fractions, one should use antibodies specifically recognizing HSC70 and not HSP70.

3.3.2 Functional assays to track CMA activity

Comprehensive assessment of CMA activity in cells, tissues, and organelles requires tracking this pathway over time. Below we detail a number of assays to determine CMA activity.

3.3.2.1 CMA reporter

The use of photoconvertible CMA reporters is a good approach to assess CMA activity since it can be performed in intact cells, even with limited sample size (Figure ). The principle behind this assay is the use of a photo-switchable protein that contains the KFERQ motif. Upon exposure to 405 nm light, it becomes possible to distinguish the photo-converted protein from the newly synthesized protein. Upon CMA activation in response to a given treatment, the fluorescent protein localizes to lysosomal membranes giving rise to visible fluorescent puncta. The number of puncta per cell is indicative of CMA activity (Figure ). The CMA reporter ceases to fluoresce upon reaching the lysosomal lumen because of the unfolding required for the translocation across the lysosomal membrane and its rapid degradation inside the organelle. Consequently, this assay is only indicative of the binding step in the CMA pathway. One key advantage is that the pulse-chase nature of this assay allows testing CMA activity in response to different conditions and therapeutics. KFERQ-Dendra reporter to measure CMA activity. (A) Scheme of the experimental design to monitor CMA activity in cultured cells using the KFERQ–Dendra2 reporter. (B) NIH-3T3 cells expressing the Dendra2-KFERQ photoswitchable CMA reporter cultured in the presence (top panel and magnification) or absence (lower panel and magnification) of serum. Scale bar: 20 µm.

3.3.2.2 Lysosomal uptake

The most reliable method to assess CMA activity is reconstituting the process with isolated lysosomes that contribute exclusively to CMA. This in vitro assay uses intact lysosomes, pretreated or not with lysosomal protease inhibitors (PI), and incubated with a known CMA substrate such as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or ribonuclease A (RNase A). Samples are centrifuged after the incubation and the subsequent immunoblot for the CMA substrate used is a measure of the amount of substrate either bound to lysosomal membrane (those untreated with PI) or associated with lysosomes (those pretreated with PI). The amount of substrate translocated into the lysosomal lumen can be calculated by subtracting the amount of bound substrate from the total amount of substrate associated with lysosomes.

3.3.2.3 Metabolic labelling

Pulse and chase experiments can be used to track the degradation of potential CMA substrates by using radio-labelled amino acids 3H-leucine or 3H-valine in conjunction with inhibitors of either lysosomal proteases or macroautophagy to distinguish between macroautophagy and CMA-sensitive proteolysis. For example, contrary to macroautophagy, CMA is insensitive to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PtdIns3K) inhibitors. When using inhibitors of macroautophagy, it must be noted that prolonged blockage of macroautophagy leads to an upregulation in CMA. Thus, analyses of activity of these pathways should be assessed at early time-points (<24 h). Otherwise, the fraction of cellular proteins degraded through CMA could be overestimated.

3.3.2.4 Immunofluorescence

Changes in the number of CMA-active lysosomes is an indirect measurement of CMA activity. Co-staining via immunofluorescence or use of dual immunogold staining for HSC70 and LAMP-2A usually offers good correlation with CMA activity. As previously stated, increases in LAMP-2A or lys-HSC70 levels positively correlate with CMA activity.,

3.4 Autosis

Although autophagy is often triggered as a pro-survival pathway, it may lead to cell death in specific conditions. In fact, several studies demonstrated how autophagy repression may ameliorate some pathological alterations in CD. For this reason, it is important to further explore the possible role of autosis in cardiac pathologies. Unique morphological features characterize this type of cell death, including accumulation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes, disappearance of intracellular organelles, nuclear convolution, and characteristic expansion of the perinuclear space (Figure ). Therefore, EM analysis remains the best method to detect autotic cells. In this regard, both the early phase (intense vacuolization) and the late phase (swollen perinuclear space and nuclear concavity) have been described in some pathological conditions in vivo (rat brain or human liver) using this technique., It is important to distinguish autosis features from the ones present in endothelial cells, such as the concavity of the nucleus. Immunofluorescence analysis could help in the identification of autotic cells, for instance detecting ER fragmentation and nuclear concavity., Nevertheless, double membranes are not discernible with this technique, as it would be impossible to distinguish the swelling of the perinuclear space from a random alteration in the shape of the whole nucleus. Autosis. Schematic diagram and representative images of the different phases of autosis in HeLa cells, showing the most characteristic features of this type of cell death. Images from Liu and Levine licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Little is known about the complete molecular pathway underlying autosis, along with possible biochemical markers that could help in the identification and quantitation of this type of cell death. However, a unique feature of autosis is its dependency on autophagy proteins and the Na+, K+-ATPase. In this regard, another way to confirm autotic cell death relies on the blockage of this process by depleting ATGs or inhibiting Na+, K+-ATPase.

4. Animal models for the study of autophagy and CD

In the following sections, we discuss the animal models useful for studying autophagy in the context of CD (Table ). Genetic mouse models employed for the study of different macroautophagy forms in the cardiac system

4.1 Non-selective general autophagy

Mouse models for the measurement of autophagy in vivo have been established to precisely monitor the autophagic process. Transgenic mice expressing GFP fused to the autophagosome marker LC3 were generated in 2004 by Dr Noboru Mizushima in Dr Yoshinori Ohsumi’s group. Expression of GFP-LC3 did not affect autophagy per se, and these mice do not exhibit an abnormal phenotype. Since then, the GFP-LC3 transgenic mice have been widely used to evaluate and measure autophagy by fluorescence microscopy in multiple tissues, including the heart. Autophagosomes are visualized as puncta or vesicles labelled by GFP. However, treatment of these mice with lysosomal inhibitors to inhibit the degradation of autophagic vesicles is required to accurately assess the autophagy flux. Other mouse models have been developed to better visualize the autophagy process and to overcome the limitation of GFP fluorescence typically quenched by the low lysosomal pH. The mRFP-GFP-LC3 tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3 reporter mouse allows for the detection of autophagosomes labelled with both mRFP and pEGFP (Figure )., This tool has been useful to monitor autophagic activity during cardiac injury through cardiomyocyte-specific expression of mRFP-GFP-LC3 reporter (Figure ). More recently, GFP-LC3-RFP-LC3ΔG fluorescent probe was designed to monitor autophagic flux in vitro and in vivo. Upon cleavage by endogenous ATG4, equimolar amounts of GFP-LC3 and RFP-LC3ΔG are generated. GFP-LC3 is degraded through autophagy, whereas RFP-LC3ΔG is not and remains in the cytosol, acting as an internal control. The GFP/RFP ratio reflects autophagic flux. Besides monitoring autophagy with reporter mice, the function of autophagy in tissues has been analysed using genetically engineered mice deficient in key autophagy genes. Knockout mice for non-redundant Atgs are lethal in the neonatal or embryonic stage. Consequently, conditional tissue-specific Atg gene knockout mice have been developed to assess the contribution of autophagy to diverse pathophysiological conditions. For example, cardiac-specific Atg5 knockout mice revealed the importance of autophagy in preserving cardiac function. Autophagy has also been investigated in adult mice at the whole body level. Mice heterozygous for the loss of the autophagy gene Beclin 1 have significantly reduced autophagy activity. These mice have been used to study autophagy in models of ischaemia/reperfusion and sepsis in the heart, demonstrating important cardioprotective roles of autophagy.,, Similar to the Beclin 1 deficient animals, ATG16L1 hypomorphic mice, or animals lacking autophagins (the mammal orthologues of yeast Atg4s), exhibit decreased levels of autophagy., Other approaches include the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-mediated deletion of floxed Atg5 or Atg7 alleles, leading to selective and temporal deletion of autophagy genes in adulthood. Using this strategy, autophagy activity is inhibited within 1–2 weeks of treatment with tamoxifen, following which these mice begin to show tissue-specific abnormalities over a period of few weeks. Another approach is to study the pathophysiological consequences of increased basal autophagy activity in mice. For instance, transgenic mice overexpressing Atg5 have been developed; however, it is unclear whether and how autophagy is indeed increased in these mice since, although required for the autophagy to occur, ATG5 is not involved in the regulation of autophagy levels. More recent studies have described the Beclin 1-F121A knock-in mice, expressing a mutation in the BH3 domain of Beclin 1 that leads to constitutively increased basal autophagy in multiple tissues.,, The Beclin 1-F121A mice with increased levels of autophagy throughout adulthood have an increased lifespan and improved healthspan including decreased age-associated cardiac alterations. On a similar note, cardiac-specific transgenic mice overexpressing Beclin 1 have also been developed and show increase in stress-induced autophagy.,

4.2 Mitophagy

Currently, the large majority of mitophagy studies monitor the colocalization of mitochondrial probes with typical markers of autophagy., Dr Toren Finkel’s group generated a reporter mouse expressing the fluorescent reporter Mito-Keima, which results from the fusion of the fluorescent protein Keima to the mitochondrial matrix protein COX8 (Figure ). Keima is a pH-sensitive fluorescent protein whose emission spectra differ in mitochondria (458 nm, green fluorescence at pH 8.0) compared to the acidic environment of lysosomes (561 nm, red fluorescence at pH 4.5). Transgenic mitochondria-localized Keima mice have been used to assess mitophagy since this model provides the most sensitive and specific analysis of mitochondrial flux to lysosomes (Figure ). However, there are downsides to assessing mitophagy using the Mito-Keima probe. For instance, the Keima excitation wavelengths for green and red fluorescence partially overlap, rendering the quantitation and interpretation of the data difficult. It should also be noted that Mito-Keima fluorescence fades upon prolonged light exposure. In addition, fixation disrupts the lysosomal pH gradient required for this probe to work. To optimize these conditions, it is important to increase the cross-link reaction while suppressing tissue damage. Augmenting the concentration of formaldehyde is not an option since its amount is usually in excess. Higher temperatures promote autolysis of the tissue. A longer reaction time may result in an inappropriate diffusion of denatured protein. Thus, pH may be the sole parameter that can be adjusted to achieve this purpose. Since the affinity of formaldehyde for an unprotonated amino group is much higher than for a protonated group, the formation of the aminomethylol group is highly pH sensitive. As the pH increases, more groups lose their proton and react with formaldehyde. In fact, the advantage of alkaline fixation for effective cross-linking has been reported in the context of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization., Moreover, alkaline fixation counter-neutralizes the intracellular pH, thus preventing inappropriate acidic Mito-Keima signals due to cell death-dependent intracellular acidification. To observe mitophagy using Mito-Keima mice, heart is fixed with alkaline formaldehyde for 30 min. Vibratome-mediated sectioning and microscopic analysis are conducted immediately after fixation. The high-ratio signal (561/458 nm), indicating localization of Mito-Keima protein in an acidic environment, is upregulated in response to starvation or ischaemia in the wild-type heart and associated with the induction of autophagy (Figure , unpublished data). Treatment with Tat-Beclin1, an autophagy-inducing peptide, also increased this signal. On the other hand, the hearts from cardiac-specific Atg7 knockout mice do not show any high-ratio signal at baseline. This suggests that the high-ratio signal of Mito-Keima obtained with alkaline fixation clearly reflects mitophagy. One cautionary note with the use of Mito-Keima mice is that it is difficult to exclude the possibility that ischaemia may contribute to the formation of acidic puncta. It is recommended to complete the procedure within 2 h. Mito-Keima as a mitophagy reporter to study cardiac mitophagy in mice. (Upper panel) Isolated adult mouse cardiomyocytes from 16-week-old male Mito-Keima mice with no treatment (basal) or 24 h starvation. (Lower panel) Mouse heart tissue from Mito-Keima mice with no treatment (basal) or after 48 h of starvation. Images were taken with a confocal microscope with sequential 458 nm and 561 nm excitations. Normal mitochondria are presented as green and mitophagy (mitochondria fused with lysosome) is presented as red. Scale bar: 25 µm. Since the rate of mitochondrial turnover is slow in the heart (approximately every 2 weeks),, measuring mitochondrial turnover and biosynthesis in vivo has proven difficult. Consequently, several novel methods have been developed to monitor mitophagy in vivo, including the use of fluorescent probes such as MitoTimer and Mito-QC (quality control). MitoTimer is a useful tool for monitoring mitochondrial turnover in vivo. The fluorescent timer protein, also called DsRed-E5, is a mutant form of the red fluorescent protein DsRed that changes its colour from green to red over a period of time as the protein matures. The timer protein was fused with mitochondria targeting sequence of COX8A to generate MitoTimer targeted to the mitochondrial matrix., Subsequently, Stotland and Gottlieb generated transgenic mice with cardiac-specific expression of MitoTimer driven by the cardiac α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) promoter. Despite the fact that α-MHC is equally expressed in atrial and ventricular myocardium, MitoTimer is largely expressed in the left and right ventricles and to the lesser extent in the atria. MitoTimer expression in vivo facilitates its use in experiments exploring roles of mitophagy in skeletal and cardiac muscle. The Mito-QC probe is another new tool developed for assessing mitophagy and visualizing the mitochondrial network. Like Mito-Keima, Mito-QC is a pH-sensitive mitochondrial fluorescent probe, consisting in the tandem mCherry-GFP tag fused to the OMM protein FIS1. Mito-QC shows green and red fluorescence in normal conditions but reveals a predominant mCherry (red) signal when mitophagy is induced and mitochondria are delivered to the lysosomes. McWilliams et al. generated the Mito-QC transgenic mice, which can be used to monitor changes in mitophagy during stress. Unlike for the Mito-Keima reporter, there is no evidence of an overlap in the Mito-QC excitation spectra. Furthermore, it has been reported that samples from Mito-QC mouse can be fixed prior to microscopic analysis. However, Mito-QC also requires the pH gradient across the lysosomal membrane for an accurate detection of mitophagy. Since acid-induced reduction of GFP fluorescence is reversible upon re-neutralization of pH,, the acidic signal of Mito-QC (red alone) should theoretically only be maintained in the presence of the pH gradient across the lysosomal membrane. We therefore speculate that optimized fixation aimed at preserving lysosomal membrane structure is essential not only for Mito-Keima but also for Mito-QC. Despite technical limitations, these tools present significant advantages that allow the assessment of mitophagy in vivo. However, extensive research is necessary for the development of the state-of-the-art techniques to better understand the regulation of mitophagy in CD.

