The chance of a live birth after assisted reproduction in women with thyroid disorders.

PURPOSE: Women with thyroid disorders may have increased infertility and poor reproductive outcomes, but it is unclear if assisted reproductive technology (ART) is effective in this population. The aim of this study was to examine the chance of a pregnancy (biochemical and clinical), and a live birth after ART, in women with thyroid disorders undergoing ART treatment, compared to women without thyroid disorders. Among live-born children, we assessed the risk of congenital malformations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a nationwide cohort study of all women undergoing ART treatments in Denmark from 1 January 1994 throughout June 2017, we calculated the chance of a pregnancy and a live birth after embryo transfer. Women with thyroid disorders were stratified into two groups: those diagnosed with hypothyroid or hyperthyroid disorders. The adjusted OR (aOR) of a biochemical and a clinical pregnancy, a live born child and a congenital malformation was computed using multilevel logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In total, 199,674 embryo transfers were included in 2,101 women with thyroid disorders and in 65,526 women without thyroid disorders. The chance of a biochemical pregnancy was significantly reduced in women with hyperthyroidism (aOR=0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93), and the aOR of a live birth was 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98. The aOR for a live birth in women with hypothyroidism was 1.03 (95% CI 0.94-1.12). Children of women with hypothyroidism, who were conceived after ART treatment, had a significantly increased risk of any congenital malformation (aOR=1.46 [95% CI 1.07-2.00]).
CONCLUSION: Women with hyperthyroidism receiving ART treatment had a decreased chance of a live birth per embryo transfer compared to women without thyroid disorders. Women with hypothyroidism did not have a decreased chance of a live birth but their offspring had an increased risk of congenital malformation.

Introduction

Thyroid disorders are prevalent conditions in women of reproductive age1–4 and may affect female fertility in various ways, including anovulatory cycles, luteal phase defect, high prolactin levels, and sex hormone imbalances,5–7 which may cause both infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes.8–12 Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment is a relevant intervention in women who cannot conceive naturally, and recent studies have shown that women with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and rheumatoid arthritis have a decreased chance of giving birth to a live-born child after ART treatment compared to other women undergoing ART treatment.13–15 All of these diseases share an autoimmune etiology. Thyroid disorders may also be autoimmune but the efficacy of ART treatment in women with thyroid disorders has never been investigated in a large cohort study. The main aim of our study was therefore to investigate ART outcomes in women with thyroid disorders , including hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.

Infertility is the failure to achieve a successful pregnancy after 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse.16 In general, up to 10–16% of all women suffer from infertility and many of them seek ART treatment,17–19 which includes in vitro fertilization (IVF), with or without fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and transfer of fresh, frozen-thawed (FER) embryos and vitrified-warmed blastocyst replacement (WBR), respectively. The impact of subclinical hypothyroidism, thyroid autoimmunity, and the medical treatment of thyroid disorders on the ART efficacy have been studied according to outcomes, such as miscarriage, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates.16,20–29 A recent review from Busnelli et al further concludes that the presence of thyroid antibodies may have a detrimental effect on the course of a pregnancy determining an increased risk of miscarriage and a decreased chance of a live birth, but that age for instance may have impact on this.27 The efficacy of ART treatment in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism in terms of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth has never been studied based on nationwide data. We aimed to examine the efficacy of ART treatment in women diagnosed with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism prior to ART treatment, compared to women without thyroid disorders using the Danish nationwide registers. The outcome was biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. An association between female thyroid disorders and the risk of congenital malformation (CM) in the offspring has been described earlier, either as a consequence of the underlying maternal thyroid dysfunction or a teratogenic effect.4,30–32 No previous studies have examined if this is also the case if the pregnancy is ART induced, and we therefore aimed to estimate the risk of any CM in the live-born offspring.

Materials and methods

Setting and the study population

Data were obtained from the following nationwide Danish registries: 1) data on diagnoses in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, and comorbidity from the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR), 2) data related to ART treatments, including the cause of infertility, and furthermore information on the achievement of a biochemical and clinical pregnancy were extracted from the Danish ART register, 3) data on the outcomes of live birth and CMs from the ART register and the Danish Medical Birth Register (DMBR); and 4) civil registration number from the Civil Registration System (CRS), including vital status, emigration, and immigration. Data from all sources were linked at a personal level using the unique 10-digit civil registration number assigned at all Danish residents at birth or immigration from the CRS and used in all Danish health care registries and as linkage between registries. All data were encrypted so that no individuals could be identified by the researchers.

