PURPOSE: An optimal diagnostic process in primary care is pivotal for reducing cancer-related disease burden. This study aims to explore reasons for long times to referral for Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in primary care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of anonymized free-text primary care records from the Julius General Practitioners' Network database, linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with a confirmed CRC diagnosis from 2007 through 2011 that symptomatically presented in primary care were included. Median time and interquartile ranges from presentation in primary care to referral were calculated for multiple patient and presentation characteristics. Associations of these characteristics with long time to referral (75th percentile was ≥59 days) were examined with log-binomial regression analyses. Routes to referral of patients with the longest times to referral were explored using thematic free-text analyses (90th percentile at ≥219 days). RESULTS: Among the 309 people with CRC, patients who were female, did not have a registered family history, had a history of malignancy, lacked alarm symptoms at presentation, or had hemorrhoids at physical examination were at risk for longer time to referral in univariable analyses (longer median durations and/or univariable association with the 75th percentile). Only presentation without alarm symptoms showed a statistically significant association with long duration (75th percentile) in multivariable analysis (relative risk = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). Thematic exploration of the diagnostic routes to referral of patients with the longest durations (90th percentile) showed 2 dominating themes: "alternative working diagnosis" and "suboptimal diagnostic strategies," and included the sub-themes "omitting to reconsider an initial diagnosis" and "lacking follow-up." CONCLUSIONS: Long time to referral for CRC in primary care is mainly related to low cancer suspicion. There is potential for reducing the longest times to referral for patients with CRC in primary care, with earlier reconsideration of the initial hypothesis and implementation of strict follow-up consultations.
PURPOSE: An optimal diagnostic process in primary care is pivotal for reducing cancer-related disease burden. This study aims to explore reasons for long times to referral for Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in primary care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of anonymized free-text primary care records from the Julius General Practitioners' Network database, linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with a confirmed CRC diagnosis from 2007 through 2011 that symptomatically presented in primary care were included. Median time and interquartile ranges from presentation in primary care to referral were calculated for multiple patient and presentation characteristics. Associations of these characteristics with long time to referral (75th percentile was ≥59 days) were examined with log-binomial regression analyses. Routes to referral of patients with the longest times to referral were explored using thematic free-text analyses (90th percentile at ≥219 days). RESULTS: Among the 309 people with CRC, patients who were female, did not have a registered family history, had a history of malignancy, lacked alarm symptoms at presentation, or had hemorrhoids at physical examination were at risk for longer time to referral in univariable analyses (longer median durations and/or univariable association with the 75th percentile). Only presentation without alarm symptoms showed a statistically significant association with long duration (75th percentile) in multivariable analysis (relative risk = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). Thematic exploration of the diagnostic routes to referral of patients with the longest durations (90th percentile) showed 2 dominating themes: "alternative working diagnosis" and "suboptimal diagnostic strategies," and included the sub-themes "omitting to reconsider an initial diagnosis" and "lacking follow-up." CONCLUSIONS: Long time to referral for CRC in primary care is mainly related to low cancer suspicion. There is potential for reducing the longest times to referral for patients with CRC in primary care, with earlier reconsideration of the initial hypothesis and implementation of strict follow-up consultations.
Authors: Daan Brandenbarg; Feikje Groenhof; Ilse M Siewers; Anna van der Voort; Fiona M Walter; Annette J Berendsen Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Camille Maringe; Sarah Walters; Bernard Rachet; John Butler; Tony Fields; Paul Finan; Roy Maxwell; Bjørn Nedrebø; Lars Påhlman; Annika Sjövall; Allan Spigelman; Gerda Engholm; Anna Gavin; Marianne L Gjerstorff; Juanita Hatcher; Tom B Johannesen; Eva Morris; Colleen E McGahan; Elizabeth Tracey; Donna Turner; Michael A Richards; Michel P Coleman Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: D Weller; P Vedsted; G Rubin; F M Walter; J Emery; S Scott; C Campbell; R S Andersen; W Hamilton; F Olesen; P Rose; S Nafees; E van Rijswijk; S Hiom; C Muth; M Beyer; R D Neal Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: M L Tørring; P Murchie; W Hamilton; P Vedsted; M Esteva; M Lautrup; M Winget; G Rubin Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sjoerd G Elias; Liselotte Kok; Niek J de Wit; Ben J M Witteman; Jelle G Goedhard; Mariëlle J L Romberg-Camps; Jean W M Muris; Karel G M Moons Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Victoria Hardy; Adelaide Yue; Stephanie Archer; Samuel William David Merriel; Matthew Thompson; Jon Emery; Juliet Usher-Smith; Fiona M Walter Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Matthew Castelo; Colin Sue-Chue-Lam; Lawrence Paszat; Teruko Kishibe; Adena S Scheer; Bettina E Hansen; Nancy N Baxter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Josephina G Kuiper; Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel; Valery E P P Lemmens; Ernst J Kuipers; Ron M C Herings Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 2.497