Literature DB >> 31495733

Directional DBS leads show large deviations from their intended implantation orientation.

T A Dembek1, M Hoevels2, A Hellerbach3, A Horn4, J N Petry-Schmelzer5, J Borggrefe6, J Wirths7, H S Dafsari8, M T Barbe9, V Visser-Vandewalle10, H Treuer11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lead orientation is a new degree of freedom with directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads. We investigated how prevalent deviations from the intended implantation direction are in a large patient cohort.
METHODS: The Directional Orientation Detection (DiODe) algorithm to determine lead orientation from postoperative CT scans was implemented into the open-source Lead-DBS toolbox. Lead orientation was analyzed in 100 consecutive patients (198 leads). Different anatomical targets and intraoperative setups were compared.
RESULTS: Deviations of up to 90° from the intended implantation direction were observed. Deviations of more than 30° were seen in 42% of the leads and deviations of more than 60° in about 11% of the leads. Deviations were independent from the neuroanatomical target and the stereotactic frame but increased depending on which microdrive was used. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that large deviations from the intended implantation direction are a common phenomenon in directional leads. Postoperative determination of lead orientation is thus mandatory for investigating directional DBS.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Directional stimulation; Lead orientation; Postoperative CT

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31495733     DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord        ISSN: 1353-8020            Impact factor:   4.891


  10 in total

1.  Structure-function relationship of the posterior subthalamic area with directional deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Lévy; T A Khoa Nguyen; Lenard Lachenmayer; Ines Debove; Gerd Tinkhauser; Katrin Petermann; Alba Segura Amil; Joan Michelis; Michael Schüpbach; Andreas Nowacki; Claudio Pollo
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.881

2.  Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Optogenetics, Ethical Issues Affecting DBS Research, Neuromodulatory Approaches for Depression, Adaptive Neurostimulation, and Emerging DBS Technologies.

Authors:  Vinata Vedam-Mai; Karl Deisseroth; James Giordano; Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz; Winston Chiong; Nanthia Suthana; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Jay Gill; Wayne Goodman; Nicole R Provenza; Casey H Halpern; Rajat S Shivacharan; Tricia N Cunningham; Sameer A Sheth; Nader Pouratian; Katherine W Scangos; Helen S Mayberg; Andreas Horn; Kara A Johnson; Christopher R Butson; Ro'ee Gilron; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert Wilt; Maria Yaroshinsky; Simon Little; Philip Starr; Greg Worrell; Prasad Shirvalkar; Edward Chang; Jens Volkmann; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Andrea A Kühn; Luming Li; Matthew Johnson; Kevin J Otto; Robert Raike; Steve Goetz; Chengyuan Wu; Peter Silburn; Binith Cheeran; Yagna J Pathak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Aysegul Gunduz; Joshua K Wong; Stephanie Cernera; Wei Hu; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Wissam Deeb; Addie Patterson; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Towards Tracking of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Using an Integrated Magnetometer.

Authors:  Thomas Quirin; Corentin Féry; Dorian Vogel; Céline Vergne; Mathieu Sarracanie; Najat Salameh; Morgan Madec; Simone Hemm; Luc Hébrard; Joris Pascal
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Selecting the Most Effective DBS Contact in Essential Tremor Patients Based on Individual Tractography.

Authors:  Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer; Till A Dembek; Julia K Steffen; Hannah Jergas; Haidar S Dafsari; Gereon R Fink; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Michael T Barbe
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-12-20

5.  Surgical Strategy for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masuda; Hiroshi Shirozu; Yosuke Ito; Masafumi Fukuda; Yukihiko Fujii
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Local anatomy, stimulation site, and time alter directional deep brain stimulation impedances.

Authors:  Joseph W Olson; Christopher L Gonzalez; Sarah Brinkerhoff; Maria Boolos; Melissa H Wade; Christopher P Hurt; Arie Nakhmani; Bart L Guthrie; Harrison C Walker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 7.  Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Joachim K Krauss; Nir Lipsman; Tipu Aziz; Alexandre Boutet; Peter Brown; Jin Woo Chang; Benjamin Davidson; Warren M Grill; Marwan I Hariz; Andreas Horn; Michael Schulder; Antonios Mammis; Peter A Tass; Jens Volkmann; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 8.  Current Directions in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease-Directing Current to Maximize Clinical Benefit.

Authors:  Aristide Merola; Alberto Romagnolo; Vibhor Krishna; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Stephen Carcieri; Steven Goetz; George Mandybur; Andrew P Duker; Brian Dalm; John D Rolston; Alfonso Fasano; Leo Verhagen
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2020-03-09

9.  In silico Accuracy and Energy Efficiency of Two Steering Paradigms in Directional Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  León Mauricio Juárez-Paz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Deep brain stimulation electrodes may rotate after implantation-an animal study.

Authors:  Alexander Rau; H Urbach; V A Coenen; K Egger; P C Reinacher
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.042

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.