The Danish population is approximately 5.6 million inhabitants. The study population comprised all women with a valid civil registration number who were available for follow-up, initiating ART treatment with at least one embryo transfer during the study period of 1 January 1994–30 June 2017. In Denmark, all infertile couples and single women are offered up to three free fully reimbursed fresh fertility treatment attempts as long as the woman is younger than 41 years of age at the time of the referral to ART treatment. All ART-related treatment cycles are recorded in the Danish ART register. The register was established on 1 January 1994 and includes data on ART treatments from both public and private clinics33,34 and registration of all procedures and treatments is mandatory. In this study, ART refers to traditional IVF, ICSI, and FER/WBR.

The exposed cohorts

From the study population of all women receiving ART treatment during the study period, we identified all women with the diagnoses hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism in the DNPR. The DNPR includes records of all patients discharged from Danish hospitals since 1977 and all outpatient visits since 1994.35,36 Information in the DNPR includes hospital, dates of admission, discharge, procedures, and diagnoses based on the ICD-8 (before 1994 and ICD-10 thereafter, the ICD-9 classification was never used in Denmark), and civil registration numbers. All eligible patients who had a discharge history, or outpatient visit, of hyperthyroidism from any hospital in Denmark (ICD-8 codes: 242.00–242.29; ICD-10 codes: E05-E05.9 [except E05.4, E05.8A, and E05.9A]) before the date of embryo transfer, were identified.37,38 Similarly, all eligible patients, who had a discharge history of hypothyroidism from any hospital in Denmark (ICD-8 codes: 243.99, 244–244.09 [except 244.02]; ICD-10 codes: E03-E03.9 [except E03.0A, E03.1B, and E03.4], E89.0) before the date of embryo transfer, were identified.37,38 Women registered with diagnoses in both categories (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) were excluded from the analyses (468 transfers in 164 patients). For the outcomes biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth, the exposed cohorts comprised all ART treatment cycles in women with hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, respectively. Since each woman could have several ART treatments, the observation unit was the embryo transfer.39–41 According to the outcome of CM, each woman with hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism could have had several childbirths during the study period and the observational unit for examining the risk of CMs was the live-born child.

The unexposed cohort

For the outcomes of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth, the unexposed cohort comprised all embryo transfers in women without diagnoses of hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism before the date of embryo transfer. For the outcome CMs, the unexposed cohort comprised all live-born children in the population of women without hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism.

Outcomes

The outcome for the exposed and unexposed cohorts was live birth within a period of 140–308 days after the date of embryo transfer. We retrieved information regarding live birth after ART treatment from the DMBR. The DMBR includes information on all births in Denmark since 1 January 1973 and also includes information on the mother, the child, birth-related information, and diagnoses of CMs (from 2006).42–44 A live birth was thus considered to be the result of the particular ART treatment if the difference between embryo transfer and birth was 20–44 weeks (corresponding to 140–308 days)13,39 from the last menstruation start. The outcome biochemical pregnancy was based on information from the ART register by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measurement at 14–16 days after embryo transfer, and a clinical pregnancy was based on ultrasound examination approximately 7–8 weeks after embryo transfer. Complete information on clinical pregnancies, in terms of positive ultrasound examination, was available in the register from 2006. The outcome of any CM diagnosed within 1 year afterbirth was based on information from the DMBR (for CM diagnoses please refer to supplemental).

Data on confounders

The covariates included in the statistical analyses were selected a priori. From the DNPR we obtained data on comorbid diseases prior to each embryo transfer for all women in the study population and a comorbidity index score, the Charlson comorbidity index score, covering 19 major disease categories, weighted according to their prognostic impact, was conducted.45 Charlson comorbidity index is a validated tool to adjust case-mix and the most often used measurement for comorbidity in register-based studies. The overall positive predictive values for the 19 Charlson conditions were consistently high with 98.0% in a Danish validation study.46 The scores were calculated for each embryo transfer of each woman in two index levels: no comorbidity (Charlson index 0) and some comorbidity (Charlson index ≥1). Information on parity was obtained in two categories (0, 1+) and smoking in two categories (yes/no).

