Literature DB >> 31498379

Association of a School-Based, Asthma-Focused Telehealth Program With Emergency Department Visits Among Children Enrolled in South Carolina Medicaid.

John Bian1, Kathryn K Cristaldi2, Andrea P Summer2, Zemin Su1, Justin Marsden2, Patrick D Mauldin1, James T McElligott2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Telehealth may improve access to care for populations in rural communities. However, little is known about the effectiveness of telehealth programs designed for children.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of a school-based telehealth program in Williamsburg county (South Carolina) with all-cause emergency department (ED) visits made by children enrolled in Medicaid. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This Medicaid claims data analysis was conducted in Williamsburg county and 4 surrounding counties in South Carolina and included children aged 3 to 17 years who were enrolled in Medicaid and living in any of the 5 counties from January 2012 to December 2017. Williamsburg served as the intervention and the 4 surrounding counties without a telehealth program as the control; 2012 to 2014 was designated as the preintervention period, whereas 2015 to 2017 served as the postintervention period. The study was designed with a difference-in-differences specification, in which the unit-of-analysis was a child-month, and a subsample included children with asthma. The data analysis was performed from July 2018 to February 2019. EXPOSURES: The school-based telehealth program implemented in Williamsburg county in 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The binary outcome was the status of at least 1 all-cause ED visit by a child in a given month.
RESULTS: The full sample included 2 443 405 child-months from 23 198 children in Williamsburg county and 213 164 children in the control counties. The mean (SD) proportions of monthly ED visits in Williamsburg were 3.65% (0.10%) during the preintervention and 3.87% (0.11%) during the postintervention. The corresponding proportions of the 4 control counties were 3.37% preintervention (0.04%), and 3.56% postintervention (0.04%), respectively. The trends in the proportion were paralleled. In the asthma subsample, the proportions in Williamsburg were 3.16% (0.31%) during the preintervention and 3.38% (0.34%) during the postintervention, respectively. The proportions for the control counties were 3.02% preintervention (0.10%) and 3.90% postintervention (0.11%), respectively. There was an interaction of the proportions between the pre/postintervention period and the intervention/control counties in this subsample. The regression analysis of the full sample showed no association of the telehealth program with ED visits. The additional analysis of the asthma subsample showed that this program was associated with a reduction of 0.66 (95% CI, -1.16 to -0.17; P < .01) percentage point per 100 children per month in ED visits, representing an approximately 21% relative decrease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although we found no association of this program with the ED visits of the overall studied population, this study suggests that telehealth with a focus on chronic pediatric diseases, such as asthma, may deliver substantial health benefits to rural and medically underserved communities.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31498379      PMCID: PMC6735423          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  7 in total

1.  Error in Table 2.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  A multilevel perspective on goals, barriers, and facilitators of school-based asthma management.

Authors:  Jennifer R Mammen; Colleen M McGovern; Judith D Schoonmaker; Ashley Philibert; Emma C Schlegel; Kimberly Arcoleo
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2021-12-28

3.  Remote intervention engagement and outcomes in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children consortium multisite trial.

Authors:  Sarah Duncan-Park; Claire Dunphy; Jacqueline Becker; Christine D'Urso; Rachel Annunziato; Joshua Blatter; Carol Conrad; Samuel B Goldfarb; Don Hayes; Ernestina Melicoff; Marc Schecter; Gary Visner; Brian Armstrong; Hyunsook Chin; Karen Kesler; Nikki M Williams; Jonah N Odim; Stuart C Sweet; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Eyal Shemesh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Potential Utility of School-Based Telehealth in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Stormee Williams; Luyu Xie; Kristina Hill; Matthew Sunil Mathew; Tamara Perry; Danielle Wesley; Sarah E Messiah
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.118

5.  Nurse Perspectives Regarding Implementation of an Asthma Monitoring Mobile Health Application in the School Setting.

Authors:  Emily E Johnson; Claire MacGeorge; Annie Andrews; Kathryn L King; Ronald J Teufel; Daniel L Brinton; Ryan Kruis; Kathryn C Hale; Dee Ford; Kathryn R Sterba
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Do Not Give Up Your Stethoscopes Yet-Telemedicine for Chronic Respiratory Diseases in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephen Simeone; Daniel Condit; Evan Nadler
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 7.  Using Telemedicine to Care for the Asthma Patient.

Authors:  Yudy K Persaud
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.