| Literature DB >> 31496694 |
Christian Quijia Quezada1,2, Clênia S Azevedo1, Sébastien Charneau3, Jaime M Santana1, Marlus Chorilli2, Marcella B Carneiro4, Izabela Marques Dourado Bastos1.
Abstract
Chagas disease is one of the most important public health problems in Latin America due to its high mortality and morbidity levels. There is no effective treatment for this disease since drugs are usually toxic with low bioavailability. Serious efforts to achieve disease control and eventual eradication have been unsuccessful to date, emphasizing the need for rapid diagnosis, drug development, and a reliable vaccine. Novel systems for drug and vaccine administration based on nanocarriers represent a promising avenue for Chagas disease treatment. Nanoparticulate systems can reduce toxicity, and increase the efficacy and bioavailability of active compounds by prolonging release, and therefore improve the therapeutic index. Moreover, nanoparticles are able to interact with the host's immune system, modulating the immune response to favour the elimination of pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, new advances in diagnostic assays, such as nanobiosensors, are beneficial in that they enable precise identification of the pathogen. In this review, we provide an overview of the strategies and nanocarrier-based delivery systems for antichagasic agents, such as liposomes, micelles, nanoemulsions, polymeric and non-polymeric nanoparticles. We address recent progress, with a particular focus on the advances of nanovaccines and nanodiagnostics, exploring new perspectives on Chagas disease treatment.Entities:
Keywords: delivery systems; nanobiosensors; nanodiagnostics; nanoparticle systems; nanovaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31496694 PMCID: PMC6691952 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S206109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Nanomaterials used against Chagas disease. Strategies and application of nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems, such as liposomes, micelles, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, polymeric and non-polymeric nanoparticles to optimize the delivery of antitrypanosomal agents.
Polymeric and liposomal nanomaterials against Chagas disease in preclinical trials
| Nanomaterial | Nanostructure characterization | Biological analysis | Author | Ref # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical and/or chemical methodology | Active compound | Hydrodynamic diameter or size (nm) | ZP (mV) | PDI | Host Cell line | In vitro/in vivo | Administration route | |||||
| Self-emulsifying | RAV | 100–250 | −45–−57 | 0.20–0.30 | Y | Cardiomyocyte (H9c2) | In vivo | Swiss albino mice | Oral | Sposito et al (2017) | ||
| In vitro | Amastigotes | N.I. | ||||||||||
| Emulsion polymerization | Nifurtimox | <200 | N.I. | from chronic patients in northern Chile | Vero | In vitro | Epimastigotes | N.I. | Gonzalez-Martin et al (1998) | |||
| Cytotoxicity | ||||||||||||
| Allopurinol | Epimastigotes | Gonzalez-Martin et al (2000) | ||||||||||
| Amastigotes | ||||||||||||
| Simple emulsification | Bis-triazole D0870 | 100–200 | N.I. | CL and Y | N.I. | In vivo | Swiss albino mice | IV | Molina et al (2001) | |||
| Nanoprecipitation | LYC | 100−250 | −30–−57 | 0.30 | N.I | In vivo | C57BL/6 mice | IV | Branquinho, Roy, et al (2017) | |||
| Nanoprecipitation | LYC | 105.30−105.30 | N.I. | CL and Y | In vivo | IV | Branquinho et al (2014) | |||||
| Nanoprecipitation | UA | 173.20 | 36 | 0.09 | Y | LLC-MK2 | In vitro | Cytotoxicity | N.I. | Abriata et al (2017) | ||
| In vitro | Trypomastigotes | |||||||||||
| In vivo | C57BL/6 mice | IV | ||||||||||
| Ionotropic gelation | Nitric oxide | 270–500 | N.I. | 0.35 | Y | Murine peritoneal macrophage | In vitro | Trypomastigotes | N.I. | Seabra et al (2015) | ||
| Amastigotes | ||||||||||||
