Congcong Zhang1, Min Lou1, Zhicai Chen1, Hongfang Chen2, Dongjuan Xu3, Zhimin Wang4, Haifang Hu5, Chenglong Wu6, Xiaoling Zhang7, Xiaodong Ma8, Yaxian Wang9, Haitao Hu1. 1. Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China. 2. Department of Neurology, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang Province, China. 3. Department of Neurology, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang 322100, Zhejiang Province, China. 4. Department of Neurology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou 318020, Zhejiang Province, China. 5. Department of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou 311201, China. 6. Department of Neurology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang Province, China. 7. Department of Neurology, Jiaxing Second Hospital, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China. 8. Department of Neurology, Haiyan People's Hospital, Haiyan 314300, Zhejiang Province, China. 9. Department of Neurology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou 313003, Zhejiang Province, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the time delay between in-hospital stroke and out-of-hospital stroke patients, and to explore the influence factors for the prognosis of in-hospital stroke patients treated by intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Clinical data of 3050 patients with ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis in 71 hospitals in Zhejiang province from June 2017 to September 2018 were analyzed. Differences of time delay including door to imaging time (DIT), imaging to needle time (INT) and door to needle time (DNT) between in-hospital stroke (n=101) and out-of-hospital stroke (n=2949) were observed. The influencing factors for the outcome at 3 month after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with in-hospital stroke were analyzed using binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with in-hospital stroke had longer DIT[53.5 (32.0-79.8) min vs. 20.0 (14.0-28.0) min, P<0.01], longer IDT[47.5(27.3-64.0)min vs. 36.0(24.0-53.0)min, P<0.01], and longer DNT[99.0 (70.5-140.5) min vs. 55.0 (41.0-74.0) min, P<0.01], compared with patients with out-of-hospital stroke; patients in comprehensive stroke center had longer DIT[59.5(44.5-83.3) min vs. 37.5(16.5-63.5) min, P<0.01], longer DNT[110.0(77.0-145.0) min vs. 88.0 (53.8-124.3) min, P<0.05], but shorter INT[36.5(23.8-60.3)min vs. 53.5 (34.3-64.8) min, P<0.05], compared with patients in primary stroke center. Age (OR=0.934, 95%CI: 0.882-0.989, P<0.05) and baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (OR=0.912, 95%CI: 0.855-0.973, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for prognosis of in-hospital stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital stroke had longer DIT and DNT than out-of-hospital stroke, which suggests that a more smooth thrombolysis process of in-hospital stroke should be established.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the time delay between in-hospital stroke and out-of-hospital stroke patients, and to explore the influence factors for the prognosis of in-hospital stroke patients treated by intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Clinical data of 3050 patients with ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis in 71 hospitals in Zhejiang province from June 2017 to September 2018 were analyzed. Differences of time delay including door to imaging time (DIT), imaging to needle time (INT) and door to needle time (DNT) between in-hospital stroke (n=101) and out-of-hospital stroke (n=2949) were observed. The influencing factors for the outcome at 3 month after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with in-hospital stroke were analyzed using binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with in-hospital stroke had longer DIT[53.5 (32.0-79.8) min vs. 20.0 (14.0-28.0) min, P<0.01], longer IDT[47.5(27.3-64.0)min vs. 36.0(24.0-53.0)min, P<0.01], and longer DNT[99.0 (70.5-140.5) min vs. 55.0 (41.0-74.0) min, P<0.01], compared with patients with out-of-hospital stroke; patients in comprehensive stroke center had longer DIT[59.5(44.5-83.3) min vs. 37.5(16.5-63.5) min, P<0.01], longer DNT[110.0(77.0-145.0) min vs. 88.0 (53.8-124.3) min, P<0.05], but shorter INT[36.5(23.8-60.3)min vs. 53.5 (34.3-64.8) min, P<0.05], compared with patients in primary stroke center. Age (OR=0.934, 95%CI: 0.882-0.989, P<0.05) and baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (OR=0.912, 95%CI: 0.855-0.973, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for prognosis of in-hospital stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital stroke had longer DIT and DNT than out-of-hospital stroke, which suggests that a more smooth thrombolysis process of in-hospital stroke should be established.
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Jeffrey L Saver; Mathew J Reeves; Deepak L Bhatt; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; DaiWai M Olson; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ashkan Mowla; Jordan Doyle; Navdeep S Lail; Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; Christopher Deline; Peyman Shirani; Marilou Ching; Annemarie Crumlish; Deborah A Steck; David Janicke; Elad I Levy; Robert N Sawyer Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Muhammad U Farooq; Mathew J Reeves; Julia Gargano; Susan Wehner; Susan Hickenbottom; Arshad Majid Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2007-11-22 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Kolja Schürmann; Omid Nikoubashman; Björn Falkenburger; Simone C Tauber; Martin Wiesmann; Jörg B Schulz; Arno Reich Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.849