Literature DB >> 31497982

Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.

Martin Schnuerch1, Edgar Erdfelder1.   

Abstract

For several years, the public debate in psychological science has been dominated by what is referred to as the reproducibility crisis. This crisis has, inter alia, drawn attention to the need for proper control of statistical decision errors in testing psychological hypotheses. However, conventional methods of error probability control often require fairly large samples. Sequential statistical tests provide an attractive alternative: They can be applied repeatedly during the sampling process and terminate whenever there is sufficient evidence in the data for one of the hypotheses of interest. Thus, sequential tests may substantially reduce the required sample size without compromising predefined error probabilities. Herein, we discuss the most efficient sequential design, the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT), and show how it is easily implemented for a 2-sample t test using standard statistical software. We demonstrate, by means of simulations, that the SPRT not only reliably controls error probabilities but also typically requires substantially smaller samples than standard t tests and other common sequential designs. Moreover, we investigate the robustness of the SPRT against violations of its assumptions. Finally, we illustrate the sequential t test by applying it to an empirical example and provide recommendations on how psychologists can employ it in their own research to benefit from its desirable properties. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31497982     DOI: 10.1037/met0000234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  3 in total

1.  Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor test.

Authors:  Angelika M Stefan; Felix D Schönbrodt; Nathan J Evans; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.

Authors:  Sandipan Pramanik; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2022-04-14

3.  Informed Bayesian survival analysis.

Authors:  František Bartoš; Frederik Aust; Julia M Haaf
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 4.612

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.