4.3 Chaperone-mediated autophagy

Assessing the CMA status in different tissues from various rodent models can be performed via the assays mentioned earlier. For example, CMA has been investigated using lysosomes isolated from liver, brain, kidney, and spleen. The lamp-2 gene gives rise to three splice variants, lamp-2a, b, and c. The resulting proteins, LAMP-2A, B, and C, have been associated with CMA, macroautophagy, and RNAphagy respectively. A previous model with deletion of the whole LAMP-2 gene that targets all three isoforms of LAMP2 proved unsuitable for investigating CMA due to interference with other autophagic pathways and defective lysosomal biogenesis and stability. A Cre-loxP system was used to disrupt an exon specific to domains of LAMP-2A without affecting the other two LAMP-2 isoforms. This first in vivo approach demonstrated the importance of CMA in the regulation of metabolism, since mice lacking LAMP-2A in the liver displayed severe dysfunction in glucose and lipid metabolism. Implication of CMA in the immune system was shown by Valdor et al. This study showed that CMA is required for proper T-cell activation and that restoration of LAMP-2A in aged cells results in an improved T-cell response.

4.4 Autosis

As a unique biochemical feature, autosis is regulated by the Na+, K+-ATPase. Cardiac glycosides like digoxin, a chemical inhibitor of the Na+, K+-ATPase, block autosis and markedly reduce brain injury in response to cerebral hypoxiaischaemia in neonatal rats. Of note, unlike the human α-isoforms of the Na+, K+-ATPase, the mouse α1 isoform of the Na+, K+-ATPase is insensitive to cardiac glycosides. Since the expression level of α1 isoform is predominant over the other α-isoforms, the Na+, K+-ATPase cannot be inhibited by digoxin-like molecules in the rodent heart. This limitation can be avoided using cardiac-glycoside sensitive Na+, K+-ATPase α1 knock-in mice. Replacement of specific amino acid residues in the mouse Na+, K+-ATPase α1 (Arg-111 and Asp-122) with residues naturally present in the human α1 isoform (to Glu-111 and Asn-122) confers sensitivity to cardiac glycosides. It should be noted that these compounds are used for the treatment of systolic heart failure and for heart rate control in the presence of atrial fibrillation. These effects are mediated by an increase of intracellular calcium concentration in cardiomyocytes. It is reasonable to speculate that some of the beneficial effects of digitalis on cardiac contractility may be partially mediated by the reduction of autosis.

5. Conclusions and perspectives

The literature reviewed here strongly indicates that modulation of autophagy represents a potential therapeutic approach to treat CD upon various stress conditions. Several therapeutic strategies have been proposed to stimulate autophagy. Inhibitors of mTORC1, such as rapalogues (rapamycin analogues), or activators of AMPK, such as metformin and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR), confer cardioprotection in different stress conditions, including aging.,, Natural compounds can also be considered valid options because of their lower toxicity. For example, resveratrol, a polyphenol present in red wine, stimulates cardiac autophagy through activation of NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) and AMPK., Spermidine and trehalose are inducers of autophagy and may be considered novel cardioprotective agents as well., Synthetic peptides that have the ability to selectively activate autophagy were recently developed and showed to benefit cardiac function. For instance, administration of a low dose of Tat-Beclin 1 counteracted heart failure induced by pressure overload via induction of mitophagy. Recently, it has been shown that aspirin, a worldwide drug used to prevent heart attack in high risk patients, induces autophagy, suggesting a novel molecular mechanism underlying the pro-health effects of this drug. However, most of the molecules that induce autophagy, often, also impact other molecular pathways and this problem limits their use. Certainly, the development of more specific autophagy inducers is a major issue for forthcoming researches. In particular, natural activators of autophagy may represent a valid option for activating autophagy in patients because of their low adverse effects. Another point that needs to be considered is the study of the impact of standard pharmacological agents for the treatment of CD on autophagy. In the future, it will be interesting to evaluate the cardioprotective role of CMA and lipophagy stimulation for the treatment of cardiac and metabolic diseases, also in response to triggers relevant to CD, such as oxidative stress, hypoxia, and lipogenic challenges, or its age-associated decline. Although in most conditions autophagy activation reduces myocardial injury, in certain pathological situations it appears to be maladaptive in the heart. Further investigations are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying this paradoxical consequence. Although it is possible that exaggerated autophagy activation is deleterious, it may also be possible that the signalling mechanisms promoting autophagy may determine whether the outcome is beneficial or toxic. It is now known that alternative pathways regulating autophagy exist and recent work has demonstrated that specific molecules regulating the autophagic machinery could also trigger other forms of cell death. Clarifying these aspects is key to understanding when autophagy needs to be activated and when this activation should be avoided. In this regard, the use of cardiac-specific conditional knockout models for autophagy may prove beneficial. Finally, methods to study autophagy require further improvements. Since autophagy is a dynamic process, misinterpretation of data leads to inaccurate evaluation of autophagy and autophagic flux. In addition, several results from previous studies were obtained in in vitro models, which are important for dissecting the signalling pathways regulating autophagy but may not be able to mimic the in vivo environment and may have limited physiological relevance. To date, several detection tools have been developed to precisely quantify autophagy in diverse model systems, and these methodologies were recently summarized and standardized in guidelines for the evaluation of mammalian autophagy. The evaluation of autophagy in human subjects remains yet another important challenge. It would be critical to understand how levels of cardiac autophagy correlate with cardiac outcomes in subjects affected by CD. This is possible when myocardial biopsies are available. Unfortunately, this approach is not always feasible, particularly in larger cohorts of subjects. Therefore, it is important to develop new techniques to monitor autophagy in vivo or to identify novel circulating markers associated with cardiac autophagy and dysfunction, which may be used to monitor autophagy in human subjects.

Author contributions

M.C.M., A.F., and S.S., conceived the manuscript idea and together with J.M.M. and N.K. coordinated and supervised the work. All the authors participated in manuscript writing, critically reviewed the content and agree to be accountable for the work. S.K. performed major scientific editing. A.F., M.C.M., F.C., J.N., J.M.M., N.K., S.K., and Y.C. prepared figures and tables.
Table 1

Methods for the assay of different forms of autophagy

Form of autophagy assayedMethodSensor/markerFeatures observedLimitations
Non-selective general autophagyElectron microscopy

Double-membrane structures (autophagosomes);

Single-membrane, electron dense vacuoles (autolysosomes)

Subject to artefacts, large number of replicates required
Fluorescence microscopyGFP-LC3GFP-LC3 puncta indicative of autophagosome levelsAggregates formation, GFP fluorescence quenched at low pH (no information on autophagy flux)
mRFP-GFP-LC3Green and red fluorescent puncta indicate autophagosomes, red-only puncta indicate autolysosomes
GFP-LC3-RFP-LC3ΔGGFP/RFP ratio indicates autophagic fluxPoor time resolution
DAPGreen/DALGreenEnhanced fluorescence under lipophilic (DAPGreen) or acidic (DALGreen) conditions
Western BlotLC3-IILC3-II levels and turnover directly correlate with the autophagic flux/activityAssess in the presence and absence of lysosomal inhibitors
p62p62 levels inversely correlate with the autophagic flux/activityp62 levels are also transcriptionally regulated; p62 can be degraded by the proteasome
MitophagyElectron microscopyIndividual mitochondria engulfed by autophagosomes or autolysosomesNon-quantitative due to limited number of sections, large sample variability
Fluorescence microscopyMito-KeimaRatio between green (mitochondria) and red fluorescence (lysosomes)Fixation disrupts the lysosomal pH, excitation spectra partially overlap
Mito-TimerShift from green to red fluorescence over time
Mito-QCPredominant red fluorescence upon mitophagy induction
Co-labeling for GFP-LC3 or lysosomes and mitochondrial proteinsColocalization of mitochondria with autophagosomes and/or lysosomesMitochondrial degradation confirmed upon addition of lysosomal inhibitors, GFP-LC3 aggregation
Assessment of mitochondrial mass by western blot and real time PCRLevels of mitochondrial proteins, mitochondrial-to-nuclear DNA ratioAltered levels of mitochondrial proteins and mtDNASome mitochondrial proteins are degraded through proteasome or CMA; mtDNA levels may change due to alterations in mitochondrial biogenesis
Chaperone-mediated autophagyFluorescence microscopyKFERQ-Dendra2Fluorescent puncta indicative of CMA activityIndicates only the binding step in the CMA pathway
Co-staining for HSC70 and LAMP-2AIndicates the number of CMA active lysosomes
Western blotLAMP-2ALysosomal LAMP-2A levels are proportional to CMA activityCMA activation may occur without de novo synthesis of LAMP-2A
Lysosomal uptake of CMA substratesThe amount of translocated substrate is proportional to CMA activity
Metabolic labelingRadio-labelled proteinsAccumulation of radio-labelled proteins with inhibitors of lysosomal proteases or macroautophagyCMA and microautophagy cannot be differentiated
AutosisElectron microscopyIntense vacuolization, swelling of the perinuclear space, nuclear concavityNuclear concavity may also appear in other cell types (i.e. endothelial cells)
Fluorescence microscopyNuclear stainingNuclear concavityNuclear concavity may also appear in other cell types (i.e. endothelial cells)
Fluorescence microscopyER proteins immunostainingER fragmentationNot a definitive marker of autosis
Table 2

Genetic mouse models employed for the study of different macroautophagy forms in the cardiac system