For the entire study period we had data on the woman’s age at the time of embryo transfer (continuous variable), calendar year of the ART treatment in four periods (1994–1999, 2000–2005, 2006–2011, and 2012–2017), type of treatment (IVF, ICSI, FER/WBR), and the cause of infertility (female factor, male factor, combined female/male factor, and idiopathic infertility). From 2006, the ART register also contained information on the BMI in four categories corresponding to the WHO classification: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2),47 partners age, and alcohol intake at the time of embryo transfer in two categories (yes/no).

Statistical analyses

Contingency tables were constructed for the main study variables according to the two exposed cohorts, and the unexposed cohort. We used multilevel logistic regression analyses to compute the crude and the adjusted relative risk estimates as ORs with 95% CIs for a biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live births following ART treatments in women with hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism relative to women without thyroid disorders. The model accounted for multiple embryo transfers in the same woman. Adjustments were made for Charlson comorbidity index, the women’s age at the time of embryo transfer, calendar year of the ART treatment, the type of infertility treatment, and the cause of infertility. In an extended regression model, including data from 2006 and onwards, we further adjusted for BMI, partner’s age, female smoking, and alcohol intake at the time of embryo transfer. These factors, however, did not change the estimates and were omitted from the final model.

We used logistic regression computing the crude and the adjusted relative risk estimates for CMs diagnosed in all live-born children in singleton pregnancies, conceived after ART treatment in women with hyperthyroidism compared to children conceived after ART in women without thyroid disorders, and likewise in women with hypothyroidism compared to children after ART in women without thyroid disorders. The model accounted for multiple children by the same woman. In the analyses of the risk of CMs, we restricted our data to include only births after ART treatment between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2016, in order to have information on CMs in the offspring from the DMBR and at least 1-year follow-up. Diagnoses of dislocations of the hip and undescended testis were excluded from CMs due to low validity of these registrations.48

All data were stored and linked at a secure server, at the Danish health data authority (The “Sundhedsdatastyrelsen”). All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata V. 15.0 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Approvals and ethical considerations

The study is notified at the Danish Data Protection Agency under the current joint notification of the Region of Southern Denmark (ref.no. 2012-58-0018). According to Danish law, ethical review board approval or patient consent are not required for register-based studies.

Results

Table 1 provides the characteristics for all ART treatments in the two exposed cohorts and the unexposed cohort. A total of 2,010 embryo transfers in 698 women with hyperthyroidism, and 3,692 embryo transfers in 1,403 women with hypothyroidism conducted the exposed cohort during the study period of January 1 1994–30 June 2017. The unexposed cohort compromised a total of 193,972 embryo transfers in 65,526 women without thyroid disorders. In the two exposed cohorts, the cause of infertility was referred to as a female factor in 24.4% in hyperthyroidism, 13.2% in hypothyroidism, and 25.1% in the unexposed cohort. The frequency of ART treatments increased during the study period in all three cohorts. In women diagnosed with hyperthyroidism, 43.2% of the embryo transfers were in 2012–2017, compared to 76.5% in hypothyroidism, and 30.2% in the unexposed cohort during the same period. The median female age and the distribution according to smoking and alcohol consumption were similar in the unexposed and exposed cohorts whereas fewer women with hypothyroidism had normal weight compared to those with hyperthyroidism and the unexposed cohort. Furthermore, the proportion of obese women was 11.4% in women with hyperthyroidism, 12.1% in women with hypothyroidism, and 9.7% in the unexposed cohort. At the time of embryo transfer in patients with hyperthyroidism, the median duration of the thyroid disease was 52 months (25–75 percentiles: 21–98), and for patients with hypothyroidism the median duration of thyroid disease was 20 months (25–75 percentiles: 8–42). Women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism had more comorbid diseases than the women without thyroid disorders. However, the vast majority of women in all cohorts had no comorbid disorders.

