Literature DB >> 31495826

Modified Radical Mastectomy for Male Breast Cancer.

Mahmoud Musa Al Awayshih1, Mohammad Nabih Nofal1, Ali Jad Yousef1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cancer of the male breast is a rare malignancy comprising less than 1% of all male cancers. The traditional surgical management for male breast cancer is modified radical mastectomy. Other surgical methods such as breast conserving surgery with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy have been used with variable results. CASE REPORT A 35-year old male presented with a 2×2 cm right breast adenocarcinoma. Modified radical mastectomy for male breast cancer as the traditional surgical operation for this rare malignancy is illustrated with special emphasis on oncologic sound resection. CONCLUSIONS Modified radical mastectomy is the corner stone surgical treatment for male breast cancer even though the breast tissue rudimentary. The recurrence of male breast cancer is less with mastectomy than breast conserving surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31495826      PMCID: PMC6753659          DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.916947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Case Rep        ISSN: 1941-5923


Background

Until now, prospective randomized trials to support a specific treatment approach in male breast cancer are not available. Most of the treatment modalities used in male breast cancer are gained from data from female breast cancer trials. Surgery is the cornerstone management of male breast cancer. For most of the 20th century the usual surgical management for localized male breast cancer was radical mastectomy, until the 1970s when it was replaced by more conserving surgical operations such as modified radical mastectomy or simple mastectomy [1]. Currently modified radical mastectomy is the traditional surgical treatment of male breast cancer because of the scarce male breast tissue, the usual retroareolar neoplasm location, early involvement of the nipple, and the unwanted side effects of adjuvant therapy necessary in breast conserving surgery [2].

Case Report

A 35-year-old male presented with a 3-month history of slowly growing right breast mass destroying the nipple with bloody discharge and mild pain. His family history was negative for male or female breast cancer. He had no history of radiation exposure or hormonal treatment. Physical examination showed right breast hard retroareolar mass with destructed nipple and bloody nipple discharge and palpable firm right axillary lymph nodes. Mammography and ultrasonography showed a 2×2 cm right breast mass with enlarged axillary lymph nodes. Core biopsy proved right breast triple negative adenocarcinoma. On full recovery the patient returned to his home country and was lost to follow up.

Surgical technique

The surgery was done using general anesthesia and the patient positioned supine, the arm on the surgery site abducted, and the right shoulder supported with a pillow as needed. Marking of the skin incision was done in an elliptical fashion to include the nipple areola complex and the skin overlying the tumor and to facilitate closure without tension, if possible. The incision extended from the sternal edge medially to the latissimus dorsi muscle anterior border (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Marking of the skin incision in an elliptical fashion. The tumor site is over shadowed.

Breast dissection started with creating upper and lower flaps. The difference from the female breast operation is that the Cooper’s ligament which usually determines the level of dissection between the subcutaneous fat and breast fat is absent in the male breast. Thus, dissection should be carried out with wise judgment not to leave thin skin and have skin necrosis, or thick subcutaneous fat and risk recurrence. Dissection was carried out in the upper flap to reach the clavipectoral fascia superiorly (Figure 2), edge of the sternum medially, and the outer edge of pectoralis major muscle laterally.
Figure 2.

Creating upper and lower dissection flaps, showing clavipectoral fascia.

The lower flap was created to the presumed infra mammary fold crease. The fibers of abdominal external oblique and serratus anterior muscles are reached in dissection bed. Dissection medial and lateral borders are the same for the upper flap. The next step was to elevate the breast tissue from the deep pectoral fascia, and it was preferably started from the upper medial angle operating downwards obliquely. The common difference from a female operation is that the breast tissue in males is rudimentary and retro areolar is the most common site of the tumor. However, sometimes the tumor is eccentric, and care should be taken to have a sound resection of the deep margin. A major anatomical difference between female and male breast tissue is that the superficial and deep pectoral fascia enclosing the breast in the female is loose areolar tissue covering the pectoralis major muscle in the male, so sometimes it is necessary to excise the pectoralis major muscle aponeurosis or part of the muscle itself if involved by the tumor as judged pre- and intra-operatively (Figure 3). The whole specimen in our patient case was on the pectoralis major muscle lateral margin.
Figure 3.

Dissection bed showing (1) the pectoralis major muscle, (2) the pectoralis minor muscle, (3) the axillary vein, and (4) the long thoracic neurovascular bundle.

