Literature DB >> 31499156

Second primary melanomas in a cohort of 977 melanoma patients within the first 5 years of monitoring.

Aimilios Lallas1, Zoe Apalla2, Athanassios Kyrgidis3, Chryssoula Papageorgiou4, Ioannis Boukovinas5, Mattheos Bobos6, George Efthimiopoulos7, Christina Nikolaidou8, Andreas Moutsoudis4, Theodosia Gkentsidi4, Konstantinos Lallas4, Elizabeth Lazaridou9, Elena Sotiriou4, Efstratios Vakirlis4, Dimitrios Ioannides4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In retrospective studies, a second primary melanoma (SPM) develops in 2%-20% of melanoma patients. Scarce evidence exists on the usefulness of total-body photography (TBP) and digital dermatoscopic documentation (DDD) for detecting SPMs.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to quantify the risk and investigate the time of occurrence of SPMs. Secondary aims were to identify risk factors for SPM and to assess the usefulness of TBP and DDD for SPM detection.
METHODS: This prospective cohort included patients with recently diagnosed melanoma that underwent sequential clinical and dermatoscopic examinations for up to 5 years. Life table analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. Multivariate Cox models were constructed to identify factors affecting the outcome.
RESULTS: An SPM developed in 46 of 977 (4.7%) patients. Life table analysis revealed a 5-year cumulative risk of 8.0% for SPM. High nevus count, fair phototype, and occupational sun exposure were potent predictors of SPM. Of all new melanomas, 17.3% were diagnosed by clinical and dermatoscopic examination, 48.1% by TBP, and 34.6% by DDD. LIMITATIONS: All patients followed the same protocol and diagnostic bias associated with sequential dermatoscopic imaging.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort, melanoma patients were at 8% risk of an SPM developing within 5 years. TBP and DDD significantly contributed to the early detection of SPM.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dermoscopy; digital dermoscopy; melanoma; nevus count; phototype; risk factors; second primary melanoma; total-body photography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31499156     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  3 in total

1.  Incidence of Second Primary Melanoma in Cutaneous Melanoma Survivors.

Authors:  Alyssa A Wiener; Jessica R Schumacher; Jennifer M Racz; Sharon M Weber; Yaohui G Xu; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  SEOM clinical guideline for the management of cutaneous melanoma (2020).

Authors:  M Majem; J L Manzano; I Marquez-Rodas; K Mujika; E Muñoz-Couselo; E Pérez-Ruiz; L de la Cruz-Merino; E Espinosa; M Gonzalez-Cao; A Berrocal
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Canadian Melanoma Conference Recommendations on High-Risk Melanoma Surveillance: A Report from the 14th Annual Canadian Melanoma Conference; Banff, Alberta; 20-22 February 2020.

Authors:  Christina W Lee; J Gregory McKinnon; Noelle Davis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.