Table 1

Descriptive characteristics of study cohorts of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments (embryo transfers) in women with hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and without thyroid disorders, during the study period of 1 January 1994 to 30 June 2017

Characteristics	Exposed cohort (embryo transfers in women with hyperthyroidism)(N=2,010)a,b	Exposed cohort (embryo transfers in women with hypothyroidism)(N=3,692)a,c	Unexposed cohort (embryo transfers in women without thyroid disease)a,d(N=193,972)
Age at embryo transfer
Median (25–75% percentiles)	36 (32–39)	35 (31–39)	34 (30–37)
Partner’s age at embryo transfer
Median (25–75% percentiles)	37 (33–41)	36 (33–40)	35 (32–40)
Cause of infertility, N (%)
Female factor	467 (24.4)	480 (13.2)	45,608 (25.1)
Male factor	466 (24.4)	1,129 (30.9)	58,147 (32.0)
Mixture of factors/idiopathic	978 (51.2)	2,041 (55.9)	78,164 (43.0)
Type of preceding treatment, N (%)
IVF	894 (44.8)	1,385 (37.8)	87,972 (45.6)
ICSI	665 (33.3)	1,275 (34.8)	67,471 (35.0)
FER/WBR	436 (21.9)	1,003 (27.4)	37,388 (19.4)
Body mass index, N (%)
<18.5 (underweight)	46 (3.6)	85 (3.0)	3,228 (3.3)
18.5–24.99 (normal)	802 (63.1)	1,705 (60.1)	61,811 (64.0)
25.00–29.99 (overweight)	278 (21.9)	705 (24.8)	22,145 (22.9)
≥30.00 (obese)	145 (11.4)	344 (12.1)	9,409 (9.7)
Smoking at the time of embryo transfer, N (%)
Non-smoker	1,167 (91.7)	2,711 (95.5)	87,640 (91.4)
Smoker	106 (8.3)	127 (4.5)	8,259 (8.6)
Alcohol, N (%)
No	712 (57.4)	1,598 (56.8)	50,833 (55.4)
Yes	529 (42.6)	1,215 (43.2)	41,006 (44.6)
Calendar year of infertility treatment, N (%)
1994–1999	120 (6.0)	42 (1.1)	30,553 (15.8)
2000–2005	347 (17.3)	151 (4.1)	45,801 (23.6)
2006–2011	675 (33.6)	673 (18.2)	59,106 (30.5)
2012–2017	868 (43.2)	2,826 (76.5)	58,512 (30.2)
Parity, N (%)
0	231 (60.5)	566 (66.0)	31,113 (68.0)
1+	151 (39.5)	291 (34.0)	14,638 (32.0)
Comorbidity at embryo transfers, N (%)
No comorbidity	1,700 (84.6)	3,019 (81.8)	176,737 (91.1)
Some comorbidity	310 (15.4)	673 (18.2)	17,235 (8.9)
Duration of thyroid disease at time of embryo transfer (months)
Median (25–75 percentiles)	52 (21–98)	20 (8–42)	-

Notes: aNumber of women in exposed hyperthyroidism cohort: 698, in exposed hypothyroidism cohort: 1,403 and in the unexposed cohort: 65,526. bMissing (%), women with hyperthyroidism: age of partner (30.9), fertility factor (4.9), ART treatment (0.7), parity (81.0), BMI (36.8), smoking at the time of embryo transfer (36.7), alcohol (38.3). cMissing (%), women with hypothyroidism: age of partner (13.7), fertility factor (1.3), ART treatment (0.6), parity (77.0), BMI (23.8), smoking at the time of embryo transfer (23.3), alcohol (24.0). dMissing (%), women without thyroid disease: age of partner (43.1), fertility factor (6.2), ART treatment (0.6), parity (76.4), BMI (50.2), smoking at the time of embryo transfer (50.6), alcohol (52.7).

Abbreviations: IVF, in vitro fertilization; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; FER/WBR, frozen-thawed embryos/warmed blastocyst replacement.

Outcomes: biochemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth

The chance of a biochemical pregnancy after each embryo transfer in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism is shown in Table 2, as is the chance of a clinical pregnancy. The adjusted OR of a positive hCG test after embryo transfer in women with hyperthyroidism was 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.93), and the aOR of a clinical pregnancy detected by an ultrasound examination was also reduced, 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.96).

