Literature DB >> 31495233

Integrating finite element modelling and 3D printing to engineer biomimetic polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Rossana Schipani1,2, David R Nolan1,2, Caitrίona Lally1,2, Daniel J Kelly1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

The suitability of a scaffold for tissue engineering is determined by a number of interrelated factors. The biomaterial should be biocompatible and cell instructive, with a porosity and pore interconnectivity that facilitates cellular migration and the transport of nutrients and waste products into and out of the scaffolds. For the engineering of load bearing tissues, the scaffold may also be required to possess specific mechanical properties and/or ensure the transfer of mechanical stimuli to cells to direct their differentiation. Achieving these design goals is challenging, but could potentially be realised by integrating computational tools such as finite element (FE) modelling with three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques to assess how scaffold architecture and material properties influence the performance of the implant. In this study we first use Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) to modulate the architecture of polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds, exploring the influence of varying fibre diameter, spacing and laydown pattern on the structural and mechanical properties of such scaffolds. We next demonstrate that a simple FE modelling strategy, which captures key aspects of the printed scaffold's actual geometry and material behaviour, can be used to accurately model the mechanical characteristics of such scaffolds. We then show the utility of this strategy by using FE modelling to help design 3D printed scaffolds with mechanical properties mimicking that of articular cartilage. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that a relatively simple FE modelling approach can be used to inform the design of 3D printed scaffolds to ensure their bulk mechanical properties mimic specific target tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Three-dimensional printing; finite element modelling; mechanical properties; scaffold design; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31495233     DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1656720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Connect Tissue Res        ISSN: 0300-8207            Impact factor:   3.417


  6 in total

1.  Macroporous chitosan/methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) based cryosponges with unique morphology for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar; Viness Pillay; Yahya E Choonara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Investigation of the 3D Printability of Covalently Cross-Linked Polypeptide-Based Hydrogels.

Authors:  Johnel Giliomee; Lisa C du Toit; Bert Klumperman; Yahya E Choonara
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Geometry-Based Computational Fluid Dynamic Model for Predicting the Biological Behavior of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Abdalla M Omar; Mohamed H Hassan; Evangelos Daskalakis; Gokhan Ates; Charlie J Bright; Zhanyan Xu; Emily J Powell; Wajira Mirihanage; Paulo J D S Bartolo
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 4.  Nanomaterials in Scaffolds for Periodontal Tissue Engineering: Frontiers and Prospects.

Authors:  Siyang Chen; Xin Huang
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  The Use of 3D Polylactic Acid Scaffolds with Hydroxyapatite/Alginate Composite Injection and Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Laminoplasty Spacers in Rabbits.

Authors:  Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim; Dina Aprilya; Raden Handidwiono; Yudan Whulanza; Ghiska Ramahdita; Tri Kurniawati
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Finite element study of stem cells under fluid flow for mechanoregulation toward osteochondral cells.

Authors:  Mehdi Moradkhani; Bahman Vahidi; Bahram Ahmadian
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.896

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.