Mouse lineEffect on autophagy/mitophagyCardiac disease modelEffect on cardiac functionReferences
Atg5−/− InhibitedPressure overloadExacerbated hypertrophy, LV dilation and dysfunction 51
Atg5 Tg overexpressionIncreasedAgingReduced age-related cardiac fibrosis, lifespan extension 23
Beclin 1+/− AttenuatedI/R injury, pressure overload, diabetic cardiomyopathy, sepsisCardioprotective during reperfusion, blunted LV remodelling 21 , 26 , 87 , 130 , 131
Beclin 1 Tg overexpressionIncreasedPressure overload; Diabetic cardiomyopathyExacerbated LV remodelling 21 , 87
IncreasedSepsisCardioprotective 130
Beclin 1 F121A knock-inIncreasedAgingReduced age-associated cardiac alterations, increased lifespan 52
ATG16L1-HMMacroautophagy inhibited, mitophagy restoredDiabetic cardiomyopathyAttenuated cardiac derangements 87
Mst1−/− IncreasedMyocardial infarctionReduced infarct size, cardioprotective 69
RHEB overexpressionInhibitedIschaemiaExacerbated injury 27
AMPK dominant-negative Tg overexpressionInhibitedIschaemiaExacerbated injury 26
Parkin Tg overexpressionIncreasedAgingReduction in age-associated cardiac abnormalities 25
Parkin−/− ReducedMyocardial infarctionIncreased infarct size, hypertrophy 74
DRP1−/− InhibitedI/R injury, pressure overloadExacerbated injury, heart failure 32 , 73
PGAM5−/− InhibitedI/R injuryExacerbated injury 66
  163 in total

1.  Autophagy limits acute myocardial infarction induced by permanent coronary artery occlusion.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Kanamori; Genzou Takemura; Kazuko Goto; Rumi Maruyama; Koh Ono; Kazuya Nagao; Akiko Tsujimoto; Atsushi Ogino; Toshiaki Takeyama; Tomonori Kawaguchi; Takatomo Watanabe; Masanori Kawasaki; Takako Fujiwara; Hisayoshi Fujiwara; Mitsuru Seishima; Shinya Minatoguchi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Impaired autophagosome clearance contributes to cardiomyocyte death in ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Xiucui Ma; Haiyan Liu; Sarah R Foyil; Rebecca J Godar; Carla J Weinheimer; Joseph A Hill; Abhinav Diwan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Assessment of GFP fluorescence in cells of Streptococcus gordonii under conditions of low pH and low oxygen concentration.

Authors:  Martin C Hansen; Robert J Palmer; Camilla Udsen; David C White; Søren Molin
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 4.  Lipophagy in nonliver tissues and some related diseases: Pathogenic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Kebing Zhou; Pingbo Yao; Jun He; Hong Zhao
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 5.  Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy.

Authors:  Congcong He; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Cardiac autophagy is a maladaptive response to hemodynamic stress.

Authors:  Hongxin Zhu; Paul Tannous; Janet L Johnstone; Yongli Kong; John M Shelton; James A Richardson; Vien Le; Beth Levine; Beverly A Rothermel; Joseph A Hill
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  LC3, GABARAP and GATE16 localize to autophagosomal membrane depending on form-II formation.

Authors:  Yukiko Kabeya; Noboru Mizushima; Akitsugu Yamamoto; Satsuki Oshitani-Okamoto; Yoshinori Ohsumi; Tamotsu Yoshimori
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Spermidine and resveratrol induce autophagy by distinct pathways converging on the acetylproteome.

Authors:  Eugenia Morselli; Guillermo Mariño; Martin V Bennetzen; Tobias Eisenberg; Evgenia Megalou; Sabrina Schroeder; Sandra Cabrera; Paule Bénit; Pierre Rustin; Alfredo Criollo; Oliver Kepp; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Shensi Shen; Shoaib Ahmad Malik; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Yoshiyuki Horio; Carlos López-Otín; Jens S Andersen; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Frank Madeo; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Small fluorescent molecules for monitoring autophagic flux.

Authors:  Hidefumi Iwashita; Hajime Tajima Sakurai; Noriyoshi Nagahora; Munetaka Ishiyama; Kosei Shioji; Kazumi Sasamoto; Kentaro Okuma; Shigeomi Shimizu; Yuichiro Ueno
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Dissecting the association of autophagy-related genes with cardiovascular diseases and intermediate vascular traits: A population-based approach.

Authors:  Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Mohsen Ghanbari; Joyce B J van Meurs; A H Jan Danser; Oscar H Franco; Taulant Muka; Anton Roks; Abbas Dehghan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Selective Autophagy in Hyperglycemia-Induced Microvascular and Macrovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Leena P Bharath; Jack Donato Rockhold; Rachel Conway
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 2.  Autophagy in major human diseases.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Giulia Petroni; Ravi K Amaravadi; Eric H Baehrecke; Andrea Ballabio; Patricia Boya; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Ken Cadwell; Francesco Cecconi; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Charleen T Chu; Patrice Codogno; Maria Isabel Colombo; Ana Maria Cuervo; Vojo Deretic; Ivan Dikic; Zvulun Elazar; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Gian Maria Fimia; David A Gewirtz; Douglas R Green; Malene Hansen; Marja Jäättelä; Terje Johansen; Gábor Juhász; Vassiliki Karantza; Claudine Kraft; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Sharad Kumar; Carlos Lopez-Otin; Kay F Macleod; Frank Madeo; Jennifer Martinez; Alicia Meléndez; Noboru Mizushima; Christian Münz; Josef M Penninger; Rushika M Perera; Mauro Piacentini; Fulvio Reggiori; David C Rubinsztein; Kevin M Ryan; Junichi Sadoshima; Laura Santambrogio; Luca Scorrano; Hans-Uwe Simon; Anna Katharina Simon; Anne Simonsen; Alexandra Stolz; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Sharon A Tooze; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Junying Yuan; Zhenyu Yue; Qing Zhong; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Federico Pietrocola
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 14.012

Review 3.  Moments in autophagy and disease: Past and present.

Authors:  Xin Wen; Ying Yang; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of multiple forms of mitophagy in the heart.

Authors:  Toshiro Saito; Kimikazu Hamano; Junichi Sadoshima
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

