Literature DB >> 31500998

Using machine learning to explain the heterogeneity of schizophrenia. Realizing the promise and avoiding the hype.

Neeraj Tandon1, Rajiv Tandon2.   

Abstract

Despite extensive research and prodigious advances in neuroscience, our comprehension of the nature of schizophrenia remains rudimentary. Our failure to make progress is attributed to the extreme heterogeneity of this condition, enormous complexity of the human brain, limitations of extant research paradigms, and inadequacy of traditional statistical methods to integrate or interpret increasingly large amounts of multidimensional information relevant to unravelling brain function. Fortunately, the rapidly developing science of machine learning appears to provide tools capable of addressing each of these impediments. Enthusiasm about the potential of machine learning methods to break the current impasse is reflected in the steep increase in the number of scientific publication about the application of machine learning to the study of schizophrenia. Machine learning approaches are, however, poorly understood by schizophrenia researchers and clinicians alike. In this paper, we provide a simple description of the nature and techniques of machine learning and their application to the study of schizophrenia. We then summarize its potential and constraints with illustrations from six studies of machine learning in schizophrenia and address some common misconceptions about machine learning. We suggest some guidelines for researchers, readers, science editors and reviewers of the burgeoning machine learning literature in schizophrenia. In order to realize its enormous promise, we suggest the need for the disciplined application of machine learning methods to the study of schizophrenia with a clear recognition of its capability and challenges accompanied by a concurrent effort to improve machine learning literacy among neuroscientists and mental health professionals.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  -omics; Big data; Computational psychiatry; Hype; Machine learning; Methods; Neuroscience; Promise; Research; Schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31500998     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  3 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence-based classification of schizophrenia: A high density electroencephalographic and support vector machine study.

Authors:  Sai Krishna Tikka; Bikesh Kumar Singh; S Haque Nizamie; Shobit Garg; Sunandan Mandal; Kavita Thakur; Lokesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  Resting state alpha oscillatory activity is a valid and reliable marker of schizotypy.

Authors:  Jelena Trajkovic; Francesco Di Gregorio; Francesca Ferri; Chiara Marzi; Stefano Diciotti; Vincenzo Romei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  AI ethics in computational psychiatry: From the neuroscience of consciousness to the ethics of consciousness.

Authors:  Wanja Wiese; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.