Literature DB >> 31496494

Assessing Impact of Biomedical Scholarship in the Information Age: Observations on the Evolution of Biomedical Publishing and a Proposal for a New Metric.

Robert Hogan1,2.   

Abstract

This editorial contains a discussion on the state of the art of biomedical publication and the history and development of indexing, its evolution, and complexity. A traditional method of journal assessment is in use-the journal impact factor-but it is compromised by well-documented deficiencies. Present-day alternatives to the journal impact factor are listed, and a proposal to develop a novel metric of merit in publication, the influence factor, is described.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31496494      PMCID: PMC6730957          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/18.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  12 in total

1.  Impact factors: uses and abuses.

Authors:  James Neuberger; Christopher Counsell
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.

Authors:  E GARFIELD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.

Authors:  J Beall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature.

Authors:  Julia Andersen; John Belmont; Cheng T Cho
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.399

5.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views.

Authors:  Mabel Chew; Elmer V Villanueva; Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Impact factor: time to move on.

Authors:  K Satyanarayana; Anju Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Vasilios D Kouranos; Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

10.  Reliability of journal impact factor rankings.

Authors:  Darren C Greenwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.