Authors:  Daniel J Klionsky; Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz; Sara Abdelfatah; Mahmoud Abdellatif; Asghar Abdoli; Steffen Abel; Hagai Abeliovich; Marie H Abildgaard; Yakubu Princely Abudu; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Khosrow Adeli; Timon E Adolph; Annagrazia Adornetto; Elma Aflaki; Galila Agam; Anupam Agarwal; Bharat B Aggarwal; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Javed N Agrewala; Alexander Agrotis; Patricia V Aguilar; S Tariq Ahmad; Zubair M Ahmed; Ulises Ahumada-Castro; Sonja Aits; Shu Aizawa; Yunus Akkoc; Tonia Akoumianaki; Hafize Aysin Akpinar; Ahmed M Al-Abd; Lina Al-Akra; Abeer Al-Gharaibeh; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Simon Alberti; Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez; Cristiano Alessandri; Muhammad Ali; M Abdul Alim Al-Bari; Saeb Aliwaini; Javad Alizadeh; Eugènia Almacellas; Alexandru Almasan; Alicia Alonso; Guillermo D Alonso; Nihal Altan-Bonnet; Dario C Altieri; Élida M C Álvarez; Sara Alves; Cristine Alves da Costa; Mazen M Alzaharna; Marialaura Amadio; Consuelo Amantini; Cristina Amaral; Susanna Ambrosio; Amal O Amer; Veena Ammanathan; Zhenyi An; Stig U Andersen; Shaida A Andrabi; Magaiver Andrade-Silva; Allen M Andres; Sabrina Angelini; David Ann; Uche C Anozie; Mohammad Y Ansari; Pedro Antas; Adam Antebi; Zuriñe Antón; Tahira Anwar; Lionel Apetoh; Nadezda Apostolova; Toshiyuki Araki; Yasuhiro Araki; Kohei Arasaki; Wagner L Araújo; Jun Araya; Catherine Arden; Maria-Angeles Arévalo; Sandro Arguelles; Esperanza Arias; Jyothi Arikkath; Hirokazu Arimoto; Aileen R Ariosa; Darius Armstrong-James; Laetitia Arnauné-Pelloquin; Angeles Aroca; Daniela S Arroyo; Ivica Arsov; Rubén Artero; Dalia Maria Lucia Asaro; Michael Aschner; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Atanas G Atanasov; Alicia K Au; Patrick Auberger; Holger W Auner; Laure Aurelian; Riccardo Autelli; Laura Avagliano; Yenniffer Ávalos; Sanja Aveic; Célia Alexandra Aveleira; Tamar Avin-Wittenberg; Yucel Aydin; Scott Ayton; Srinivas Ayyadevara; Maria Azzopardi; Misuzu Baba; Jonathan M Backer; Steven K Backues; Dong-Hun Bae; Ok-Nam Bae; Soo Han Bae; Eric H Baehrecke; Ahruem Baek; Seung-Hoon Baek; Sung Hee Baek; Giacinto Bagetta; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Hua Bai; Jie Bai; Xiyuan Bai; Yidong Bai; Nandadulal Bairagi; Shounak Baksi; Teresa Balbi; Cosima T Baldari; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Maria Ballester; Salma Balazadeh; Rena Balzan; Rina Bandopadhyay; Sreeparna Banerjee; Sulagna Banerjee; Ágnes Bánréti; Yan Bao; Mauricio S Baptista; Alessandra Baracca; Cristiana Barbati; Ariadna Bargiela; Daniela Barilà; Peter G Barlow; Sami J Barmada; Esther Barreiro; George E Barreto; Jiri Bartek; Bonnie Bartel; Alberto Bartolome; Gaurav R Barve; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Alakananda Basu; Henri Batoko; Isabella Batten; Etienne E Baulieu; Bradley L Baumgarner; Jagadeesh Bayry; Rupert Beale; Isabelle Beau; Florian Beaumatin; Luiz R G Bechara; George R Beck; Michael F Beers; Jakob Begun; Christian Behrends; Georg M N Behrens; Roberto Bei; Eloy Bejarano; Shai Bel; Christian Behl; Amine Belaid; Naïma Belgareh-Touzé; Cristina Bellarosa; Francesca Belleudi; Melissa Belló Pérez; Raquel Bello-Morales; Jackeline Soares de Oliveira Beltran; Sebastián Beltran; Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook; Mykolas Bendorius; Bruno A Benitez; Irene Benito-Cuesta; Julien Bensalem; Martin W Berchtold; Sabina Berezowska; Daniele Bergamaschi; Matteo Bergami; Andreas Bergmann; Laura Berliocchi; Clarisse Berlioz-Torrent; Amélie Bernard; Lionel Berthoux; Cagri G Besirli; Sebastien Besteiro; Virginie M Betin; Rudi Beyaert; Jelena S Bezbradica; Kiran Bhaskar; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Resham Bhattacharya; Sujoy Bhattacharya; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Md Shenuarin Bhuiyan; Sujit Kumar Bhutia; Lanrong Bi; Xiaolin Bi; Trevor J Biden; Krikor Bijian; Viktor A Billes; Nadine Binart; Claudia Bincoletto; Asa B Birgisdottir; Geir Bjorkoy; Gonzalo Blanco; Ana Blas-Garcia; Janusz Blasiak; Robert Blomgran; Klas Blomgren; Janice S Blum; Emilio Boada-Romero; Mirta Boban; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Philippe Boeuf; Barry Boland; Pascale Bomont; Paolo Bonaldo; Srinivasa Reddy Bonam; Laura Bonfili; Juan S Bonifacino; Brian A Boone; Martin D Bootman; Matteo Bordi; Christoph Borner; Beat C Bornhauser; Gautam Borthakur; Jürgen Bosch; Santanu Bose; Luis M Botana; Juan Botas; Chantal M Boulanger; Michael E Boulton; Mathieu Bourdenx; Benjamin Bourgeois; Nollaig M Bourke; Guilhem Bousquet; Patricia Boya; Peter V Bozhkov; Luiz H M Bozi; Tolga O Bozkurt; Doug E Brackney; Christian H Brandts; Ralf J Braun; Gerhard H Braus; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; José M Bravo-San Pedro; Patrick Brest; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Alfredo Briones-Herrera; V Courtney Broaddus; Peter Brodersen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Steven L Brody; Paola G Bronson; Jeff M Bronstein; Carolyn N Brown; Rhoderick E Brown; Patricia C Brum; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Daniele Bruno; Robert J Bryson-Richardson; Cecilia Bucci; Carmen Buchrieser; Marta Bueno; Laura Elisa Buitrago-Molina; Simone Buraschi; Shilpa Buch; J Ross Buchan; Erin M Buckingham; Hikmet Budak; Mauricio Budini; Geert Bultynck; Florin Burada; Joseph R Burgoyne; M Isabel Burón; Victor Bustos; Sabrina Büttner; Elena Butturini; Aaron Byrd; Isabel Cabas; Sandra Cabrera-Benitez; Ken Cadwell; Jingjing Cai; Lu Cai; Qian Cai; Montserrat Cairó; Jose A Calbet; Guy A Caldwell; Kim A Caldwell; Jarrod A Call; Riccardo Calvani; Ana C Calvo; Miguel Calvo-Rubio Barrera; Niels Os Camara; Jacques H Camonis; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Edward M Campbell; François-Xavier Campbell-Valois; Silvia Campello; Ilaria Campesi; Juliane C Campos; Olivier Camuzard; Jorge Cancino; Danilo Candido de Almeida; Laura Canesi; Isabella Caniggia; Barbara Canonico; Carles Cantí; Bin Cao; Michele Caraglia; Beatriz Caramés; Evie H Carchman; Elena Cardenal-Muñoz; Cesar Cardenas; Luis Cardenas; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Georges F Carle; Gillian Carleton; Silvia Carloni; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Leticia A Carneiro; Oliana Carnevali; Julian M Carosi; Serena Carra; Alice Carrier; Lucie Carrier; Bernadette Carroll; A Brent Carter; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Magali Casanova; Caty Casas; Josefina Casas; Chiara Cassioli; Eliseo F Castillo; Karen Castillo; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francesca Castoldi; Marco Castori; Ariel F Castro; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Javier Castro-Hernandez; Susana Castro-Obregon; Sergio D Catz; Claudia Cavadas; Federica Cavaliere; Gabriella Cavallini; Maria Cavinato; Maria L Cayuela; Paula Cebollada Rica; Valentina Cecarini; Francesco Cecconi; Marzanna Cechowska-Pasko; Simone Cenci; Victòria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; João J Cerqueira; Janete M Cerutti; Davide Cervia; Vildan Bozok Cetintas; Silvia Cetrullo; Han-Jung Chae; Andrei S Chagin; Chee-Yin Chai; Gopal Chakrabarti; Oishee Chakrabarti; Tapas Chakraborty; Trinad Chakraborty; Mounia Chami; Georgios Chamilos; David W Chan; Edmond Y W Chan; Edward D Chan; H Y Edwin Chan; Helen H Chan; Hung Chan; Matthew T V Chan; Yau Sang Chan; Partha K Chandra; Chih-Peng Chang; Chunmei Chang; Hao-Chun Chang; Kai Chang; Jie Chao; Tracey Chapman; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Samrat Chatterjee; Shail K Chaube; Anu Chaudhary; Santosh Chauhan; Edward Chaum; Frédéric Checler; Michael E Cheetham; Chang-Shi Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Jian-Fu Chen; Liam L Chen; Leilei Chen; Lin Chen; Mingliang Chen; Mu-Kuan Chen; Ning Chen; Quan Chen; Ruey-Hwa Chen; Shi Chen; Wei Chen; Weiqiang Chen; Xin-Ming Chen; Xiong-Wen Chen; Xu Chen; Yan Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Yue-Qin Chen; Zhefan Stephen Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhi-Hua Chen; Zhijian J Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Hanhua Cheng; Jun Cheng; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Wei Cheng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xiu-Tang Cheng; Yiyun Cheng; Zhiyong Cheng; Zhong Chen; Heesun Cheong; Jit Kong Cheong; Boris V Chernyak; Sara Cherry; Chi Fai Randy Cheung; Chun Hei Antonio Cheung; King-Ho Cheung; Eric Chevet; Richard J Chi; Alan Kwok Shing Chiang; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Roberto Chiarelli; Mario Chiariello; Nathalia Chica; Susanna Chiocca; Mario Chiong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Abhilash I Chiramel; Valerio Chiurchiù; Dong-Hyung Cho; Seong-Kyu Choe; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Kamalika Roy Choudhury; Norman S Chow; Charleen T Chu; Jason P Chua; John Jia En Chua; Hyewon Chung; Kin Pan Chung; Seockhoon Chung; So-Hyang Chung; Yuen-Li Chung; Valentina Cianfanelli; Iwona A Ciechomska; Mariana Cifuentes; Laura Cinque; Sebahattin Cirak; Mara Cirone; Michael J Clague; Robert Clarke; Emilio Clementi; Eliana M Coccia; Patrice Codogno; Ehud Cohen; Mickael M Cohen; Tania Colasanti; Fiorella Colasuonno; Robert A Colbert; Anna Colell; Miodrag Čolić; Nuria S Coll; Mark O Collins; María I Colombo; Daniel A Colón-Ramos; Lydie Combaret; Sergio Comincini; Márcia R Cominetti; Antonella Consiglio; Andrea Conte; Fabrizio Conti; Viorica Raluca Contu; Mark R Cookson; Kevin M Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Dale P Corkery; Nils Cordes; Katia Cortese; Maria do Carmo Costa; Sarah Costantino; Paola Costelli; Ana Coto-Montes; Peter J Crack; Jose L Crespo; Alfredo Criollo; Valeria Crippa; Riccardo Cristofani; Tamas Csizmadia; Antonio Cuadrado; Bing Cui; Jun Cui; Yixian Cui; Yong Cui; Emmanuel Culetto; Andrea C Cumino; Andrey V Cybulsky; Mark J Czaja; Stanislaw J Czuczwar; Stefania D'Adamo; Marcello D'Amelio; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Andrew C D'Lugos; Gabriella D'Orazi; James A da Silva; Hormos Salimi Dafsari; Ruben K Dagda; Yasin Dagdas; Maria Daglia; Xiaoxia Dai; Yun Dai; Yuyuan Dai; Jessica Dal Col; Paul Dalhaimer; Luisa Dalla Valle; Tobias Dallenga; Guillaume Dalmasso; Markus Damme; Ilaria Dando; Nico P Dantuma; April L Darling; Hiranmoy Das; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Santosh K Dasari; Srikanta Dash; Oliver Daumke; Adrian N Dauphinee; Jeffrey S Davies; Valeria A Dávila; Roger J Davis; Tanja Davis; Sharadha Dayalan Naidu; Francesca De Amicis; Karolien De Bosscher; Francesca De Felice; Lucia De Franceschi; Chiara De Leonibus; Mayara G de Mattos Barbosa; Guido R Y De Meyer; Angelo De Milito; Cosimo De Nunzio; Clara De Palma; Mauro De Santi; Claudio De Virgilio; Daniela De Zio; Jayanta Debnath; Brian J DeBosch; Jean-Paul Decuypere; Mark A Deehan; Gianluca Deflorian; James DeGregori; Benjamin Dehay; Gabriel Del Rio; Joe R Delaney; Lea M D Delbridge; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; M Victoria Delpino; Francesca Demarchi; Vilma Dembitz; Nicholas D Demers; Hongbin Deng; Zhiqiang Deng; Joern Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Melvin L DePamphilis; Channing J Der; Vojo Deretic; Albert Descoteaux; Laura Devis; Sushil Devkota; Olivier Devuyst; Grant Dewson; Mahendiran Dharmasivam; Rohan Dhiman; Diego di Bernardo; Manlio Di Cristina; Fabio Di Domenico; Pietro Di Fazio; Alessio Di Fonzo; Giovanni Di Guardo; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Luca Di Leo; Chiara Di Malta; Alessia Di Nardo; Martina Di Rienzo; Federica Di Sano; George Diallinas; Jiajie Diao; Guillermo Diaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Jared M Dickinson; Marc Diederich; Mélanie Dieudé; Ivan Dikic; Shiping Ding; Wen-Xing Ding; Luciana Dini; Jelena Dinić; Miroslav Dinic; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Marc S Dionne; Jörg H W Distler; Abhinav Diwan; Ian M C Dixon; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Ina Dobrinski; Oxana Dobrovinskaya; Radek Dobrowolski; Renwick C J Dobson; Jelena Đokić; Serap Dokmeci Emre; Massimo Donadelli; Bo Dong; Xiaonan Dong; Zhiwu Dong; Gerald W Dorn Ii; Volker Dotsch; Huan Dou; Juan Dou; Moataz Dowaidar; Sami Dridi; Liat Drucker; Ailian Du; Caigan Du; Guangwei Du; Hai-Ning Du; Li-Lin Du; André du Toit; Shao-Bin Duan; Xiaoqiong Duan; Sónia P Duarte; Anna Dubrovska; Elaine A Dunlop; Nicolas Dupont; Raúl V Durán; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sergey A Dyshlovoy; Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari; Leopold Eckhart; Charles L Edelstein; Thomas Efferth; Eftekhar Eftekharpour; Ludwig Eichinger; Nabil Eid; Tobias Eisenberg; N Tony Eissa; Sanaa Eissa; Miriam Ejarque; Abdeljabar El Andaloussi; Nazira El-Hage; Shahenda El-Naggar; Anna Maria Eleuteri; Eman S El-Shafey; Mohamed Elgendy; Aristides G Eliopoulos; María M Elizalde; Philip M Elks; Hans-Peter Elsasser; Eslam S Elsherbiny; Brooke M Emerling; N C Tolga Emre; Christina H Eng; Nikolai Engedal; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Agnete S T Engelsen; Jorrit M Enserink; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Mafalda Escobar-Henriques; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Makandjou-Ola