Literature DB >> 31498220

The Reliability of Potential Fatigue-Monitoring Measures in Elite Youth Soccer Players.

John F Fitzpatrick1,2, Kirsty M Hicks1, Mark Russell3, Philip R Hayes1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Fitzpatrick, JF, Hicks, KM, Russell, M, and Hayes, PR. The reliability of potential fatigue-monitoring measures in elite youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3448-3452, 2021-Monitoring fatigue is of vital importance to practitioners; however, logistics and concerns about reliability may impede the use of certain measures. This study aimed to quantify the reliability of potential measures of fatigue; a subjective wellness questionnaire, jump performance tests, and tri-axial accelerometer variables derived during submaximal shuttle running in elite youth soccer players. A secondary aim was to establish the minimum test duration that could be used for the submaximal shuttle run while maintaining good reliability. Seventeen male youth team players (age: 17.4 ± 0.5 years) were assessed on 2 occasions, spaced 7 days apart. Typical error, coefficient of variation (CV%), interclass correlation (ICC), and minimum detectable change were calculated for a subjective wellness questionnaire, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ) and drop jump contact time (DJ-CT), drop jump height (DJ-JH), and reactive strength (DJ-RSI). A novel submaximal shuttle running test was also used to assess tri-axial accelerometer data reliability. Results suggest that CMJ, SJ, DJ-CT, and DJ-RSI have good test-retest reliability (CV% = 4.5-7.7; ICC = 0.80-0.88); however DJ-JH did not show acceptable reliability (CV% = 6.0; ICC = 0.76). Good reliability was found for all tri-axial accelerometer variables during a 3-minute (2-minute analysis) submaximal shuttle run (CV% = 2.4-8.0; ICC = 0.81-0.95), except for % PlayerLoad anterior-posterior (%PLAP) (CV% = 7.2; ICC = 0.63). The subjective wellness questionnaire demonstrated poor reliability for all items (CV% = 11.2-30.0; ICC = 0.00-0.78). The findings from this study provide practitioners with valuable information about the reliability of a range of potential fatigue-monitoring measures. This can be used to help make accurate decisions about the magnitude of change in these assessments when used in practice.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31498220     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

Review 1.  Submaximal Fitness Tests in Team Sports: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Physiological State.

Authors:  Tzlil Shushan; Shaun J McLaren; Martin Buchheit; Tannath J Scott; Steve Barrett; Ric Lovell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  The Reliability of Neuromuscular and Perceptual Measures Used to Profile Recovery, and the Time-Course of such Responses following Academy Rugby League Match-Play.

Authors:  Hendrickus G J Aben; Samuel P Hills; Darren Higgins; Carlton B Cooke; Danielle Davis; Ben Jones; Mark Russell
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22

3.  Weekly Load Variations of Distance-Based Variables in Professional Soccer Players: A Full-Season Study.

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Rui Silva; Daniel Castillo; Asier Los Arcos; Bruno Mendes; José Afonso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Trends Assessing Neuromuscular Fatigue in Team Sports: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Claudia Alba-Jiménez; Daniel Moreno-Doutres; Javier Peña
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.