Yang Zhan1, Jian Wang2, Wan-Liang Guo3. 1. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. 2. Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. Electronic address: gwlsuzhou@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI, colostography/fistulography, and X-ray imaging modalities for preoperative diagnosis of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in pediatric patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included a total of 84 pediatric patients with ARMs. Preoperative imaging findings were assessed by 2 radiologists and compared to surgical findings. RESULTS: MRI identified anomalies of the spine in 25 of 84 patients (29.8%), anomalies of the genital system in 7 of 84 patients (8.3%), anomalies of the urinary system in 22 of 84 patients (26.2%), and underdeveloped sphincter muscle complex in 34 of 84 patients (40.5%). In the 44 subjects receiving both MRI and X-ray, MRI was more sensitive in detecting anomalies of spine (18/44 vs. 8/44; P = 0.002), and both correctly identified the distal end of the rectum in 77.3% (34/44) of the cases. In the 24 subjects receiving both MRI and colostography/fistulography, MRI was more accurate in identifying Pena's classification (22/24 vs. 15/24; P = 0.039). Distal end of the rectum was correctly identified in 75.0% (18/24) and 58.3% (14/24) of the cases (P = 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: MRI could clearly reveal fistula anatomy and associated anomalies of ARMs and should be routinely used for preoperative evaluation of ARMs. TYPE OF STUDY: Study of diagnostic test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI, colostography/fistulography, and X-ray imaging modalities for preoperative diagnosis of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in pediatric patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included a total of 84 pediatric patients with ARMs. Preoperative imaging findings were assessed by 2 radiologists and compared to surgical findings. RESULTS: MRI identified anomalies of the spine in 25 of 84 patients (29.8%), anomalies of the genital system in 7 of 84 patients (8.3%), anomalies of the urinary system in 22 of 84 patients (26.2%), and underdeveloped sphincter muscle complex in 34 of 84 patients (40.5%). In the 44 subjects receiving both MRI and X-ray, MRI was more sensitive in detecting anomalies of spine (18/44 vs. 8/44; P = 0.002), and both correctly identified the distal end of the rectum in 77.3% (34/44) of the cases. In the 24 subjects receiving both MRI and colostography/fistulography, MRI was more accurate in identifying Pena's classification (22/24 vs. 15/24; P = 0.039). Distal end of the rectum was correctly identified in 75.0% (18/24) and 58.3% (14/24) of the cases (P = 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: MRI could clearly reveal fistula anatomy and associated anomalies of ARMs and should be routinely used for preoperative evaluation of ARMs. TYPE OF STUDY: Study of diagnostic test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.