Eusebio; Gemma Fabrias; Cinzia Fabrizi; Antonio Facchiano; Francesco Facchiano; Bengt Fadeel; Claudio Fader; Alex C Faesen; W Douglas Fairlie; Alberto Falcó; Bjorn H Falkenburger; Daping Fan; Jie Fan; Yanbo Fan; Evandro F Fang; Yanshan Fang; Yognqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Tamar Farfel-Becker; Mathias Faure; Gholamreza Fazeli; Anthony O Fedele; Arthur M Feldman; Du Feng; Jiachun Feng; Lifeng Feng; Yibin Feng; Yuchen Feng; Wei Feng; Thais Fenz Araujo; Thomas A Ferguson; Álvaro F Fernández; Jose C Fernandez-Checa; Sonia Fernández-Veledo; Alisdair R Fernie; Anthony W Ferrante; Alessandra Ferraresi; Merari F Ferrari; Julio C B Ferreira; Susan Ferro-Novick; Antonio Figueras; Riccardo Filadi; Nicoletta Filigheddu; Eduardo Filippi-Chiela; Giuseppe Filomeni; Gian Maria Fimia; Vittorio Fineschi; Francesca Finetti; Steven Finkbeiner; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Flavio Flamigni; Steven J Fliesler; Trude H Flo; Ida Florance; Oliver Florey; Tullio Florio; Erika Fodor; Carlo Follo; Edward A Fon; Antonella Forlino; Francesco Fornai; Paola Fortini; Anna Fracassi; Alessandro Fraldi; Brunella Franco; Rodrigo Franco; Flavia Franconi; Lisa B Frankel; Scott L Friedman; Leopold F Fröhlich; Gema Frühbeck; Jose M Fuentes; Yukio Fujiki; Naonobu Fujita; Yuuki Fujiwara; Mitsunori Fukuda; Simone Fulda; Luc Furic; Norihiko Furuya; Carmela Fusco; Michaela U Gack; Lidia Gaffke; Sehamuddin Galadari; Alessia Galasso; Maria F Galindo; Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Vincent Galy; Noor Gammoh; Boyi Gan; Ian G Ganley; Feng Gao; Hui Gao; Minghui Gao; Ping Gao; Shou-Jiang Gao; Wentao Gao; Xiaobo Gao; Ana Garcera; Maria Noé Garcia; Verónica E Garcia; Francisco García-Del Portillo; Vega Garcia-Escudero; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Marina Garcia-Macia; Diana García-Moreno; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; Patricia García-Sanz; Abhishek D Garg; Ricardo Gargini; Tina Garofalo; Robert F Garry; Nils C Gassen; Damian Gatica; Liang Ge; Wanzhong Ge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Cecilia Gelfi; Pascal Genschik; Ian E Gentle; Valeria Gerbino; Christoph Gerhardt; Kyla Germain; Marc Germain; David A Gewirtz; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Saeid Ghavami; Alessandra Ghigo; Manosij Ghosh; Georgios Giamas; Claudia Giampietri; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Gary E Gibson; Spencer B Gibson; Vanessa Ginet; Edward Giniger; Carlotta Giorgi; Henrique Girao; Stephen E Girardin; Mridhula Giridharan; Sandy Giuliano; Cecilia Giulivi; Sylvie Giuriato; Julien Giustiniani; Alexander Gluschko; Veit Goder; Alexander Goginashvili; Jakub Golab; David C Goldstone; Anna Golebiewska; Luciana R Gomes; Rodrigo Gomez; Rubén Gómez-Sánchez; Maria Catalina Gomez-Puerto; Raquel Gomez-Sintes; Qingqiu Gong; Felix M Goni; Javier González-Gallego; Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez; Rosa A Gonzalez-Polo; Jose A Gonzalez-Reyes; Patricia González-Rodríguez; Ing Swie Goping; Marina S Gorbatyuk; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Kıvanç Görgülü; Roxana M Gorojod; Sharon M Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Cecilia Gotor; Roberta A Gottlieb; Illana Gozes; Devrim Gozuacik; Martin Graef; Markus H Gräler; Veronica Granatiero; Daniel Grasso; Joshua P Gray; Douglas R Green; Alexander Greenhough; Stephen L Gregory; Edward F Griffin; Mark W Grinstaff; Frederic Gros; Charles Grose; Angelina S Gross; Florian Gruber; Paolo Grumati; Tilman Grune; Xueyan Gu; Jun-Lin Guan; Carlos M Guardia; Kishore Guda; Flora Guerra; Consuelo Guerri; Prasun Guha; Carlos Guillén; Shashi Gujar; Anna Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Andreas Günther; Anyonya R Guntur; Chuanyong Guo; Chun Guo; Hongqing Guo; Lian-Wang Guo; Ming Guo; Pawan Gupta; Shashi Kumar Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Veer Bala Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Asa B Gustafsson; David D Gutterman; Ranjitha H B; Annakaisa Haapasalo; James E Haber; Aleksandra Hać; Shinji Hadano; Anders J Hafrén; Mansour Haidar; Belinda S Hall; Gunnel Halldén; Anne Hamacher-Brady; Andrea Hamann; Maho Hamasaki; Weidong Han; Malene Hansen; Phyllis I Hanson; Zijian Hao; Masaru Harada; Ljubica Harhaji-Trajkovic; Nirmala Hariharan; Nigil Haroon; James Harris; Takafumi Hasegawa; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Jeffrey A Haspel; Volker Haucke; Wayne D Hawkins; Bruce A Hay; Cole M Haynes; Soren B Hayrabedyan; Thomas S Hays; Congcong He; Qin He; Rong-Rong He; You-Wen He; Yu-Ying He; Yasser Heakal; Alexander M Heberle; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Gudmundur Vignir Helgason; Vanessa Henkel; Marc Herb; Alexander Hergovich; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Agustín Hernández; Carlos Hernandez; Sergio Hernandez-Diaz; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Amaury Herpin; Judit Herreros; Javier H Hervás; Daniel Hesselson; Claudio Hetz; Volker T Heussler; Yujiro Higuchi; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; William S Hlavacek; Emmanuel A Ho; Idy H T Ho; Philip Wing-Lok Ho; Shu-Leong Ho; Wan Yun Ho; G Aaron Hobbs; Mark Hochstrasser; Peter H M Hoet; Daniel Hofius; Paul Hofman; Annika Höhn; Carina I Holmberg; Jose R Hombrebueno; Chang-Won Hong Yi-Ren Hong; Lora V Hooper; Thorsten Hoppe; Rastislav Horos; Yujin Hoshida; I-Lun Hsin; Hsin-Yun Hsu; Bing Hu; Dong Hu; Li-Fang Hu; Ming Chang Hu; Ronggui Hu; Wei Hu; Yu-Chen Hu; Zhuo-Wei Hu; Fang Hua; Jinlian Hua; Yingqi Hua; Chongmin Huan; Canhua Huang; Chuanshu Huang; Chuanxin Huang; Chunling Huang; Haishan Huang; Kun Huang; Michael L H Huang; Rui Huang; Shan Huang; Tianzhi Huang; Xing Huang; Yuxiang Jack Huang; Tobias B Huber; Virginie Hubert; Christian A Hubner; Stephanie M Hughes; William E Hughes; Magali Humbert; Gerhard Hummer; James H Hurley; Sabah Hussain; Salik Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Martina Hutabarat; Hui-Yun Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Antonio Ieni; Fumiyo Ikeda; Yusuke Imagawa; Yuzuru Imai; Carol Imbriano; Masaya Imoto; Denise M Inman; Ken Inoki; Juan Iovanna; Renato V Iozzo; Giuseppe Ippolito; Javier E Irazoqui; Pablo Iribarren; Mohd Ishaq; Makoto Ishikawa; Nestor Ishimwe; Ciro Isidoro; Nahed Ismail; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Eisuke Itakura; Daisuke Ito; Davor Ivankovic; Saška Ivanova; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; José M Izquierdo; Masanori Izumi; Marja Jäättelä; Majid Sakhi Jabir; William T Jackson; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Anne-Claire Jacomin; Elise Jacquin; Pooja Jadiya; Hartmut Jaeschke; Chinnaswamy Jagannath; Arjen J Jakobi; Johan Jakobsson; Bassam Janji; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Patric J Jansson; Jonathan Jantsch; Sławomir Januszewski; Alagie Jassey; Steve Jean; Hélène Jeltsch-David; Pavla Jendelova; Andreas Jenny; Thomas E Jensen; Niels Jessen; Jenna L Jewell; Jing Ji; Lijun Jia; Rui Jia; Liwen Jiang; Qing Jiang; Richeng Jiang; Teng Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Yu Jiang; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Eun-Jung Jin; Fengyan Jin; Hongchuan Jin; Li Jin; Luqi Jin; Meiyan Jin; Si Jin; Eun-Kyeong Jo; Carine Joffre; Terje Johansen; Gail V W Johnson; Simon A Johnston; Eija Jokitalo; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Leo A B Joosten; Joaquin Jordan; Bertrand Joseph; Dianwen Ju; Jeong-Sun Ju; Jingfang Ju; Esmeralda Juárez; Delphine Judith; Gábor Juhász; Youngsoo Jun; Chang Hwa Jung; Sung-Chul Jung; Yong Keun Jung; Heinz Jungbluth; Johannes Jungverdorben; Steffen Just; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Daniel Kaganovich; Alon Kahana; Renate Kain; Shinjo Kajimura; Maria Kalamvoki; Manjula Kalia; Danuta S Kalinowski; Nina Kaludercic; Ioanna Kalvari; Joanna Kaminska; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Keizo Kanasaki; Chanhee Kang; Rui Kang; Sang Sun Kang; Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Marc Kantorow; Orsolya Kapuy; Michalis V Karamouzis; Md Razaul Karim; Parimal Karmakar; Rajesh G Katare; Masaru Kato; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Anu Kauppinen; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Kiyoshi Kawasaki; Kemal Kazan; Po-Yuan Ke; Damien J Keating; Ursula Keber; John H Kehrl; Kate E Keller; Christian W Keller; Jongsook Kim Kemper; Candia M Kenific; Oliver Kepp; Stephanie Kermorgant; Andreas Kern; Robin Ketteler; Tom G Keulers; Boris Khalfin; Hany Khalil; Bilon Khambu; Shahid Y Khan; Vinoth Kumar Megraj Khandelwal; Rekha Khandia; Widuri Kho; Noopur V Khobrekar; Sataree Khuansuwan; Mukhran Khundadze; Samuel A Killackey; Dasol Kim; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Eun Young Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hak-Rim Kim; Hee-Sik Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Jin-Hoi Kim; Joungmok Kim; Ju Hwan Kim; Keun Il Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong-Jun Kim; Scot R Kimball; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Tomonori Kimura; Matthew A King; Kerri J Kinghorn; Conan G Kinsey; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Sergey L Kiselev; Shuji Kishi; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Yasushi Kitaoka; Kaio Kitazato; Richard N Kitsis; Josef T Kittler; Ole Kjaerulff; Peter S Klein; Thomas Klopstock; Jochen Klucken; Helene Knævelsrud; Roland L Knorr; Ben C B Ko; Fred Ko; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Hotaka Kobayashi; Satoru Kobayashi; Ina Koch; Jan C Koch; Ulrich Koenig; Donat Kögel; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Sepp D Kohlwein; Nur M Kocaturk; Masaaki Komatsu; Jeannette König; Toru Kono; Benjamin T Kopp; Tamas Korcsmaros; Gözde Korkmaz; Viktor I Korolchuk; Mónica Suárez Korsnes; Ali Koskela; Janaiah Kota; Yaichiro Kotake; Monica L Kotler; Yanjun Kou; Michael I Koukourakis; Evangelos Koustas; Attila L Kovacs; Tibor Kovács; Daisuke Koya; Tomohiro Kozako; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Anna D Krasnodembskaya; Carole Kretz-Remy; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Sabine Kuenen; Lars Kuerschner; Thomas Kukar; Ajay Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Deepak Kumar; Dhiraj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Shinji Kume; Caroline Kumsta; Chanakya N Kundu; Mondira Kundu; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Lukasz Kurgan; Tatiana G Kutateladze; Ozlem Kutlu; SeongAe Kwak; Ho Jeong Kwon; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Yong Tae Kwon; Irene Kyrmizi; Albert La Spada; Patrick Labonté; Sylvain Ladoire; Ilaria Laface; Frank Lafont; Diane C Lagace; Vikramjit Lahiri; Zhibing Lai; Angela S Laird; Aparna Lakkaraju; Trond Lamark; Sheng-Hui Lan; Ane Landajuela; Darius J R Lane; Jon D Lane; Charles H Lang; Carsten Lange; Ülo Langel; Rupert Langer; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn Laporte; Nicholas F LaRusso; Isabel Lastres-Becker; Wilson Chun Yu Lau; Gordon W Laurie; Sergio Lavandero; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Helen Ka-Wai Law; Rob Layfield; Weidong Le; Herve Le Stunff; Alexandre Y Leary; Jean-Jacques Lebrun; Lionel Y W Leck; Jean-Philippe Leduc-Gaudet; Changwook Lee; Chung-Pei Lee; Da-Hye Lee; Edward B Lee; Erinna F Lee; Gyun Min Lee; He-Jin Lee; Heung Kyu Lee; Jae Man Lee; Jason S Lee; Jin-A Lee; Joo-Yong Lee; Jun Hee Lee; Michael Lee; Min Goo Lee; Min Jae Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Stella Y Lee; Sung Bae Lee; Won Hee Lee; Ying-Ray Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Youngil Lee; Christophe Lefebvre; Renaud Legouis; Yu L Lei; Yuchen Lei; Sergey Leikin; Gerd Leitinger; Leticia Lemus; Shuilong Leng; Olivia Lenoir; Guido Lenz; Heinz Josef Lenz; Paola Lenzi; Yolanda León; Andréia M Leopoldino; Christoph Leschczyk; Stina Leskelä; Elisabeth Letellier; Chi-Ting Leung; Po Sing Leung; Jeremy S Leventhal; Beth Levine; Patrick A Lewis; Klaus Ley; Bin Li; Da-Qiang Li; Jianming Li; Jing Li; Jiong Li; Ke Li; Liwu Li; Mei Li; Min Li; Min Li; Ming Li; Mingchuan Li; Pin-Lan Li; Ming-Qing Li; Qing Li; Sheng Li; Tiangang Li; Wei Li; Wenming Li; Xue Li; Yi-Ping Li; Yuan Li; Zhiqiang Li; Zhiyong Li; Zhiyuan Li; Jiqin Lian; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Weicheng Liang; Yongheng Liang; YongTian Liang; Guanghong Liao; Lujian Liao; Mingzhi Liao; Yung-Feng Liao; Mariangela Librizzi; Pearl P Y Lie; Mary A Lilly; Hyunjung J Lim; Thania R R Lima; Federica Limana; Chao Lin; Chih-Wen Lin; Dar-Shong Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kurt M Lin; Kwang-Huei Lin; Liang-Tzung Lin; Pei-Hui Lin; Qiong Lin; Shaofeng Lin; Su-Ju Lin; Wenyu Lin; Xueying Lin; Yao-Xin Lin; Yee-Shin Lin; Rafael Linden; Paula Lindner; Shuo-Chien Ling; Paul Lingor; Amelia K Linnemann; Yih-Cherng Liou; Marta M Lipinski; Saška Lipovšek; Vitor A Lira; Natalia Lisiak; Paloma B Liton; Chao Liu; Ching-Hsuan Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Cui Hua Liu; Fang Liu; Hao Liu; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Hua-Feng Liu; Huifang Liu; Jia Liu; Jing Liu; Julia Liu; Leyuan Liu; Longhua Liu; Meilian Liu; Qin Liu; Wei Liu; Wende Liu; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Xingguo Liu; Xu Liu; Xuedong