Literature DB >> 31502327

Toward a Corporate Culture of Health: Results of a National Survey.

Michael Anne Kyle1, Lumumba Seegars1, John M Benson2, Robert J Blendon2, Robert S Huckman1, Sara J Singer3.   

Abstract

Policy Points The private sector has large potential influence over social determinants of health, but we have limited information about how businesses perceive or engage in actions to promote health and well-being. We conducted a national survey of more than 1,000 businesses of varying sizes and industries to benchmark private sector engagement in employee, environmental, consumer, and community health, which we collectively refer to as a corporate culture of health. Overall, the private sector is taking steps to foster health and well-being but still has substantial opportunity for growth. CONTEXT: The private sector has a large potential role in advancing health and well-being, but attention to corporate practices around health tends to focus on a narrow range of issues and on large businesses. Systematically describing private sector engagement in health and well-being is a necessary step toward understanding the current state of the field and developing an agenda for businesses going forward.
METHODS: We conducted a national survey of 1,017 private sector organizations to assess current levels of engagement in what we term a culture of health (CoH). We measured corporate CoH along four dimensions, which assess the extent to which businesses promote employee, environmental, consumer, and community health and well-being. We also explored potential explanations for the number of health-related actions taken in each dimension.
FINDINGS: On average, businesses took 38% of health-related actions included in our survey. For each dimension, we found variation among businesses in the number of actions taken (on average, there were almost fourfold differences between the bottom and top quartiles of businesses in terms of actions taken). Mentioning health and well-being in the corporate mission, having a strategic plan for CoH, and perceiving a positive return on CoH investments were all associated with businesses' actions taken. Fewer than half of businesses, however, perceived a positive return on their CoH investments.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the private sector is taking steps to foster health and well-being. However, there remains substantial variation among businesses and opportunity for growth, even among those currently taking the most action. Strengthening the business case for a corporate CoH may increase private sector investments in health and well-being. Actions taken by individual businesses, business groups, industries, and regulators have the potential to improve corporate engagement and impact.
© 2019 Milbank Memorial Fund.

Keywords:  corporate health; health policy; public health; social determinants of health

Year:  2019        PMID: 31502327      PMCID: PMC6904256          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  6 in total

1.  Health as a Way of Doing Business.

Authors:  Howard K Koh; Sara J Singer; Amy C Edmondson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Tracking The Changing Landscape Of Corporate Wellness Companies.

Authors:  Jean Abraham; Katie M White
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Government Spending In Health And Nonhealth Sectors Associated With Improvement In County Health Rankings.

Authors:  J Mac McCullough; Jonathon P Leider
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Drivers Of Health As A Shared Value: Mindset, Expectations, Sense Of Community, And Civic Engagement.

Authors:  Anita Chandra; Carolyn E Miller; Joie D Acosta; Sarah Weilant; Matthew Trujillo; Alonzo Plough
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Reducing hospital errors: interventions that build safety culture.

Authors:  Sara J Singer; Timothy J Vogus
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Cross-Sectoral Partnerships By Area Agencies On Aging: Associations With Health Care Use And Spending.

Authors:  Amanda L Brewster; Suzanne Kunkel; Jane Straker; Leslie A Curry
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.301

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ill health and distraction at work: Costs and drivers for productivity loss.

Authors:  Piotr Bialowolski; Eileen McNeely; Tyler J VanderWeele; Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Corporate Application of Health Literacy.

Authors:  Natascha Hochmuth; Kristine Sørensen
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2021-08-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.