| Literature DB >> 31500577 |
Hyeong Dong Yuk1, Chang Wook Jeong2, Cheol Kwak2, Hyeon Hoe Kim2, Kyung Chul Moon3, Ja Hyeon Ku4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical efficacy and prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer according to the basal/squamous-like (BASQ) classification system based on immunohistochemical staining [CK5/6(+), CK14(+), GATA3(-), and FOXA1(-)].Entities:
Keywords: Basal cell; Immunohistochemistry; Molecular subtype; Neoplasm metastasis; Squamous cell; Urinary bladder neoplasms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31500577 PMCID: PMC6734465 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6042-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Basic patient characteristics
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) (year) | 65.1 ± 11.2 |
| BMI (m2/kg) | 23.56 ± 5.93 |
| Gender | |
| Female | 17 (17.0%) |
| Male | 83 (83.0%) |
| ASA | |
| 1 | 34 (34.0%) |
| 2 | 57 (57.0%) |
| ≥ 3 | 9 (9.0%) |
| pT stage | |
| T2 | 50 (50.0%) |
| T3 | 42 (42.0%) |
| T4 | 8 (8.0%) |
| LVI | 42 (42.0%) |
| CIS | 34 (34.0%) |
| N stage | |
| N0 | 80 (80.0%) |
| N1 | 7 (7.0%) |
| N2 | 8 (8.0%) |
| N3 | 5 (5.0%) |
| LND range | |
| Standard | 36 (36.0%) |
| Extend | 64 (64.0%) |
| Removed LN | 14.1 ± 12.9 |
| Positive LN | 1.0 ± 2.8 |
| Recurrence | 31 (31.0%) |
| Mortality | 59 (59.0%) |
| Cancer related mortality | 32 (32.0%) |
BMI Body mass index, LVI Lymphovascular invasion, CIS Carcinoma in situ, LND Lymph node dissection, LN Lymph node;
Multivariable Cox regression analysis of overall survival, cancer specific survival, recurrence free survival
| Parameter | Overall survival | Cancer specific survival | Recurrence free survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||
| pT stage | ||||||
| T2 | reference | reference | Reference | |||
| ≥ T3 | 1.46 (1.15–1.85) | 0.002 | 1.49 (1.17–1.90) | 0.001 | 2.04 (0.38–10.74) | 0.400 |
| LVI | 0.86 (0.25–2.93) | 0.806 | 2.33 (0.44–12.16) | 0.316 | 2.66 (0.97–7.65) | 0.060 |
| CIS | 0.90 (0.28–2.89) | 0.858 | 4.15 (1.21–16.03)) | 0.028 | 0.70 (0.43–1.14) | 0.160 |
| N stage | 0.478 | 0.096 | 0.096 | |||
| N0 | reference | Reference | reference | |||
| ≥ N1 | 1.71 (1.46–1.99) | < 0.001 | 1.75 (1.62–1.91) | 0.004 | 2.96 (1.40–6.22) | 0.004 |
| CK5/6 | 3.30 (0.81–14.63) | 0.101 | 2.57 (0.90–8.16) | 0.088 | 3.15 (0.8–12.63) | 0.104 |
| CK14 | 6.16 (1.28–38.30) | 0.033 | 3.96 (1.13–16.36) | 0.040 | 3.19 (1.07–9.55) | 0.037 |
| GATA3 | 0.77 (0.37–1.58) | 0.477 | 0.81 (0.22–2.89) | 0.742 | 0.29 (0.01–5.27) | 0.409 |
| FOXA1 | 0.08 (0.01–0.59) | 0.023 | 0.08 (0.01–0.61) | 0.024 | 0.12 (0.1–1.51) | 0.103 |
HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval, LVI Lymphovascular invasion, CIS Carcinoma in situ, LND Lymph node dissection, LN Lymph node, UC Urothelial carcinoma
Fig. 1Positive immunohistochemical staining of CK5/6 (a), CK14 (b), GATA3 (c), and FOXA1 (d). CK5/6, CK14 showed membranous staining, and GATA3, FOXA1 revealed nuclear positivity
Fig. 2Oncologic outcomes according to subtypes of urothelial carcinoma. a overall survival, b cancer specific survival, c recurrence free survival
Immunohistochemistry results
| CK14 | CK5/6 | GATA3 | FOXA1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1% | 60 (60.0%) | 24 (24.0%) | 8 (8.0%) | 15 (15.0%) |
| 1~10% | 12 (12.0%) | 35 (35.0%) | 11 (11.0%) | 15 (15.0%) |
| 11~25% | 15 (15.0%) | 16 (16.0%) | 14 (14.0%) | 20 (20.0%) |
| > 25% | 13 (13.0%) | 25 (25.0%) | 67 (67.0%) | 50 (50.0%) |
Fig. 3Comparison of oncologic outcome according to expression level of subtypes of urothelial carcinoma. a Overall survival, b Cancer specific survival, c Recurrence free survival
Fig. 4Oncologic outcomes according to ck5/6(+) and gata3(−) and ck5/6(+) and foxa1(−) in immunochemical staining. a Overall survival, b Cancer specific survival, c Recurrence free survival