Irja Haapala1,2, Ashley Carr1, Simon Biggs1,3,4. 1. School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland. 3. Brotherhood of St Laurence, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Faculty of Social Sciences, Social and Public Policy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the overlap between priorities expressed by representatives from national and local campaigning organisations and the views of key voices in relation to dementia. METHODS: Semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 19 representatives from campaigning organisations, including nine countries and six local community initiatives in Australia. Responses were categorised into nine priorities. Views were compared to the voices of people with dementia (n = 19), carers (n = 28), and health-care (n = 21), social work (n = 23) and service professionals (n = 20). RESULTS: Local groups prioritised user-led decision-making and community normalising agendas. National groups were influenced by service frameworks and increasing public awareness. Professional and carer groups focused on increasing understanding and communication skills while people with dementia valued being a normal part of society. CONCLUSION: Future campaigning should use both national and local approaches to changing social relations, through interpersonal connections, advocacy and social mobilisation, to promote a normalising approach to attitude change.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the overlap between priorities expressed by representatives from national and local campaigning organisations and the views of key voices in relation to dementia. METHODS: Semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 19 representatives from campaigning organisations, including nine countries and six local community initiatives in Australia. Responses were categorised into nine priorities. Views were compared to the voices of people with dementia (n = 19), carers (n = 28), and health-care (n = 21), social work (n = 23) and service professionals (n = 20). RESULTS: Local groups prioritised user-led decision-making and community normalising agendas. National groups were influenced by service frameworks and increasing public awareness. Professional and carer groups focused on increasing understanding and communication skills while people with dementia valued being a normal part of society. CONCLUSION: Future campaigning should use both national and local approaches to changing social relations, through interpersonal connections, advocacy and social mobilisation, to promote a normalising approach to attitude change.
Authors: Marjolein Thijssen; Ramon Daniels; Monique Lexis; Rianne Jansens; José Peeters; Neil Chadborn; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink; Maud Graff Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 3.850