Literature DB >> 31502075

Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is not superior to open: Author's reply.

B Pokala1,2, P R Armijo2, L Flores2,3, D Hennings1,2, Dmitry Oleynikov4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31502075     DOI： 10.1007/s10029-019-02044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN： 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Spyridon Pagkratis; Eugene Boilesen; Tiffany Tanner; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is not superior to open.

Authors:  S Huerta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review.

Authors:  B Pokala; P R Armijo; L Flores; D Hennings; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Identifying patients at risk for urinary retention following inguinal herniorrhaphy: a single institution study.

Authors:  B R Hall; P R Armijo; B Grams; D Lomelin; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.739
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia repair: a single-center case-matched study.

Authors:  Sullivan A Ayuso; Matthew N Marturano; Michael M Katzen; Bola G Aladegbami; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.453
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.