Liu; Yanfen Liu; Yang Liu; Yang Liu; Yueyang Liu; Yule Liu; J Andrew Livingston; Gerard Lizard; Jose M Lizcano; Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer; Matilde E LLeonart; David Llobet-Navàs; Alicia Llorente; Chih Hung Lo; Damián Lobato-Márquez; Qi Long; Yun Chau Long; Ben Loos; Julia A Loos; Manuela G López; Guillermo López-Doménech; José Antonio López-Guerrero; Ana T López-Jiménez; Óscar López-Pérez; Israel López-Valero; Magdalena J Lorenowicz; Mar Lorente; Peter Lorincz; Laura Lossi; Sophie Lotersztajn; Penny E Lovat; Jonathan F Lovell; Alenka Lovy; Péter Lőw; Guang Lu; Haocheng Lu; Jia-Hong Lu; Jin-Jian Lu; Mengji Lu; Shuyan Lu; Alessandro Luciani; John M Lucocq; Paula Ludovico; Micah A Luftig; Morten Luhr; Diego Luis-Ravelo; Julian J Lum; Liany Luna-Dulcey; Anders H Lund; Viktor K Lund; Jan D Lünemann; Patrick Lüningschrör; Honglin Luo; Rongcan Luo; Shouqing Luo; Zhi Luo; Claudio Luparello; Bernhard Lüscher; Luan Luu; Alex Lyakhovich; Konstantin G Lyamzaev; Alf Håkon Lystad; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Alvin C Ma; Changle Ma; Mengxiao Ma; Ning-Fang Ma; Quan-Hong Ma; Xinliang Ma; Yueyun Ma; Zhenyi Ma; Ormond A MacDougald; Fernando Macian; Gustavo C MacIntosh; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Sandra Maday; Frank Madeo; Muniswamy Madesh; Tobias Madl; Julio Madrigal-Matute; Akiko Maeda; Yasuhiro Maejima; Marta Magarinos; Poornima Mahavadi; Emiliano Maiani; Kenneth Maiese; Panchanan Maiti; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Barbara Majello; Michael B Major; Elena Makareeva; Fayaz Malik; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Walter Malorni; Alina Maloyan; Najiba Mammadova; Gene Chi Wai Man; Federico Manai; Joseph D Mancias; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Michael A Mandell; Angelo A Manfredi; Masoud H Manjili; Ravi Manjithaya; Patricio Manque; Bella B Manshian; Raquel Manzano; Claudia Manzoni; Kai Mao; Cinzia Marchese; Sandrine Marchetti; Anna Maria Marconi; Fabrizio Marcucci; Stefania Mardente; Olga A Mareninova; Marta Margeta; Muriel Mari; Sara Marinelli; Oliviero Marinelli; Guillermo Mariño; Sofia Mariotto; Richard S Marshall; Mark R Marten; Sascha Martens; Alexandre P J Martin; Katie R Martin; Sara Martin; Shaun Martin; Adrián Martín-Segura; Miguel A Martín-Acebes; Inmaculada Martin-Burriel; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Paloma Martin-Sanz; José A Martina; Wim Martinet; Aitor Martinez; Ana Martinez; Jennifer Martinez; Moises Martinez Velazquez; Nuria Martinez-Lopez; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Daniel O Martins; Joilson O Martins; Waleska K Martins; Tania Martins-Marques; Emanuele Marzetti; Shashank Masaldan; Celine Masclaux-Daubresse; Douglas G Mashek; Valentina Massa; Lourdes Massieu; Glenn R Masson; Laura Masuelli; Anatoliy I Masyuk; Tetyana V Masyuk; Paola Matarrese; Ander Matheu; Satoaki Matoba; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Pamela Mattar; Alessandro Matte; Domenico Mattoscio; José L Mauriz; Mario Mauthe; Caroline Mauvezin; Emanual Maverakis; Paola Maycotte; Johanna Mayer; Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Cristina Mazzoni; Joseph R Mazzulli; Nami McCarty; Christine McDonald; Mitchell R McGill; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Fionn McLoughlin; Mark A McNiven; Thomas G McWilliams; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Tania Catarina Medeiros; Diego L Medina; Lynn A Megeney; Klara Megyeri; Maryam Mehrpour; Jawahar L Mehta; Alfred J Meijer; Annemarie H Meijer; Jakob Mejlvang; Alicia Meléndez; Annette Melk; Gonen Memisoglu; Alexandrina F Mendes; Delong Meng; Fei Meng; Tian Meng; Rubem Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Carol Mercer; Anne E Mercier; Jean-Louis Mergny; Adalberto Merighi; Seth D Merkley; Giuseppe Merla; Volker Meske; Ana Cecilia Mestre; Shree Padma Metur; Christian Meyer; Hemmo Meyer; Wenyi Mi; Jeanne Mialet-Perez; Junying Miao; Lucia Micale; Yasuo Miki; Enrico Milan; Małgorzata Milczarek; Dana L Miller; Samuel I Miller; Silke Miller; Steven W Millward; Ira Milosevic; Elena A Minina; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Mehdi Mirzaei; Amit Mishra; Nandita Mishra; Paras Kumar Mishra; Maja Misirkic Marjanovic; Roberta Misasi; Amit Misra; Gabriella Misso; Claire Mitchell; Geraldine Mitou; Tetsuji Miura; Shigeki Miyamoto; Makoto Miyazaki; Mitsunori Miyazaki; Taiga Miyazaki; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Trine H Mogensen; Baharia Mograbi; Reza Mohammadinejad; Yasir Mohamud; Abhishek Mohanty; Sipra Mohapatra; Torsten Möhlmann; Asif Mohmmed; Anna Moles; Kelle H Moley; Maurizio Molinari; Vincenzo Mollace; Andreas Buch Møller; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Costanza Montagna; Mervyn J Monteiro; Andrea Montella; L Ruth Montes; Barbara Montico; Vinod K Mony; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Michael N Moore; Mohammad A Moosavi; Ana L Mora; Marina Mora; David Morales-Alamo; Rosario Moratalla; Paula I Moreira; Elena Morelli; Sandra Moreno; Daniel Moreno-Blas; Viviana Moresi; Benjamin Morga; Alwena H Morgan; Fabrice Morin; Hideaki Morishita; Orson L Moritz; Mariko Moriyama; Yuji Moriyasu; Manuela Morleo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose F Moruno-Manchon; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Elisa Motori; Andrea Felinto Moura; Naima Moustaid-Moussa; Maria Mrakovcic; Gabriel Muciño-Hernández; Anupam Mukherjee; Subhadip Mukhopadhyay; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Victoriano Mulero; Sylviane Muller; Christian Münch; Ashok Munjal; Pura Munoz-Canoves; Teresa Muñoz-Galdeano; Christian Münz; Tomokazu Murakawa; Claudia Muratori; Brona M Murphy; J Patrick Murphy; Aditya Murthy; Timo T Myöhänen; Indira U Mysorekar; Jennifer Mytych; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi; Massimo Nabissi; Péter Nagy; Jihoon Nah; Aimable Nahimana; Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Nakamura; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Shyam S Nandi; Meera Nanjundan; Monica Nanni; Gennaro Napolitano; Roberta Nardacci; Masashi Narita; Melissa Nassif; Ilana Nathan; Manabu Natsumeda; Ryno J Naude; Christin Naumann; Olaia Naveiras; Fatemeh Navid; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Francesca Nazio; Florentina Negoita; Thomas Neill; Amanda L Neisch; Luca M Neri; Mihai G Netea; Patrick Neubert; Thomas P Neufeld; Dietbert Neumann; Albert Neutzner; Phillip T Newton; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Charlene C W Ng; Tzi Bun Ng; Hang T T Nguyen; Long T Nguyen; Hong-Min Ni; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Zhenhong Ni; M Celeste Nicolao; Francesco Nicoli; Manuel Nieto-Diaz; Per Nilsson; Shunbin Ning; Rituraj Niranjan; Hiroshi Nishimune; Mireia Niso-Santano; Ralph A Nixon; Annalisa Nobili; Clevio Nobrega; Takeshi Noda; Uxía Nogueira-Recalde; Trevor M Nolan; Ivan Nombela; Ivana Novak; Beatriz Novoa; Takashi Nozawa; Nobuyuki Nukina; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Jesper Nylandsted; Tracey R O'Donovan; Seónadh M O'Leary; Eyleen J O'Rourke; Mary P O'Sullivan; Timothy E O'Sullivan; Salvatore Oddo; Ina Oehme; Michinaga Ogawa; Eric Ogier-Denis; Margret H Ogmundsdottir; Besim Ogretmen; Goo Taeg Oh; Seon-Hee Oh; Young J Oh; Takashi Ohama; Yohei Ohashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Vasileios Oikonomou; Rani Ojha; Koji Okamoto; Hitoshi Okazawa; Masahide Oku; Sara Oliván; Jorge M A Oliveira; Michael Ollmann; James A Olzmann; Shakib Omari; M Bishr Omary; Gizem Önal; Martin Ondrej; Sang-Bing Ong; Sang-Ging Ong; Anna Onnis; Juan A Orellana; Sara Orellana-Muñoz; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elena Ortona; Heinz D Osiewacz; Abdel-Hamid K Osman; Rosario Osta; Marisa S Otegui; Kinya Otsu; Christiane Ott; Luisa Ottobrini; Jing-Hsiung James Ou; Tiago F Outeiro; Inger Oynebraten; Melek Ozturk; Gilles Pagès; Susanta Pahari; Marta Pajares; Utpal B Pajvani; Rituraj Pal; Simona Paladino; Nicolas Pallet; Michela Palmieri; Giuseppe Palmisano; Camilla Palumbo; Francesco Pampaloni; Lifeng Pan; Qingjun Pan; Wenliang Pan; Xin Pan; Ganna Panasyuk; Rahul Pandey; Udai B Pandey; Vrajesh Pandya; Francesco Paneni; Shirley Y Pang; Elisa Panzarini; Daniela L Papademetrio; Elena Papaleo; Daniel Papinski; Diana Papp; Eun Chan Park; Hwan Tae Park; Ji-Man Park; Jong-In Park; Joon Tae Park; Junsoo Park; Sang Chul Park; Sang-Youel Park; Abraham H Parola; Jan B Parys; Adrien Pasquier; Benoit Pasquier; João F Passos; Nunzia Pastore; Hemal H Patel; Daniel Patschan; Sophie Pattingre; Gustavo Pedraza-Alva; Jose Pedraza-Chaverri; Zully Pedrozo; Gang Pei; Jianming Pei; Hadas Peled-Zehavi; Joaquín M Pellegrini; Joffrey Pelletier; Miguel A Peñalva; Di Peng; Ying Peng; Fabio Penna; Maria Pennuto; Francesca Pentimalli; Cláudia Mf Pereira; Gustavo J S Pereira; Lilian C Pereira; Luis Pereira de Almeida; Nirma D Perera; Ángel Pérez-Lara; Ana B Perez-Oliva; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Palsamy Periyasamy; Andras Perl; Cristiana Perrotta; Ida Perrotta; Richard G Pestell; Morten Petersen; Irina Petrache; Goran Petrovski; Thorsten Pfirrmann; Astrid S Pfister; Jennifer A Philips; Huifeng Pi; Anna Picca; Alicia M Pickrell; Sandy Picot; Giovanna M Pierantoni; Marina Pierdominici; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Karolina Pierzynowska; Federico Pietrocola; Miroslawa Pietruczuk; Claudio Pignata; Felipe X Pimentel-Muiños; Mario Pinar; Roberta O Pinheiro; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Paolo Pinton; Karolina Pircs; Sujan Piya; Paola Pizzo; Theo S Plantinga; Harald W Platta; Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala; Markus Plomann; Egor Y Plotnikov; Helene Plun-Favreau; Ryszard Pluta; Roger Pocock; Stefanie Pöggeler; Christian Pohl; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Marisa Ponpuak; Hana Popelka; Blagovesta Popova; Helena Porta; Soledad Porte Alcon; Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Martin Post; Malia B Potts; Joanna Poulton; Ted Powers; Veena Prahlad; Tomasz K Prajsnar; Domenico Praticò; Rosaria Prencipe; Muriel Priault; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Vasilis J Promponas; Christopher G Proud; Rosa Puertollano; Luigi Puglielli; Thomas Pulinilkunnil; Deepika Puri; Rajat Puri; Julien Puyal; Xiaopeng Qi; Yongmei Qi; Wenbin Qian; Lei Qiang; Yu Qiu; Joe Quadrilatero; Jorge Quarleri; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Debora Ragona; Michael J Ragusa; Nader Rahimi; Marveh Rahmati; Valeria Raia; Nuno Raimundo; Namakkal-Soorappan Rajasekaran; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Abdelhaq Rami; Ignacio Ramírez-Pardo; David B Ramsden; Felix Randow; Pundi N Rangarajan; Danilo Ranieri; Hai Rao; Lang Rao; Rekha Rao; Sumit Rathore; J Arjuna Ratnayaka; Edward A Ratovitski; Palaniyandi Ravanan; Gloria Ravegnini; Swapan K Ray; Babak Razani; Vito Rebecca; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; David Reigada; Jan H Reiling; Theo Rein; Siegfried Reipert; Rokeya Sultana Rekha; Hongmei Ren; Jun Ren; Weichao Ren; Tristan Renault; Giorgia Renga; Karen Reue; Kim Rewitz; Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos; S Amer Riazuddin; Teresa M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Romeo Ricci; Victoria Riccio; Des R Richardson; Yasuko Rikihisa; Makarand V Risbud; Ruth M Risueño; Konstantinos Ritis; Salvatore Rizza; Rosario Rizzuto; Helen C Roberts; Luke D Roberts; Katherine J Robinson; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; George G Rodney; Tiago Rodrigues; Vagner Ramon Rodrigues Silva; Amaia Rodriguez; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Nieves Rodriguez-Henche; Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Jeroen Roelofs; Robert S Rogers; Vladimir V Rogov; Ana I Rojo; Krzysztof Rolka; Vanina Romanello; Luigina Romani; Alessandra Romano; Patricia S Romano; David Romeo-Guitart; Luis C Romero; Montserrat Romero; Joseph C Roney; Christopher Rongo; Sante Roperto; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Philip Rosenstiel; Anne G Rosenwald; Kevin A Roth; Lynn Roth; Steven Roth; Kasper M A Rouschop; Benoit D Roussel; Sophie Roux; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Ajit Roy; Aurore Rozieres; Diego Ruano; David C Rubinsztein; Maria P Rubtsova; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Christoph Ruckenstuhl; Emil Rudolf; Rüdiger Rudolf; Alessandra Ruggieri; Avnika Ashok Ruparelia; Paola Rusmini; Ryan R Russell; Gian Luigi Russo; Maria Russo; Rossella Russo; Oxana O Ryabaya; Kevin M Ryan; Kwon-Yul Ryu; Maria Sabater-Arcis; Ulka Sachdev; Michael Sacher; Carsten Sachse; Abhishek Sadhu; Junichi Sadoshima; Nathaniel Safren; Paul Saftig; Antonia P Sagona; Gaurav Sahay; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mustafa Sahin; Ozgur Sahin; Sumit Sahni; Nayuta Saito; Shigeru Saito; Tsunenori Saito; Ryohei Sakai; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Kalle Saksela; Gloria Salazar; Anna Salazar-Degracia; Ghasem H Salekdeh; Ashok K Saluja; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Maria Cecilia Sanchez; Jose A Sanchez-Alcazar; Victoria Sanchez-Vera; Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu; J Thomas Sanderson; Marco Sandri; Stefano Santaguida; Laura Santambrogio; Magda M Santana; Giorgio