Literature DB >> 31502033

Primary robotic RLPND for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: a two-center analysis of intermediate oncologic and safety outcomes.

Nicholas R Rocco1, Sean P Stroup2, Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin3, Michael T Marshall1, Michael G Santomauro1, Matthew S Christman1, James O L'Esperance1, Erik P Castle3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intermediate-term oncologic outcomes and safety profile of the largest case series of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for low-clinical-stage non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer.
METHODS: This was a two-center retrospective analysis of robotic RPLND cases for low-clinical-stage (stage I-IIB) non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer in the primary setting. Demographic, perioperative, operative and oncologic variables were collected between March 2008 and May 2019. Descriptive analyses were performed and presented as medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables and frequency and proportions for categorical variables. A survival analysis of time to recurrence was performed using Cox proportional hazards model. Using logistic regression, risk factors for complications were analyzed. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (CS 1 = 56, CS IIA = 2, CS IIB = 0) were identified. The median follow-up was 47 months and the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 91%. The five recurrences were all out of the performed dissection template (pelvis = 1 and lung = 4). Only five patients (29%) with occult metastasis underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. The median operative time was 319 min [interquartile range (IQR) 276-355 min], estimated blood loss was 100 ml (IQR 75-200 ml), node count was 26 (IQR 20-31), and length of stay 2 d (IQR 1-3 days). There were 2 (3.3%) intraoperative complications, 19 (32.7%) 30-day postoperative complications to include 14 (24.1%) Clavien grade I, 4 (6.9%) Clavien grade II, 1 (1.7%) Clavien grade III and 0 Clavien grade IV complications. No statistical significance was found on multivariate or univariate analysis for survival analysis of time to recurrence and risk factors for complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest case series of primary R-RPLND for the treatment of low-stage non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). With 47 months of follow-up and a low rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, intermediate oncologic efficacy appears to be comparable to the gold standard open approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSGCT; RPLND; Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; Robotic surgery; Testicular cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31502033     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02900-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European perspective.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Walter Scheitlin; Axel Heidenreich; M Pilar Laguna; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Complications of primary nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: experience of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Peter Albers; Michael Hartmann; Sabine Kliesch; Kai-Uwe Kohrmann; Susanne Krege; Philipp Lossin; Lothar Weissbach
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Lymph Node Yield in Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Nonseminoma Germ Cell Tumors.

Authors:  Madhur Nayan; Michael A S Jewett; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Philippe L Bedard; Malcolm Moore; Peter Chung; Padraig Warde; Robert J Hamilton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Safety and Early Oncologic Effectiveness of Primary Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Cancer.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Shay Golan; Michael A Gorin; Amy N Luckenbaugh; Stephen B Williams; John F Ward; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Khaled S Hafez; Alon Z Weizer; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Pulmonary and cardiovascular toxicity in long-term testicular cancer survivors.

Authors:  Hege S Haugnes; Jan Oldenburg; Roy M Bremnes
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Midline Extraperitoneal Approach to Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer: Minimizing Surgical Morbidity.

Authors:  Sumeet Syan-Bhanvadia; Soroush T Bazargani; Thomas G Clifford; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Evaluation of lymph node counts in primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Brett S Carver; George J Bosl; Dean Bajorin; Robert Motzer; Darren Feldman; Victor E Reuter; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in low-stage testicular germ cell tumors: a detailed pathologic study with clinical outcome analysis with special emphasis on patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Brett S Carver; Angel M Cronin; Semra Olgac; Satish K Tickoo; Samson W Fine; Anuradha Gopalan; Jason Stasi; Farhang Rabbani; George J Bosl; Joel Sheinfeld; Victor E Reuter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: contemporary perioperative data.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; David W McDermott; Dock Winston; Eamonn Bahnson; Alexander M Berry; Graeme S Steele; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy in Testicular Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aggelos Tselos; Demetrios Moris; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Evangelos Fragkiadis; Eustratia Mpaili; Panagiotis Sakarellos; Michail Vailas; Kevin N Shah; Alexandros Papalampros
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.878

View more
  4 in total

1.  Primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection following orchiectomy for testicular germ cell tumors: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Andrew D Supron; Joseph G Cheaib; Michael J Biles; Zeyad Schwen; Mohamad Allaf; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

Review 2.  Robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma: the Princess Margaret Experience.

Authors:  G J Nason; Robert J Hamilton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer at a national referral centre.

Authors:  Anna Grenabo Bergdahl; Marianne Månsson; Göran Holmberg; Magnus Fovaeus
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Clinical outcome of robot-assisted residual mass resection in metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor.

Authors:  J L H Ruud Bosch; Joost M Blok; Henk G van der Poel; J Martijn Kerst; Axel Bex; Oscar R Brouwer; Simon Horenblas; Richard P Meijer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.