Table 2

The chance of a biochemical pregnancy and a clinical pregnancy in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism after assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments (embryo transfers), during the study period of 1 January 1994 to 30 June 2017

	Exposed cohort (embryo transfers in women with hyperthyroidism)	Unexposed cohort (embryo transfers in women without thyroid disease)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)a
Biochemical pregnancy (hCG),b N (%)
Yes	610 (30.65)	68,627 (35.63)	0.78 (0.70–0.87)	0.80 (0.69–0.93)
No	1,380 (69.35)	123,992 (64.37)
Clinical pregnancy (ultrasound),c N (%)
Yes	345 (76.67)	33.675 (82,22)	0.69 (0.54–0.88)	0.74 (0.58–0.96)
No	105 (23.33)	7,280 (17.78)
	Exposed cohort (embryo transfers in women with hypothyroidism)	Unexposed cohort (embryo transfers in women without thyroid disease)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)a
Biochemical pregnancy (hCG),d N (%)
Yes	1,318 (36.48)	68,627 (35.63)	1.05 (0.97–1.13)	1.05 (0.97–1.14)
No	2,295 (63.52)	123,992 (64.37)
Clinical pregnancy (ultrasound),e N (%)
Yes	1,012 (81.55)	33,674 (82.22)	0.95 (0.80–1.11)	0.95 (0.81–1.12)
No	229 (18.45)	7,281 (17.78)

Notes: aAdjusted for Charlson index, women’s age, calendar year of treatment, type of treatment (IVF, ICSI, FER/WBR), cause of infertility (female factor, male factor, or mixture of factors/idiopathic). bNumber of embryo transfers in the exposed cohort: 1,990 (number of women: 697, number of missing: 20). Number of embryo transfers in the unexposed cohort: 192,619 (number of women: 65,486, number of missing: 1,353). cRestricted to 2006–June 2017 due to only valid data on ultrasound from 2006. Number of embryo transfers in the exposed cohort: 450 (number of women: 328) missing/not measured: 1,093. Number of embryo transfers in the unexposed cohort: 40,955 (number of women: 28,364) missing/not measured: 76,663. dNumber of embryo transfers in the exposed cohort: 3,613 (number of women: 1,399, number of missing: 79). Number of embryo transfers in the unexposed cohort: 192,619 (number of women: 65,486 number of missing: 1,353). eRestricted to 2006–June 2017 due to only valid data on ultrasound from 2006. Number of embryo transfers in the exposed cohort: 1,241 (number of women: 3,499) missing/not measured: 2,213. Number of embryo transfers in the unexposed cohort: 40,955 (number of women: 28,364) missing/not measured: 76,663.

In women with hypothyroidism undergoing ART treatment, the chance of a biochemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy was not decreased, aOR=1.05 (95% CI 0.97–1.14) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.81–1.12), respectively.

A total of 19.3% of the women with hyperthyroidism had a live-born child after embryo transfer, and 24.1% of the women in the unexposed cohort. The ORs for live birth in women with hyperthyroidism, compared with women without thyroid disorders, are given in Table 3. The chance of a live birth was significantly reduced for each embryo transfer in women with hyperthyroidism, aOR 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.98). A total of 23.6% of the women with hypothyroidism had a live-born child after embryo transfer (Table 3), and the chance of a live birth after embryo transfer in women with hypothyroidism, compared to women without thyroid disorders was close to unity (aOR=1.03, 95% CI 0.94–1.12).

Table 3

The chance of live birth in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism after assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments (embryo transfers), during the study period of 1 January 1994–30 June 2017

	Exposed cohort (embryo transfers in women with hyperthyroidism) (N=2,010)a	Unexposed cohort (embryo transfers in women without thyroid disease) (N=193,972)b	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted ORc (95% CI)
Live birth, N (%)
Yes	388 (19.30)	46,716 (24.08)	0.74 (0.65–0.84)	0.86 (0.76–0.98)
No	1,622 (80.70)	147,256 (75.92)
	Exposed cohort (embryo transfers in women with hypothyroidism) (N=3,692)d	Unexposed cohort (embryo transfers in women without thyroid disease) (N=193,972)e	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted ORc (95% CI)
Live birth
Yes	870 (23.56)	46,716 (24.08)	0.99 (0.90–1.08)	1.03 (0.94–1.12)
No	2,822 (76.44)	147,256 (75.92)

Notes: aNumber of women in the exposed cohort: 698. bNumber of women in the unexposed cohort: 65,526. cAdjusted for Charlson index, women’s age, calendar year of treatment, type of treatment (IVF, ICSI, FER/WBR), cause of infertility (female factor, male factor, or mixture of factors/idiopathic). dNumber of women in the exposed cohort: 1,403. eNumber of women in the unexposed cohort: 65,526.