Santoni; Alberto Sanz; Pascual Sanz; Shweta Saran; Marco Sardiello; Timothy J Sargeant; Apurva Sarin; Chinmoy Sarkar; Sovan Sarkar; Maria-Rosa Sarrias; Surajit Sarkar; Dipanka Tanu Sarmah; Jaakko Sarparanta; Aishwarya Sathyanarayan; Ranganayaki Sathyanarayanan; K Matthew Scaglione; Francesca Scatozza; Liliana Schaefer; Zachary T Schafer; Ulrich E Schaible; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schatzl; Catherine H Schein; Wiep Scheper; David Scheuring; Maria Vittoria Schiaffino; Monica Schiappacassi; Rainer Schindl; Uwe Schlattner; Oliver Schmidt; Roland Schmitt; Stephen D Schmidt; Ingo Schmitz; Eran Schmukler; Anja Schneider; Bianca E Schneider; Romana Schober; Alejandra C Schoijet; Micah B Schott; Michael Schramm; Bernd Schröder; Kai Schuh; Christoph Schüller; Ryan J Schulze; Lea Schürmanns; Jens C Schwamborn; Melanie Schwarten; Filippo Scialo; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Melanie J Scott; Kathleen W Scotto; A Ivana Scovassi; Andrea Scrima; Aurora Scrivo; David Sebastian; Salwa Sebti; Simon Sedej; Laura Segatori; Nava Segev; Per O Seglen; Iban Seiliez; Ekihiro Seki; Scott B Selleck; Frank W Sellke; Joshua T Selsby; Michael Sendtner; Serif Senturk; Elena Seranova; Consolato Sergi; Ruth Serra-Moreno; Hiromi Sesaki; Carmine Settembre; Subba Rao Gangi Setty; Gianluca Sgarbi; Ou Sha; John J Shacka; Javeed A Shah; Dantong Shang; Changshun Shao; Feng Shao; Soroush Sharbati; Lisa M Sharkey; Dipali Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Kulbhushan Sharma; Pawan Sharma; Surendra Sharma; Han-Ming Shen; Hongtao Shen; Jiangang Shen; Ming Shen; Weili Shen; Zheni Shen; Rui Sheng; Zhi Sheng; Zu-Hang Sheng; Jianjian Shi; Xiaobing Shi; Ying-Hong Shi; Kahori Shiba-Fukushima; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Makoto Shimozawa; Takahiro Shintani; Christopher J Shoemaker; Shahla Shojaei; Ikuo Shoji; Bhupendra V Shravage; Viji Shridhar; Chih-Wen Shu; Hong-Bing Shu; Ke Shui; Arvind K Shukla; Timothy E Shutt; Valentina Sica; Aleem Siddiqui; Amanda Sierra; Virginia Sierra-Torre; Santiago Signorelli; Payel Sil; Bruno J de Andrade Silva; Johnatas D Silva; Eduardo Silva-Pavez; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Rachel E Simmonds; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Matias Simons; Anurag Singh; Lalit P Singh; Rajat Singh; Shivendra V Singh; Shrawan K Singh; Sudha B Singh; Sunaina Singh; Surinder Pal Singh; Debasish Sinha; Rohit Anthony Sinha; Sangita Sinha; Agnieszka Sirko; Kapil Sirohi; Efthimios L Sivridis; Panagiotis Skendros; Aleksandra Skirycz; Iva Slaninová; Soraya S Smaili; Andrei Smertenko; Matthew D Smith; Stefaan J Soenen; Eun Jung Sohn; Sophia P M Sok; Giancarlo Solaini; Thierry Soldati; Scott A Soleimanpour; Rosa M Soler; Alexei Solovchenko; Jason A Somarelli; Avinash Sonawane; Fuyong Song; Hyun Kyu Song; Ju-Xian Song; Kunhua Song; Zhiyin Song; Leandro R Soria; Maurizio Sorice; Alexander A Soukas; Sandra-Fausia Soukup; Diana Sousa; Nadia Sousa; Paul A Spagnuolo; Stephen A Spector; M M Srinivas Bharath; Daret St Clair; Venturina Stagni; Leopoldo Staiano; Clint A Stalnecker; Metodi V Stankov; Peter B Stathopulos; Katja Stefan; Sven Marcel Stefan; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Alexander Steinkasserer; Harald Stenmark; Jared Sterneckert; Craig Stevens; Veronika Stoka; Stephan Storch; Björn Stork; Flavie Strappazzon; Anne Marie Strohecker; Dwayne G Stupack; Huanxing Su; Ling-Yan Su; Longxiang Su; Ana M Suarez-Fontes; Carlos S Subauste; Selvakumar Subbian; Paula V Subirada; Ganapasam Sudhandiran; Carolyn M Sue; Xinbing Sui; Corey Summers; Guangchao Sun; Jun Sun; Kang Sun; Meng-Xiang Sun; Qiming Sun; Yi Sun; Zhongjie Sun; Karen K S Sunahara; Eva Sundberg; Katalin Susztak; Peter Sutovsky; Hidekazu Suzuki; Gary Sweeney; J David Symons; Stephen Cho Wing Sze; Nathaniel J Szewczyk; Anna Tabęcka-Łonczynska; Claudio Tabolacci; Frank Tacke; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Mitsuo Tagaya; Haoran Tai; Stephen W G Tait; Yoshinori Takahashi; Szabolcs Takats; Priti Talwar; Chit Tam; Shing Yau Tam; Davide Tampellini; Atsushi Tamura; Chong Teik Tan; Eng-King Tan; Ya-Qin Tan; Masaki Tanaka; Motomasa Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Jingfeng Tang; Tie-Shan Tang; Isei Tanida; Zhipeng Tao; Mohammed Taouis; Lars Tatenhorst; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Allen Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; Joan M Taylor; Elena Tchetina; Andrew R Tee; Irmgard Tegeder; David Teis; Natercia Teixeira; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Kumsal A Tekirdag; Tewin Tencomnao; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexei V Tepikin; Pilar S Testillano; Gianluca Tettamanti; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Kathrin Thedieck; Arvind A Thekkinghat; Stefano Thellung; Josephine W Thinwa; V P Thirumalaikumar; Sufi Mary Thomas; Paul G Thomes; Andrew Thorburn; Lipi Thukral; Thomas Thum; Michael Thumm; Ling Tian; Ales Tichy; Andreas Till; Vincent Timmerman; Vladimir I Titorenko; Sokol V Todi; Krassimira Todorova; Janne M Toivonen; Luana Tomaipitinca; Dhanendra Tomar; Cristina Tomas-Zapico; Sergej Tomić; Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong; Chao Tong; Xin Tong; Sharon A Tooze; Maria L Torgersen; Satoru Torii; Liliana Torres-López; Alicia Torriglia; Christina G Towers; Roberto Towns; Shinya Toyokuni; Vladimir Trajkovic; Donatella Tramontano; Quynh-Giao Tran; Leonardo H Travassos; Charles B Trelford; Shirley Tremel; Ioannis P Trougakos; Betty P Tsao; Mario P Tschan; Hung-Fat Tse; Tak Fu Tse; Hitoshi Tsugawa; Andrey S Tsvetkov; David A Tumbarello; Yasin Tumtas; María J Tuñón; Sandra Turcotte; Boris Turk; Vito Turk; Bradley J Turner; Richard I Tuxworth; Jessica K Tyler; Elena V Tyutereva; Yasuo Uchiyama; Aslihan Ugun-Klusek; Holm H Uhlig; Marzena Ułamek-Kozioł; Ilya V Ulasov; Midori Umekawa; Christian Ungermann; Rei Unno; Sylvie Urbe; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Suayib Üstün; Vladimir N Uversky; Thomas Vaccari; Maria I Vaccaro; Björn F Vahsen; Helin Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg; Rut Valdor; Maria J Valente; Ayelén Valko; Richard B Vallee; Angela M Valverde; Greet Van den Berghe; Stijn van der Veen; Luc Van Kaer; Jorg van Loosdregt; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Wim Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marcos A Vannier-Santos; Nicola Vannini; M Cristina Vanrell; Chiara Vantaggiato; Gabriele Varano; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Máté Varga; M Helena Vasconcelos; Somya Vats; Demetrios G Vavvas; Ignacio Vega-Naredo; Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis; Guillermo Velasco; Ariadna P Velázquez; Tibor Vellai; Edo Vellenga; Francesca Velotti; Mireille Verdier; Panayotis Verginis; Isabelle Vergne; Paul Verkade; Manish Verma; Patrik Verstreken; Tim Vervliet; Jörg Vervoorts; Alexandre T Vessoni; Victor M Victor; Michel Vidal; Chiara Vidoni; Otilia V Vieira; Richard D Vierstra; Sonia Viganó; Helena Vihinen; Vinoy Vijayan; Miquel Vila; Marçal Vilar; José M Villalba; Antonio Villalobo; Beatriz Villarejo-Zori; Francesc Villarroya; Joan Villarroya; Olivier Vincent; Cecile Vindis; Christophe Viret; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Dora Visnjic; Ilio Vitale; David J Vocadlo; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Cinzia Volonté; Mattia Volta; Marta Vomero; Clarissa Von Haefen; Marc A Vooijs; Wolfgang Voos; Ljubica Vucicevic; Richard Wade-Martins; Satoshi Waguri; Kenrick A Waite; Shuji Wakatsuki; David W Walker; Mark J Walker; Simon A Walker; Jochen Walter; Francisco G Wandosell; Bo Wang; Chao-Yung Wang; Chen Wang; Chenran Wang; Chenwei Wang; Cun-Yu Wang; Dong Wang; Fangyang Wang; Feng Wang; Fengming Wang; Guansong Wang; Han Wang; Hao Wang; Hexiang Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Jianrong Wang; Jigang Wang; Jiou Wang; Jundong Wang; Kui Wang; Lianrong Wang; Liming Wang; Maggie Haitian Wang; Meiqing Wang; Nanbu Wang; Pengwei Wang; Peipei Wang; Ping Wang; Ping Wang; Qing Jun Wang; Qing Wang; Qing Kenneth Wang; Qiong A Wang; Wen-Tao Wang; Wuyang Wang; Xinnan Wang; Xuejun Wang; Yan Wang; Yanchang Wang; Yanzhuang Wang; Yen-Yun Wang; Yihua Wang; Yipeng Wang; Yu Wang; Yuqi Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhenyu Wang; Zhouguang Wang; Gary Warnes; Verena Warnsmann; Hirotaka Watada; Eizo Watanabe; Maxinne Watchon; Anna Wawrzyńska; Timothy E Weaver; Grzegorz Wegrzyn; Ann M Wehman; Huafeng Wei; Lei Wei; Taotao Wei; Yongjie Wei; Oliver H Weiergräber; Conrad C Weihl; Günther Weindl; Ralf Weiskirchen; Alan Wells; Runxia H Wen; Xin Wen; Antonia Werner; Beatrice Weykopf; Sally P Wheatley; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Katarzyna Wiktorska; Manon E Wildenberg; Tom Wileman; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Brett Williams; Robin S B Williams; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Richard A Wilson; Beate Winner; Nathaniel J Winsor; Steven S Witkin; Harald Wodrich; Ute Woehlbier; Thomas Wollert; Esther Wong; Jack Ho Wong; Richard W Wong; Vincent Kam Wai Wong; W Wei-Lynn Wong; An-Guo Wu; Chengbiao Wu; Jian Wu; Junfang Wu; Kenneth K Wu; Min Wu; Shan-Ying Wu; Shengzhou Wu; Shu-Yan Wu; Shufang Wu; William K K Wu; Xiaohong Wu; Xiaoqing Wu; Yao-Wen Wu; Yihua Wu; Ramnik J Xavier; Hongguang Xia; Lixin Xia; Zhengyuan Xia; Ge Xiang; Jin Xiang; Mingliang Xiang; Wei Xiang; Bin Xiao; Guozhi Xiao; Hengyi Xiao; Hong-Tao Xiao; Jian Xiao; Lan Xiao; Shi Xiao; Yin Xiao; Baoming Xie; Chuan-Ming Xie; Min Xie; Yuxiang Xie; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Maria Xilouri; Congfeng Xu; En Xu; Haoxing Xu; Jing Xu; JinRong Xu; Liang Xu; Wen Wen Xu; Xiulong Xu; Yu Xue; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop; Masamitsu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yamaguchi; Ai Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Shengmin Yan; Shian-Jang Yan; Zhen Yan; Yasuo Yanagi; Chuanbin Yang; Dun-Sheng Yang; Huan Yang; Huang-Tian Yang; Hui Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Jing Yang; Jingyu Yang; Ling Yang; Liu Yang; Ming Yang; Pei-Ming Yang; Qian Yang; Seungwon Yang; Shu Yang; Shun-Fa Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Xiaoyong Yang; Xuesong Yang; Yi Yang; Ying Yang; Honghong Yao; Shenggen Yao; Xiaoqiang Yao; Yong-Gang Yao; Yong-Ming Yao; Takahiro Yasui; Meysam Yazdankhah; Paul M Yen; Cong Yi; Xiao-Ming Yin; Yanhai Yin; Zhangyuan Yin; Ziyi Yin; Meidan Ying; Zheng Ying; Calvin K Yip; Stephanie Pei Tung Yiu; Young H Yoo; Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Saori R Yoshii; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Bahman Yousefi; Boxuan Yu; Haiyang Yu; Jun Yu; Jun Yu; Li Yu; Ming-Lung Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Victor C Yu; W Haung Yu; Zhengping Yu; Zhou Yu; Junying Yuan; Ling-Qing Yuan; Shilin Yuan; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Yanggang Yuan; Zengqiang Yuan; Jianbo Yue; Zhenyu Yue; Jeanho Yun; Raymond L Yung; David N Zacks; Gabriele Zaffagnini; Vanessa O Zambelli; Isabella Zanella; Qun S Zang; Sara Zanivan; Silvia Zappavigna; Pilar Zaragoza; Konstantinos S Zarbalis; Amir Zarebkohan; Amira Zarrouk; Scott O Zeitlin; Jialiu Zeng; Ju-Deng Zeng; Eva Žerovnik; Lixuan Zhan; Bin Zhang; Donna D Zhang; Hanlin Zhang; Hong Zhang; Hong Zhang; Honghe Zhang; Huafeng Zhang; Huaye Zhang; Hui Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianbin Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Kalin Y B Zhang; Leshuai W Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lisheng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Luoying Zhang; Menghuan Zhang; Peng Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiangnan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Xinxin Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yanjin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ying-Dong Zhang; Yingmei Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yuchen Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Zhibing Zhang; Zhihai Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Zili Zhang; Haobin Zhao; Lei Zhao; Shuang Zhao; Tongbiao Zhao; Xiao-Fan Zhao; Ying Zhao; Yongchao Zhao; Yongliang Zhao; Yuting Zhao; Guoping Zheng; Kai Zheng; Ling Zheng; Shizhong Zheng; Xi-Long Zheng; Yi Zheng; Zu-Guo Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Ao Zhou; Ben Zhou; Cefan Zhou; Gang Zhou; Hao Zhou; Hong Zhou; Hongbo Zhou; Jie Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jiyong Zhou; Kailiang Zhou; Rongjia Zhou; Xu-Jie Zhou; Yanshuang Zhou; Yinghong Zhou; Yubin Zhou; Zheng-Yu Zhou; Zhou Zhou; Binglin Zhu; Changlian Zhu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Haining Zhu; Hongxin Zhu; Hua Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Yanping Zhu; Yushan Zhu; Haixia Zhuang; Xiaohong Zhuang; Katarzyna Zientara-Rytter; Christine M Zimmermann; Elena Ziviani; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Dmitry B Zorov; Antonio Zorzano; Weiping Zou; Zhen Zou; Zhengzhi Zou; Steven Zuryn; Werner Zwerschke; Beate Brand-Saberi; X Charlie Dong; Chandra Shekar Kenchappa; Zuguo Li; Yong Lin; Shigeru Oshima; Yueguang Rong; Judith C Sluimer; Christina L Stallings; Chun-Kit Tong
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 13.391