The next step was to enter the axilla through incising pectoral fascia on the pectoralis major muscle outer margin to clear the axillary content en bloc with the breast. Fibrofatty tissue was dissected away from the underlying chest wall muscle reaching behind the pectoralis major muscle and retracting it medially until the lateral edge of the pectoralis minor muscle was reached medially and axillary vein superiorly. This accomplished level I dissection of axillary lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was not planned because of the clinically palpable lymph nodes. Dissection included fibro fatty tissue behind the pectoralis minor muscle and below the axillary vein ends level II axillary lymph nodes dissection (Figure 3). In general, there was usually no need to do level III dissection except in specific situations, and no need to do dissection above the axillary vein, thus minimizing the risk of upper limb lymphedema. The axillary fat containing the lymph nodes was cleared from the axillary vein by doubly ligating at 1 or 2 vertical tributaries. However, ligation of any vessel running horizontally is generally prohibited for fear of being a normal variation of the axillary vein. The long thoracic and thoracodorsal vessels and nerves should be identified and meticulously spared while dissecting the fibro fatty tissue down between them.The specimen was taken out after cutting the axillary content at the lower edge at the level of the angular vein. The wound was closed without tension over a vacuum drain inserted in the axilla (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Wound closure without undue tension can be achieved with staples or interrupted or continuous mattress or subcuticular sutures over a vacuum drain.

Simple closure over 2 vacuum drains was achieved without tension. Finally, the specimen was oriented for pathologic examination.

Discussion

There are no specific guidelines for male breast cancer treatment as there are for female breast cancer. Indeed, most locoregional management data came from retrospective or pilot studies, with a possible bias from data analysis collected over a long period of time. The types of surgical operations for male breast cancer are: radical mastectomy in which the nipple-areola complex, which is the most common site for the neoplasm, is excised together with wide skin elliptical margins en bloc with underlying pectoralis major muscle and axillary dissection; modified radical mastectomy in which the nipple-areola complex and breast skin and underlying fat are removed en bloc with the axillary content with preservation of the pectoralis major muscle, although sometimes part of the muscle can be excised if involved by the tumor; simple mastectomy in which the nipple-areola complex and surrounding skin eclipse and underlying fat are removed without the axilla; lumpectomy in which the mass is excised with a safety margin of 2 cm usually. The types of surgeries used to treat male breast cancer are modified radical mastectomy in 70% cases, radical mastectomy in 8–30%, total mastectomy in 5–14%, and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in 1–13% as shown in earlier reports [3,4]. Recent reports showed increasing trend towards breast conserving surgery reaching up to 17% in all male breast cancer surgically treated cases [5]. Radical mastectomy involves nipple-areola complex and wide skin excision resulting sometimes in difficult skin and chest wall closure. Reconstructive surgical methods such latissimus dorsi or transverse thoracoepigastric skin flaps have been used to close the chest wall [6]. Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap was preferred by other surgeons because it will replace the resected skin and fat with a hairy skin similar to the skin of the male breast. The nipple-areola complex can be reconstructed by tattoo or surgery [7]. For selected male patients with small tumors or when the breast neoplasm is associated with gynecomastia; breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy produced encouraging results [8]. To prevent the undesirable axillary lymph nodes dissection side effects such as lymphedema and nerve injuries, sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer cases was used and proved to be feasible and reliable in predicting the status of axillary nodal involvement with detection rate close to 100% [9]. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is indicated when the tumor size is smaller than 2.5 cm with no clinical evidence of axillary lymph nodes metastases [10].

Conclusions

Male breast cancer should be managed as a rare malignant disorder. However, surgery in the form of modified radical mastectomy is the standard choice albeit rudimentary breast tissue and new methods of breast conserving surgery are evolving.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Strategies in treating male breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Cutuli
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.889

2.  Breast reconstruction in a male with a transverse rectus abdominis flap.

Authors:  S L Spear; D G Bowen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955-1996.

Authors:  P E Goss; C Reid; M Pintilie; R Lim; N Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Is Breast Conserving Therapy a Safe Modality for Early-Stage Male Breast Cancer?

Authors:  David Zaenger; Bryan M Rabatic; Byron Dasher; Waleed F Mourad
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  An update on male breast cancer and future directions for research and treatment.

Authors:  Berta Sousa; Elizabeth Moser; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 6.  [Carcinoma of the male breast: reconstructive technique].

Authors:  P Cagliá; P F Veroux; P Cardillo; A Nicosia; F Mio; C Amodeo
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep

Review 7.  How to treat male breast cancer.

Authors:  Kamila Czene; Czene Kamila; Jenny Bergqvist; Bergqvist Jenny; Per Hall; Hall Per; Jonas Bergh; Bergh Jonas
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 8.  Male breast cancer: a special therapeutic problem. Anything new? (Review).

Authors:  Roberto Gennari; Giuseppe Curigliano; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Renne; Mattia Intra; Viviana Galimberti; Alberto Luini; Roberto Orecchia; Giuseppe Viale; Aron Goldhrisch; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 9.  Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases.

Authors:  B Cutuli; M Lacroze; J M Dilhuydy; M Velten; B De Lafontan; C Marchal; M Resbeut; Y Graic; F Campana; V Moncho-Bernier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Breast conservation for male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Jennifer Rusby; Francisco Dominguez; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 4.380

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Efficacy and Psychology of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy on Patients with Early Breast Cancer under Graded Nursing.

Authors:  Tiantian Ren; Jianli Wu; Lu Qian; Jing Liu; Kan Ni
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.809

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.