Congenital malformations

Children of women with hyperthyroidism had no significantly increased risk of CM, aOR=1.03 (0.62–1.74) (Table 4). Children born to women with hypothyroidism had a significantly increased risk of CM compared to children of women without thyroid disorder, aOR=1.46 (95% CI 1.07–2.00). The types of CMs for women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism (Table S1 and S2) for all singleton pregnancies during the restricted study period.

Table 4

Crude and adjusted ORs, with 95% CI, for congenital malformations (CMs) in live born children, conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments of women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, compared with children born to women without thyroid disease. Study period from 1 January 2006 to 30 June 2016, and followed until 30 June 2017

	Exposed cohort (live born by women with hyperthyroidism)a	Unexposed cohort (live born by women without thyroid disease)b	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted ORc (95% CI)
Congenital malformations, N (%)
Yes	25 (8.33)	2,183 (7.70)	1.11 (0.68–1.82)	1.03 (0.62–1.74)
No	275 (91.67)	26,157 (92.30)
	Exposed cohort (live born by women with hypothyroidism)d	Unexposed cohort (live born by women without thyroid disease)e	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted ORc (95% CI)
Congenital malformations, N (%)
Yes	79 (11.32)	2,183 (7.70)	1.65 (1.23–2.22)	1.46 (1.07–2.00)
No	619 (88.68)	26,159 (92.30)

Notes: aNumber of exposed observations, live-born children (mothers): 300 (235). bNumber of non-exposed observations, live-born children (mothers): 28,340 (21,493). cAdjusted for Charlson index, women’s age, calendar year of treatment, type of treatment (IVF, ICSI, FER/WBR), cause of infertility (female factor, male factor, or mixture of factors/idiopathic) and smoking at the time of embryo transfer. dNumber of exposed observations, live-born children (mothers): 698 (574). eNumber of non-exposed observations, live-born children (mothers): 28,342 (21,494).

Table S1

Types of congenital malformations (CMs) in the children born by women with hypothyroidism from 1 January 2006 to June 2016, and followed until 30 June 2017

Types of CMs according to ICD-10a	Exposed, N (%)	Unexposed, N (%)
CMs within the nervous system [Q00–Q07]	3 (0.43)	54 (0.19)
CMs within eye, ear, facem, and neck [Q10–Q18]	1 (0.14)	101 (0.36)
CMs within circulation organs [Q20–Q28]	45 (6.45)	939 (3.31)
CMs in the respiratory organs [Q30–Q34]	6 (0.86)	94 (0.33)
Cleft lip and palate [Q35–Q37]	4 (0.57)	71 (0.25)
Other CMs in the digestive organs [Q38–Q45]	27 (3.87)	401 (1.41)
CMs in the genital organs [Q50–Q56]b	7 (1.01)	326 (1.15)
CMs in the urinary system [Q60–Q64]	8 (1.15)	114 (0.4)
CMs in the bones and muscles [Q65–Q79]c	22 (3.15)	729 (2.57)
Other CMs [Q80–Q89]d	4 (0.57)	84 (0.3)
Chromosome anomalies [Q90–Q99]	3 (0.43)	50 (0.18)

Notes: aChildren with CMs might have more than one type of CMs. bExclusive Q5.5x undescended testis. cExclusive Q65x dislocations of the hip. dNo distinct pattern of CMs within this group.

Table S2

Types of congenital malformations (CMs) in the children born by women with hyperthyroidism from 1 January 2006 to June 2016, and followed until 30 June 2017

Types of CMs according to ICD-10a	Exposed, N (%)	Unexposed, N (%)
CMs within the nervous system [Q00–Q07]	4 (0.57)	50 (0.18)
CMs within eye, ear, face, and neck [Q10–Q18]	1 (0.14)	85 (0.30)
CMs within circulation organs [Q20–Q28]	10 (1.43)	832 (2.94)
CMs in the respiratory organs [Q30–Q34]	1 (0.14)	86 (0.30)
Cleft lip and palate [Q35–Q37]	0 (0)	63 (0.22)
Other CMs in the digestive organs [Q38–Q45]	3 (0.43)	327 (1.15)
CMs in the genital organs [Q50–Q56]b	5 (0.72)	287 (1.01)
CMs in the urinary system [Q60–Q64]	9 (1.29)	96 (0.34)
CMs in the bones and muscles [Q65–Q79]c	8 (1.15)	624 (2.20)
Other CMs [Q80–Q89]d	1 (0.14)	74 (0.26)
Chromosome anomalies [Q90–Q99]	0 (0)	39 (0.14)

Notes: aChildren with CMs might have more than one type of CMs. bExclusive Q5.5x undescended testis. cExclusive Q65x dislocations of the hip. dNo distinct pattern of CMs within this group.