Review 6.  NAD+ Metabolism as an Emerging Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Diseases Associated With Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Weiyi Xu; Le Li; Lilei Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Autophagy-mediated metabolic effects of aspirin.

Authors:  Francesca Castoldi; Juliette Humeau; Isabelle Martins; Sylvie Lachkar; Damarys Loew; Florent Dingli; Sylvère Durand; David Enot; Noëlie Bossut; Alexis Chery; Fanny Aprahamian; Yohann Demont; Paule Opolon; Nicolas Signolle; Allan Sauvat; Michaela Semeraro; Lucillia Bezu; Elisa Elena Baracco; Erika Vacchelli; Jonathan G Pol; Sarah Lévesque; Norma Bloy; Valentina Sica; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Guido Kroemer; Federico Pietrocola
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 8.  The roles of the inhibitory autophagy regulator Rubicon in the heart: A new therapeutic target to prevent cardiac cell death.

Authors:  Jihoon Nah; Daniela Zablocki; Junichi Sadoshima
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 8.718

9.  Trehalose Ameliorates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Role of the PK2/PKR Pathway.

Authors:  Yuning Liu; Shi Wu; Qian Zhao; Zhen Yang; Xiaojun Yan; Cairong Li; Wenliang Zha; Wei Yu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Desmin aggrephagy in rat and human ischemic heart failure through PKCζ and GSK3β as upstream signaling pathways.

Authors:  Marion Bouvet; Emilie Dubois-Deruy; Annie Turkieh; Paul Mulder; Victoriane Peugnet; Maggy Chwastyniak; Olivia Beseme; Arthur Dechaumes; Philippe Amouyel; Vincent Richard; Nicolas Lamblin; Florence Pinet
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2021-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.