Literature DB >> 31501954

Survival of the fittest: how myeloid-derived suppressor cells survive in the inhospitable tumor microenvironment.

Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg1,2,3, Daniel W Beury4, Katherine H Parker4, Lucas A Horn4.   

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are present in most cancer patients where they are significant contributors to the immune suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME is a hostile locale due to deficiencies in oxygen (hypoxia) and nutrients, and the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The survival of tumor cells within the TME is partially governed by two mechanisms: (1) Activation of the transcription factor Nuclear Factor Erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (Nrf2) which turns on genes that attenuate oxidative stress; and (2) The presence of High Mobility Group Box Protein-1 (HMGB1), a damage-associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP) that induces autophagy and protects against apoptosis. Because Nrf2 and HMGB1 promote tumor cell survival, we speculated that Nrf2 and HMGB1 may facilitate MDSC survival. We tested this hypothesis using Nrf2+/+ and Nrf2-/- BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice and pharmacological inhibitors of HMGB1. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that Nrf2 increased the suppressive potency and quantity of tumor-infiltrating MDSC by up-regulating MDSC production of H2O2 and decreasing MDSC apoptosis. Decreased apoptosis was accompanied by a decrease in the production of MDSC, demonstrating that MDSC levels are homeostatically regulated. Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy increased MDSC apoptosis, indicating that autophagy increases MDSC half-life. Inhibition of HMGB1 also increased MDSC apoptosis and reduced MDSC autophagy. These results combined with our previous findings that HMGB1 drives the accumulation of MDSC demonstrate that HMGB1 maintains MDSC viability by inducing autophagy. Collectively, these findings identify Nrf2 and HMGB1 as important factors that enable MDSC to survive in the TME.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autophagy; HMGB1; High mobility group box protein 1; Immune suppression; MDSC; Oxidative stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31501954      PMCID: PMC7004852          DOI: 10.1007/s00262-019-02388-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother        ISSN: 0340-7004            Impact factor:   6.968


  47 in total

1.  Therapy of glioblastoma multiforme improved by the antimutagenic chloroquine.

Authors:  Eduardo Briceño; Sandra Reyes; Julio Sotelo
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Transcriptional regulation of the antioxidant response element. Activation by Nrf2 and repression by MafK.

Authors:  T Nguyen; H C Huang; C B Pickett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements.

Authors:  K Itoh; T Chiba; S Takahashi; T Ishii; K Igarashi; Y Katoh; T Oyake; N Hayashi; K Satoh; I Hatayama; M Yamamoto; Y Nabeshima
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1997-07-18       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) activates an autophagic response to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Daolin Tang; Rui Kang; Kristen M Livesey; Herbert J Zeh; Michael T Lotze
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 8.401

5.  RNAi-mediated silencing of nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer inhibits tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anju Singh; Swetlana Boldin-Adamsky; Rajesh K Thimmulappa; Srikanta K Rath; Hagit Ashush; Jonathan Coulter; Amanda Blackford; Steven N Goodman; Fred Bunz; Walter H Watson; Edward Gabrielson; Elena Feinstein; Shyam Biswal
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Global mapping of binding sites for Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network analysis.

Authors:  Deepti Malhotra; Elodie Portales-Casamar; Anju Singh; Siddhartha Srivastava; David Arenillas; Christine Happel; Casper Shyr; Nobunao Wakabayashi; Thomas W Kensler; Wyeth W Wasserman; Shyam Biswal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Increased susceptibility of Nrf2 knockout mice to colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tin Oo Khor; Mou-Tuan Huang; Auemduan Prawan; Yue Liu; Xingpei Hao; Siwang Yu; William Ka Lung Cheung; Jefferson Y Chan; Bandaru S Reddy; Chung S Yang; Ah-Ng Kong
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-03-31

8.  Frontline Science: High fat diet and leptin promote tumor progression by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Authors:  Virginia K Clements; Tiha Long; Ramses Long; Chas Figley; Daniel M C Smith; Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 9.  Potential Applications of NRF2 Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Emiliano Panieri; Luciano Saso
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 10.  PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity.

Authors:  Daolin Tang; Rui Kang; Carolyn B Coyne; Herbert J Zeh; Michael T Lotze
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.988

View more
  18 in total

1.  Autocrine IL6-Mediated Activation of the STAT3-DNMT Axis Silences the TNFα-RIP1 Necroptosis Pathway to Sustain Survival and Accumulation of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells.

Authors:  Alyssa D Smith; Chunwan Lu; Daniela Payne; Amy V Paschall; John D Klement; Priscilla S Redd; Mohammed L Ibrahim; Dafeng Yang; Qimei Han; Zhuoqi Liu; Huidong Shi; Thomas J Hartney; Asha Nayak-Kapoor; Kebin Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Evaluation of autophagy mediators in myeloid-derived suppressor cells during human tuberculosis.

Authors:  Leigh A Kotze; Vinzeigh N Leukes; Zhuo Fang; Manfred B Lutz; Bryna L Fitzgerald; John Belisle; Andre G Loxton; Gerhard Walzl; Nelita du Plessis
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.178

Review 3.  Hypoxia as a Modulator of Inflammation and Immune Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Rosa A Castillo-Rodríguez; Cristina Trejo-Solís; Alfredo Cabrera-Cano; Saúl Gómez-Manzo; Víctor Manuel Dávila-Borja
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Polyamine Blocking Therapy Decreases Survival of Tumor-Infiltrating Immunosuppressive Myeloid Cells and Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of PD-1 Blockade.

Authors:  Eric T Alexander; Kelsey Mariner; Julia Donnelly; Otto Phanstiel; Susan K Gilmour
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  Asah2 Represses the p53-Hmox1 Axis to Protect Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells from Ferroptosis.

Authors:  Huabin Zhu; John D Klement; Chunwan Lu; Priscilla S Redd; Dafeng Yang; Alyssa D Smith; Dakota B Poschel; Juan Zou; Ding Liu; Peng George Wang; David Ostrov; Nicolas Coant; Yusuf A Hannun; Aaron H Colby; Mark W Grinstaff; Kebin Liu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Cargo-free immunomodulatory nanoparticles combined with anti-PD-1 antibody for treating metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Yining Zhang; Kevin R Hughes; Ravi M Raghani; Jeffrey Ma; Sophia Orbach; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Developmental pathways of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in neoplasia.

Authors:  Scott I Abrams
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.868

Review 8.  Potential Role of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs) in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).

Authors:  Anu Kauppinen; Kai Kaarniranta; Antero Salminen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Connections between Metabolism and Epigenetic Modification in MDSCs.

Authors:  Haiyan Dai; Huaxi Xu; Shengjun Wang; Jie Ma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  CD8+ T cells inhibit metastasis and CXCL4 regulates its function.

Authors:  Rama Soundararajan; Suhas Vasaikar; Robiya Joseph; Fei Yang; Kendra L Allton; Lin Tian; Petra den Hollander; Sevinj Isgandarova; Monika Haemmerle; Barbara Mino; Tieling Zhou; Crystal Shin; Melisa Martinez-Paniagua; Aysegul A Sahin; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Juri Gelovani; Jeffrey T Chang; Ghanashyam Acharya; Anil K Sood; Ignacio I Wistuba; Don L Gibbons; Luisa M Solis; Michelle C Barton; Navin Varadarajan; Jeffrey M Rosen; Xiang H Zhang; Sendurai A Mani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.