Discussion

In this nationwide cohort study of 23.5 years of assisted reproduction, we found that women with hyperthyroidism had a statistically significantly decreased chance of a live birth per embryo transfer, compared to embryo transfers in women without thyroid disorders. Our results also indicate that the reason for the decreased chance of a live birth could be related to inadequate implantation or early development of the embryo in the uterus, although the reasons so far are speculative. On the contrary, the chance of a live birth after embryo transfer in women with hypothyroidism was comparable to women without thyroid disorders undergoing ART treatment. Finally, our results suggest that children conceived through ART treatment in women with hypothyroidism had an increased risk of any CM, compared to children where the mother did not have thyroid disorders or had hyperthyroidism.

Examining the efficacy of ART in women with thyroid disorders is relevant for a number of reasons. Firstly, the prevalence of women with thyroid disorders during their fertile years has increased during the past decades from 0.41% in 1989–1993 to 2.29% in 2009–2013.1 Secondly, there is probably an association between thyroid autoimmunity and infertility. Studies have suggested an association between autoimmune thyroid disease and infertility; RR=2.1 (95% CI 1.7–2.6).49 One small study showed a prevalence of infertility in women with hyperthyroidism of 5–8%,50 whereas another study showed hypothyroidism in 9.4% of women with impaired fertility,51 and in women presenting with autoimmune dysthyroid, the prevalence of infertility reached 47% (Graves’ disease) and 52% (Hashimotos’ thyroiditis) with persistence of infertility despite obtaining euthyroid.52 These conclusions may also be relevant for women undergoing ART treatment. In a study of totally 2,012 women, 90 women presenting with anti-thyroid antibodies, in a cohort of 676 infertile women, had a significantly lower rate of fertilization, implementation, and pregnancy than women without these antibodies 64.3% vs 74.6%, 17.8% vs 27.1%, and 33.3% vs 46.7%, respectively.53

Thyroid hormones are essential developmental factors and perform their regulatory action by binding to nuclear thyroid hormone receptors, and dysfunction may interfere with numerous aspects of reproduction, including maturation of the oocytes and menstrual cycle,54 stages of fertilization, implantation, and the ability to carry the pregnancy throughout all trimesters,55 and the presence of thyroid auto-antibodies is greater in the context of early ovarian insufficiency.56 Thirdly, results on the efficacy of ART treatment in women with other autoimmune diseases have suggested a reduced chance of a live birth after ART treatment in women with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease (aOR=0.78 [95% CI 0.67–0.91] and 0.61 [95% CI 0.47–0.79], respectively),13,14 and 0.78 (95% CI 0.56–0.92) in rheumatoid arthritis,15 though the underlying mechanisms are unknown.

In Denmark, all female infertility patients have routinely been screened for thyroid disorders with measurements of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels at all fertility clinics during the past 5–10 years,57 and relevant medication is introduced prior to the infertility treatment. Emphasis has been placed on changes in the thyroid function and the consequences of thyroid disorders during pregnancy in the past decades.16,49 But, to the best of our knowledge, no previous nationwide cohort study has examined the chance of a live birth in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, compared to women without thyroid dysfunction undergoing ART treatment.58 However, a number of studies have examined the impact of thyroid dysfunction on ART treatment, based on clinical biomarkers in terms of measured antibodies, follicle counts, TSH levels, and hormone treatment.6,20–22,24–28 In women with thyroid antibodies, there was no difference in the chance of pregnancy and live birth compared to euthyroid women,24–28 and identical results were presented in a meta-analysis of ART outcomes in women with different preconception TSH levels.59 The comparison of these data to ours is problematic because of different inclusions,16 but indications of an decreased chance of a live birth have been suggested.27 In our study, we examined hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism separately.