| Nanoprecipitation and freezedrying | BNZ | 233 | 35.40 | 0.10 | N.I. | Seremeta et al (2019) | ||||||
| Nanoprecipitation | BNZ | 63.30 | 18.3 | 3.35 | TcN | Vero | In vitro | Cytotoxicity | N.I. | Rial et al (2017) | ||
| In vivo | C3H/HeN mice | Oral | ||||||||||
| N.I. | Amphotericin B | N.I. | Tulahuen | In vivo | BALB/cJ | IP | Cencig et al (2011) | |||||
| Y | N.I. | Clemons et al (2017) | ||||||||||
| CL | ||||||||||||
| Hydration | Stearylamine | Tulahuen | In vitro | Epimastigotes, trypomastigotes and amastigotes | N.I. | Yoshihara et al (1987) | ||||||
| Extrusion | ETZ | 379 | N.I. | RA | Monocyte macrophage (J774) | In vitro | Amastigotes | N.I. | Morilla et al (2005) | |||
| In vivo | BALB/c mice | IV | ||||||||||
| Hydration | BNZ | 2000 | N.I. | RA | In vivo | Wistar rats | IV | Morilla et al (2004) | ||||
Abbreviations: BNZ, Benznidazole; mv, millivolt; IV, Intravenous injection; PACA, Poly (alkyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles; TcN, Nicaragua Strain; nps, Nanoparticles; PN, Nanoparticles with poly-Ɛ-caprolactone; NC, Nanocapsules; PCL, Poly-ε-caprolactone; PLA-PEG, polyethylene glycol-polylactide; ZP, Zeta potential; PDI, Polydispersity index; RAV, Ravuconazole; SEDDSs, Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems; Vero, Fibroblast of African green monkey kidney; LL-MK2, Fibroblast of monkey kidney; LYC, Lychnopholide; UA, Ursolic acid; N.I. not informed; RAS strain, pantropic/reticulotropic; T. cruzi, Trypanosoma cruzi.
Figure 2Hypothetical mechanisms of the internalization of pH-sensitive liposomes.
Other types of nanomaterials against Chagas disease in preclinical trials
| Nanomaterial | Nanostructure characterization | Biological analysis | Author | Ref # | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical and/or | Active compound | Hydro- | ZP (mV) | PDI | Cell line | In vitro/in vivo | Study model | Adminis-tration route | |||||
| Microemulsion | H2bdtc | 127.4 | −56.1 | 0.3 | Y | Spleen cells of | In vitro | Trypomastigotes | N.I. | Carneiro et al (2014) | |||
| N.I. | In vivo | Oral | |||||||||||
| Colloidal chemistry | Cd Te | N.I. | Dm28 | Intestinal epithelial cells of | In vitro | Epimastigotes | N.I. | Stahl et al (2010) | |||||
| Emulsification | Ursolic acid | 57.3 | N.I. | 0.24 | CL Brener | LLC-MK2 | In vitro | Cytotoxicity | N.I. | De Oliveira et al (2017) | |||
| In vitro | Amastigotes | ||||||||||||
| Clove oil ( | 35 −100 | 0.3 | DM28c and Y | Macrophages (RAW 267.4) | In vitro | Epimastigotes | Vermelho et al (2017) | ||||||
| In vitro | Cytotoxicity | ||||||||||||
| BZ | 241.60 | −71.41 | 0.23 | Y | Vero and SiHa | In vitro | Cytotoxicity | N.I. | Streck et al (2019) | ||||
| In vitro | Epimastigotes and trypomastigotes | ||||||||||||
| AmB-AME | Amphotericin B | 1–10 x103 | N.I. | Clone CL- B5 | Fibroblasts (NCTC-929) | In vitro | Amastigotes | N.I. | Rolon et al (2017) | ||||
| AmB-NaDC | 30 | Y | In vivo | BALB/c | Intracardiac | ||||||||
| Hydration | BNZ | N.I. | −11.5 | N.I. | CL Brener | N.I. | In vitro | Epimastigotes | N.I. | Nhavene et al (2018) | |||
Abbreviations: PDI, Polydispersity index; ZP, Zeta potential; SLN, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles; H2bdtc, 5-hydroxy-3-methyl-5-phenyl-pyrazoline-1- S-Benzyl dithiocarbazate; CdTe, Cadmium telluride solution; AMB, amphotericin B liposomes; AmB-AME, amphotericin B liposomes - polyamide encapsulated in albumin microspheres; AmB-NaDC, Dimeric amphotericin B liposomes - sodium deoxycholate micelles; N.I. not informed; BNZ, Benznidazole; LLC-MK2, Fibroblast of monkey kidney.
Figure 3Chunap assay for the early diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease. Chunap (Chagas urine nanoparticle assay) is to perform an early and non-invasive diagnosis for congenital Chagas disease, by concentrating, preserving and detecting antigens secreted/excreted by trypomastigote forms (TESA) from urine by Western Blot.