Literature DB >> 31502018

Diaphragmatic Peritoneal Stripping Versus Full-Thickness Resection in CRS/HIPEC: Is There a Difference?

Brianne J Sullivan1, Eliahu Y Bekhor2, Matthew Carpiniello2, Natasha L Leigh2, Eric R Pletcher2, Daniel Solomon2, Deepa R Magge2, Umut Sarpel2, Daniel M Labow2, Benjamin J Golas2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural recurrence after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is rare and poorly delineated. Specifically, data are limited on the effect that diaphragmatic peritoneal stripping versus full-thickness resection has on the nature of ipsilateral pleural recurrence and postoperative morbidity.
METHODS: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC were included from a prospectively maintained database. The patients were divided into three cohorts based on surgical management of the diaphragm as follows: diaphragm-stripping (DS) cohort, full-thickness resection (FTR) cohort, and no diaphragm manipulation (ND) cohort. Postoperative morbidity and incidence of ipsilateral pleural recurrence were evaluated. All diaphragmatic defects were closed before abdominal chemoperfusion.
RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 409 CRS/HIPEC procedures: 66 in DS, 122 in FTR, and 238 in ND. Ipsilateral pleural recurrence rates did not differ significantly between the three cohorts (DS 6%, FTR 3%, ND 3%; p = 0.470). Postoperative respiratory complications and overall morbidity were significantly greater for the patients who underwent diaphragmatic disruption (stripping and/or resection) than for the patients who did not (p ≤ 0.0001), but the two groups did not differ in terms of 30-day mortality. However, comparison of FTR with DS showed no impact on major morbidity or pleural recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Although patients undergoing surgical manipulation of the diaphragm during CRS/HIPEC experienced significantly greater morbidity, diaphragmatic stripping did not differ from full-thickness resection in terms of grades 3 and 4 complications or incidence of ipsilateral pleural recurrences. When deemed necessary to achieve complete cytoreduction, full-thickness diaphragmatic resection should be undertaken. In addition, the data support the observation that definitive repair of the diaphragmatic defect before abdominal chemoperfusion does not adversely influence ipsilateral pleural recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31502018     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07797-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Diaphragmatic Resection Often Is Needed in CRS/HIPEC But Does Not Increase Respiratory Complications.

Authors:  Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Andrea Craus-Miguel; Xavier González-Argenté; Rafael Morales-Soriano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Diaphragmatic Peritonectomy and Full-Thickness Resection in CRS/HIPEC May Allow Higher Completeness of Cytoreduction Rates with a Low Rate of Respiratory Complications.

Authors:  Andrea Craus-Miguel; Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Xavier González-Argenté; Rafael Morales-Soriano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Stapled Full-Thickness Diaphragm Resection: A Novel Approach to Diaphragmatic Resection in Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  David N Hanna; Cameron Schlegel; Muhammad O Ghani; Andrew Hermina; Alexander S Mina; Katlyn McKay; Christina E Bailey; Deepa Magge; Kamran Idrees
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.