A possible association between hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism during pregnancy and the risk of different CMs in the offspring has been described earlier,30,60–62 either as a consequence of hormonal imbalances or as a teratogenic effect of anti-thyroid medication in mature pregnancy. Nevertheless, no previous studies have examined if an association between hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism and CMs persists in women undergoing ART treatment. We confirmed a potential association between maternal hypothyroidism and CM, but not in children born to women with hyperthyroidism which is in accordance with a group of untreated patients with Graves’ disease in a study from Japan,62 but in contrast to findings referred to in a review from Cooper and Laurberg.61 However, none of the studies were on ART-treated women and our outcomes of CMs in both groups and restricted power of each type of anomalies are limited and the estimates should be interpreted with caution.

The precision and the validity of our study depends on the size of the study population, accurate classification of the exposure, the quality of the outcome data, and the ability to take into account the influence of important confounders. According to these aspects, our study has several strengths. Firstly, this study is based on a nationwide study population of all Danish women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism receiving ART treatment and using all other ART-treated women as controls. This was possible due to the ART register, which is based on mandatory registration of all individual treatment cycles in private and public clinics.33,34 Secondly, the nature of the long-lasting Danish health registries allowed a 23.5-year study period and the large cohort of ART treatments provided us with solid statistical power. Thirdly, information from the used Danish health registers is based on mandatory registrations and this produces data of high completeness and validity with a limited number of pitfalls.34–36,42–44 Regarding our outcome measurements on live birth, data from the DMBR are of high validity and completeness, and all new-born children are registered in this register.42–44 Furthermore, validation of the diagnoses of thyroid disorders in the general population only revealed misclassification in 2% of the cases in a study from 200263 which is in accordance with the generally high validity of the register.35 Fourthly, we also had access to data on a number of relevant confounders, including the Charlson comorbidity index, information on the origin of the infertility in terms of male, female or idiopathic factor as important variables,58,64 type of ART treatment, calendar year of ART treatment, age, BMI, smoking at the time of embryo transfer, and alcohol intake at time of infertility treatment, and the partner’s age at the time of infertility treatment. We only included women in the exposed cohort if the diagnoses were given before the embryo transfer, and to avoid misclassification; women who had both diagnoses of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism before embryo transfer were excluded. Finally, the outcomes studied were obtained independently of the hypotheses studied and exposure measurements, preventing differential misclassification of the outcome measurements.

The current study, however, also has limitations. We know from previous studies that biomarkers, including thyroid antibodies, TSH, thyroxine, etc. may play an important role on reproductive outcomes. However, we had no opportunity to examine a potential impact of biomarkers based in our dataset. Nonetheless, the TSH screening in infertile women introduces medical treatment if the levels are abnormal, and one might argue that mechanisms other than hormone imbalances contribute to the decreased chance of a live birth in our study. For instance, autoimmune factors could contribute to the decreased efficacy of ART if the underlying thyroid disorder is Graves’ disease or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.58 We did not have information on the etiology of the thyroid disorder, and some women might have had a non-autoimmune etiology. We did not have information on disease activity or any treatment the women received for their thyroid disorders prior to the embryo transfer. Furthermore, our data do not provide evidence for the underlying reason for the CM although any potential causes might be multifarious. Finally, we only included women who had diagnoses of either hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism before embryo transfer. We cannot rule out a potential misclassification of the thyroid disorders but any misclassification would most probably be non-differential and bias our results toward conservative estimates. Another limitation is that we were unable to assess very early abortions and stillbirths due to CM, including those due to antenatal diagnoses of CMs and additionally the included diagnoses cover a wide span of CMs across different organ systems. It is also a limitation that we did not have sufficient statistical power to estimate the risk of CMs according to specific subtypes of CMs. Thus, we could have underestimated the true relative risk of CM, if CMs after ART treatment resulting in stillbirths or very early abortions are more prevalent in women with hypothyroidism compared to women without thyroid disorders.

Conclusion

This study suggests that women with hyperthyroidism have a decreased chance of a live birth after ART treatment compared to women without thyroid disorders. Our results suggest that the cause could be related to an impaired chance of a biochemical and clinical pregnancy. These results also suggest that children, conceived through ART treatment in women with hypothyroidism, have an increased risk of CM diagnosed within their first year of life, but we cannot determine whether this finding is related to hypothyroidism or factors closely related to the disease (for instance medical treatments). Based on a nationwide cohort of ART treatments, these are the first results on the efficacy of ART treatment in women with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings and to understand the mechanisms behind the decreased chance of a live birth per embryo transfer in women with hyperthyroidism. It would be most valuable if such studies could include information on disease severity, medications, thyroid hormone levels, and antibodies.

Supplementary materials