| Literature DB >> 31497501 |
Tim Rolvien1,2, Matthias Krause1,3, Jozef Zustin1,4, Oleg Yastrebov5, Ralf Oheim1, Florian Barvencik1, Karl-Heinz Frosch3, Michael Amling1.
Abstract
Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a benign bone tumor producing non-mineralized bone matrix (i.e., osteoid). While peritumoral edema is commonly found in OO, extensive bone marrow edema has been reported less frequently. Furthermore, the micro-morphological characteristics of the nidus and its central calcification remain unclear. In this study, a consecutive series of four patients suffering from extensive bone marrow edema triggered by intra-articular osteoid osteoma underwent clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) as well as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and laboratory bone turnover analyses. The obtained resection specimens were processed by undecalcified histology and were subsequently analyzed by light microscopy and quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI). We report an entity of intra-articular osteoid osteoma in the knee and foot, in which an extensive and persistent bone marrow edema syndrome masked the correct diagnosis. While metabolic bone diseases were excluded in all cases, the reassessment of the patients' clinical history including pain characteristics (nocturnal, aspirin sensitivity) led us to perform additional CT, where the tumor was diagnosed. The micro-morphological analysis of the OO biopsies revealed that the nidus was surrounded by hyperosteoidosis, while central mineralization was detected in all cases. This mineralized area showed a significantly higher mineralization heterogeneity than the surrounding trabecular bone and more disorganized collagen fibers detected by qBEI and polarized light microscopy, respectively. Taken together, our results indicate that osteoid osteoma should be considered when persistent and extensive, peri-articular bone marrow edema is diagnosed. The central calcification that is found inside the nidus in conventional imaging was mirrored by bone matrix with a heterogeneous mineralization pattern.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow edema; Bone tumor; Joint pain; MRI; Osteoid osteoma; qBEI
Year: 2019 PMID: 31497501 PMCID: PMC6722254 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bone Oncol ISSN: 2212-1366 Impact factor: 4.072
Fig. 1Extensive bone marrow edema as a presentation of intra-articular osteoid osteoma in different joints. (A) Coronal proton density MRI sequence showing the bone marrow edema of the lateral femur condyle (green arrow) in Case 1 and subsequent CT scan unmasking a nidus (red arrow). Right lower corner: Nidus diameter. (B) Identification of the nidus at MRI re-examination. Coronal proton density fat-saturated MRI sequence. (C) Extensive bone marrow edema of the lateral femur condyle (green arrow) in Case 2 and CT scan showing a small nidus (red arrow). (D) Coronal and sagittal T2-weighted fat-saturated MRI sequence. (E) Extensive bone marrow edema of the calcaneus (green arrow) in Case 3 and nidus seen in coronal CT reformat (Red arrow). (F) Coronal and axial T2-weighted fat-saturated MRI sequence with suspect of a nidus. (G) Sagittal proton density MRI sequence showing the persistent bone marrow edema (green arrow) and joint effusion in Case 4. CT revealed a subchondral nidus pointing to osteoid osteoma (red arrow). Red arrows indicate the nidus. (H) Sagittal proton density fat-saturated MRI sequence. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Laboratory values and DXA Z-scores in the lumbar spine and hip assessed by DXA.
| Parameter | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Reference range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca (mmol/l) | 2.26 | 2.45 | 2.27 | 2.35 | 2.13–2.63 |
| AP (U/l) | 68 | 51 | 78 | 53 | 40–129 |
| TSH (mU/l) | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.06 | 0.69 | 0.27–4.20 |
| Gastrin (ng/l) | 65 | 32 | 12 (-) | 34 | 13–115 |
| 25-OH-D3 (µg/l) | 37.9 | 19.1 (-) | 15.0 (-) | 23.7 (-) | >30 |
| PTH (ng/l) | 42.8 | 15.3 (-) | 50.5 | 26.7 | 17–84 |
| BAP (µg/l) | 8.8 | 9.3 | 17.2 | 9.7 | 5.5–22.9 |
| Osteocalcin (µg/l) | 16.7 | 17.9 | 20.8 | 23.1 | 12–52.1 |
| DPD (nmol/mmol) | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2–5 |
| DXA Z-score LS | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | −0.5 | (−1)–(+1) |
| DXA Z-score hip | −0.2 | 0.5 | −2.2 | −0.8 | (−1)–(+1) |
Ca: calcium, AP: alkaline phosphatase, TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone, 25-OH-D3: 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, PTH: parathyroid hormone, BAP: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. DPD: deoxypyridinoline. (-) indicates low levels.
Fig. 2Postoperative imaging confirming successful resection. (A) Postoperative coronal CT reformat in Case 1 confirming successful resection. (B) Postoperative axial CT reformat in Case 2. (C) Postoperative lateral radiograph in Case 3. (D) Postoperative coronal CT reformat in Case 4.
Fig. 3Histological findings. (A) Macroscopic photograph of the core biopsy of Case 2. (B) Corresponding contact radiography in which the nidus can readily be determined. (C) Overview of an undecalcified processed resection specimen reveals subchondral hyperosteoidosis. Von Kossa staining. (D) Intertrabecular fatty bone marrow with moderate edema surrounding the fat cells (FC.) and artery (top). (E) Immature sclerotic woven bone with osteoid and resorption lacunae with increased osteoclast indices (asterisks). (F) Area of trabecular bone next to the tumor showing active bone remodeling. Osteoblasts (arrow), osteoclasts (asterisk) and osteoid (O.). (G) Interface between the calcified nidus (CN.) and the surrounding osteoid mass (O.), Osteoclasts (asterisk). Toluidine blue or trichrome Masson–Goldner staining. (H) Polarized light microscopy indicating the disorganized collagen alignment within the calcified nidus.
Fig. 4Bone mineral density distribution of the calcified nidus assessed by quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI). (A) Exemplary image of the analyzed area (Case 2). Insets: trabecular bone (Tb. Bone, top) and calcified nidus (CN, bottom). (B,C) qBEI analysis revealed calcified nidus areas of different sizes (B) Case 3, (C) Case 4. (D) BMDD curves showing significantly higher mineralization heterogeneity (CaWidth) and equal mean mineralization values (CaMean) for the calcified nidus compared to the adjacent trabecular bone. (E) Correlation analysis of nidus diameter and nidus calcification diameter via CT, and (F) calcification diameter via CT and calcification diameter via qBEI. *p < 0.05.