Literature DB >> 31495516

Vienna-II ring applicator for distal parametrial/pelvic wall disease in cervical cancer brachytherapy: An experience from two institutions: Clinical feasibility and outcome.

Umesh Mahantshetty1, Alina Sturdza2, Pushpa Naga Ch3, Daniel Berger4, Israel Fortin5, Laura Motisi6, Maximilian P Schmid4, Dheera Aravindakshan3, Yogesh Ghadi3, Jamema V Swamidas7, Supriya Chopra7, Lavanya Gurram3, Nicole Nesvacil8, Christian Kirisits8, Richard Pötter8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent evidence from EMBRACE shows that around 16% patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) have residual tumor in distal parametrium (DP) and pelvic wall disease (LPW) after concurrent radio-chemotherapy (CCRT). Adequate target coverage with standard brachytherapy approaches represents a challenge. Therefore, we modified the Vienna I applicator with an add-on cap allowing for additional oblique needles into the DP/LPW (Vienna II). We report here the feasibility and clinical outcomes using Vienna II applicator in LACC patients treated in 2 institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 69 patients with residual disease in DP/LPW after CCRT were accrued. FIGO (2009) stage was 26% IIB, 52% III, 15% IVA, 7% IVB (para-aortic nodes). At diagnosis 91% had disease involving DP/LPW. After CCRT, patients underwent image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) using Vienna II applicator. IGABT details, acute complications, dose volume parameters and clinical outcome variables were compiled and analyzed.
RESULTS: Residual DP/LPW disease at BT was found in 90% patients. Median total number of needles were 7 [3-15], oblique 4 [1-7]. Manageable intraoperative utero-vaginal complications occurred in 8 patients and manageable arterial bleeding in 6 patients during removal. Mean distance between tandem and outer contour of CTVHR was 38 mm and mean CTVHR (±SD) volume was 69 ± 32 cm3. The mean D90 CTVHR was 86 ± 7 Gy (EQD2) and mean (±SD) D2cm3 (Gy, EQD2) 86 ± 12, 68 ± 7, 68 ± 9 for bladder, rectum and sigmoid respectively. Actuarial LC, PFS, OS at 3/5 years was 76/72%, 56/50%, 62/54% and G3-4 late toxicities (n = 23) were observed in 14 patients (20%).
CONCLUSIONS: IGABT using Vienna II applicator allows for appropriate target coverage in tumors extending into DP/LPW at the time of BT. Clinical use is feasible and results in good local control, DFS and OS with moderate rate of acute and late ≥G3 toxicity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy; Vienna II applicator

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31495516     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

1.  Combined external pelvic chemoradiotherapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma: experience from a single institution.

Authors:  Sigrid Möller; Louise Bohr Mordhorst; Ruth Sanchez Hermansson; Leif Karlsson; Ulf Granlund; Cecilia Riemarsma; Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-08-21

2.  Venezia applicator with oblique needles improves clinical target volume coverage in distal parametrial tumor residue compared to parallel needles only.

Authors:  Manon Kissel; Nathalie Fournier-Bidoz; Olivier Henry; Sophie Bockel; Tamizhanban Kumar; Sophie Espenel; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-02-18

3.  Hybrid tandem and ovoids brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: impact of dose and tumor volume metrics on outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda Rivera; Monica Wassel; Patrik N Brodin; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Christian Velten; Rafi Kabarriti; Madhur Garg; Shalom Kalnicki; Keyur J Mehta
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 4.  Evolution of Brachytherapy Applicators for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ankur Mourya; Lalit Mohan Aggarwal; Sunil Choudhary
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 5.  Contribution of Tata Memorial Centre, India, to cervical cancer care: Journey of two decades.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar; Supriya Chopra; Sudeep Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

6.  Early clinical outcomes of hybrid brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: making adverse situations in a favorable scenario.

Authors:  Leonel Varela Cagetti; Christophe Zemmour; Eric Lambaudie; Magalie Provansal; Renaud Sabatier; Laura Sabiani; Guillaume Blache; Camille Jauffret; Marjorie Ferré; Agnès Tallet; Laurence Gonzague
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-08-17

7.  Analysis of Applicator Insertion Related Acute Side Effects for Cervical Cancer Treated With Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jiajun Chen; Ning Zhang; Ying Liu; Dongmei Han; Zhuang Mao; Wei Yang; Guanghui Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.