Literature DB >> 31504127

Estimation of Source-Specific Occupational Benzene Exposure in a Population-Based Case-Control Study of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Pamela J Dopart1, Sarah J Locke1, Pierluigi Cocco2, Bryan A Bassig1, Pabitra R Josse1, Patricia A Stewart3, Mark P Purdue1, Qing Lan1, Nathaniel Rothman1, Melissa C Friesen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Occupational exposures in population-based case-control studies are increasingly being assessed using decision rules that link participants' responses to occupational questionnaires to exposure estimates. We used a hierarchical process that incorporated decision rules and job-by-job expert review to assign occupational benzene exposure estimates in a US population-based case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
METHODS: We conducted a literature review to identify scenarios in which occupational benzene exposure has occurred, which we grouped into 12 categories of benzene exposure sources. For each source category, we then developed decision rules for assessing probability (ordinal scale based on the likelihood of exposure > 0.02 ppm), frequency (proportion of work time exposed), and intensity of exposure (in ppm). The rules used the participants' occupational history responses and, for a subset of jobs, responses to job- and industry-specific modules. For probability and frequency, we used a hierarchical assignment procedure that prioritized subject-specific module information when available. Next, we derived job-group medians from the module responses to assign estimates to jobs with only occupational history responses. Last, we used job-by-job expert review to assign estimates when job-group medians were not available or when the decision rules identified possible heterogeneous or rare exposure scenarios. For intensity, we developed separate estimates for each benzene source category that were based on published measurement data whenever possible. Frequency and intensity annual source-specific estimates were assigned only for those jobs assigned ≥75% probability of exposure. Annual source-specific concentrations (intensity × frequency) were summed to obtain a total annual benzene concentration for each job.
RESULTS: Of the 8827 jobs reported by participants, 8% required expert review for one or more source categories. Overall, 287 (3.3%) jobs were assigned ≥75% probability of exposure from any benzene source category. The source categories most commonly assigned ≥75% probability of exposure were gasoline and degreasing. The median total annual benzene concentration among jobs assigned ≥75% probability was 0.11 ppm (interquartile range: 0.06-0.55). The highest source-specific median annual concentrations were observed for ink and printing (2.3 and 1.2 ppm, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The applied framework captures some subject-specific variability in work tasks, provides transparency to the exposure decision process, and facilitates future sensitivity analyses. The developed decision rules can be used as a starting point by other researchers to assess occupational benzene exposure in future population-based studies. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Occupational Hygiene Society 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NHL; benzene; case–control study; retrospective exposure assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31504127      PMCID: PMC6788340          DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxz063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  22 in total

1.  Retrospective benzene exposure assessment for a multi-center case-cohort study of benzene-exposed workers in China.

Authors:  Lützen Portengen; Martha S Linet; Gui-Lan Li; Qing Lan; Graça M Dores; Bu-Tian Ji; Richard B Hayes; Song-Nian Yin; Nathaniel Rothman; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Developing estimates of frequency and intensity of exposure to three types of metalworking fluids in a population-based case-control study of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Melissa C Friesen; Dong-Uk Park; Joanne S Colt; Dalsu Baris; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Karla R Armenti; Alison Johnson; Debra T Silverman; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Occupational exposures to potentially hazardous agents in the petroleum industry.

Authors:  H E Runion
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Sep

4.  Carcinogenicity of benzene.

Authors:  Dana Loomis; Kathryn Z Guyton; Yann Grosse; Fatiha El Ghissassi; Véronique Bouvard; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Neela Guha; Nadia Vilahur; Heidi Mattock; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Combining a job-exposure matrix with exposure measurements to assess occupational exposure to benzene in a population cohort in shanghai, china.

Authors:  Melissa C Friesen; Joseph B Coble; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu; Bu-Tian Ji; Shouzheng Xue; Lutzen Portengen; Wong-Ho Chow; Yu-Tang Gao; Gong Yang; Nathaniel Rothman; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-10-05

Review 6.  Benzene and total hydrocarbons exposures in the downstream petroleum industries.

Authors:  D K Verma; D M Johnson; M L Shaw; K des Tombe
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Benzene in gasoline and crude oil: occupational and environmental implications.

Authors:  Dave K Verma; Karen des Tombe
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

8.  Comparison of two expert-based assessments of diesel exhaust exposure in a case-control study: programmable decision rules versus expert review of individual jobs.

Authors:  Anjoeka Pronk; Patricia A Stewart; Joseph B Coble; Hormuzd A Katki; David C Wheeler; Joanne S Colt; Dalsu Baris; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Alison Johnson; Richard Waddell; Castine Verrill; Sai Cherala; Debra T Silverman; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Decision rule approach applied to estimate occupational lead exposure in a case-control study of kidney cancer.

Authors:  Catherine L Callahan; Sarah J Locke; Pamela J Dopart; Patricia A Stewart; Kendra Schwartz; Julie J Ruterbusch; Barry I Graubard; Nathaniel Rothman; Jonathan N Hofmann; Mark P Purdue; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Occupational Exposure to Benzene and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Population-Based Cohort: The Shanghai Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Bryan A Bassig; Melissa C Friesen; Roel Vermeulen; Xiao-Ou Shu; Mark P Purdue; Patricia A Stewart; Yong-Bing Xiang; Wong-Ho Chow; Tongzhang Zheng; Bu-Tian Ji; Gong Yang; Martha S Linet; Wei Hu; Heping Zhang; Wei Zheng; Yu-Tang Gao; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adapting Decision Rules to Estimate Occupational Metalworking Fluid Exposure in a Case-Control Study of Bladder Cancer in Spain.

Authors:  Pabitra R Josse; Stella Koutros; Adonina Tardon; Nathaniel Rothman; Debra T Silverman; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.