Kathrin Becker1,2, Frank Schwarz2, Nicole Jasmin Rauch1, Silava Khalaph1, Ilja Mihatovic3, Dieter Drescher1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 2. Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. 3. Department of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Whereas stationary stability of implants has been postulated for decades, recent studies suggested a phenomenon termed implant migration. This describes a change in position of implants as a reaction to applied forces. The present study aims at employing image registration of in vivo micro-CT scans from different time points and to assess (a) if migration of continuously loaded implants is possible and (b) migration correlates with the force magnitude. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two customized machined implants were placed in the dorsal portion of caudal vertebrae in n = 61 rats and exposed to standardized forces (0.5 N, 1.0 N, and 1.5 N) applied through a flat nickel-titanium contraction spring, or no forces (control). Micro-CT scans were performed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery. The baseline image was registered with the forthcoming scans. Implant migration was measured as the Euclidean distance between implant tips. Bone remodeling was assessed between the baseline and the forthcoming scans. RESULTS: The findings confirmed a positional change of the implants at 2 and 8 weeks of healing, and a linear association between applied force and velocity of movement (anterior implant: χ2 = 12.12, df = 3, and p = .007 and posterior implant: χ2 = 20.35, df = 3, and p < .001). Bone apposition was observed around the implants and accompanied by formation of load-bearing trabeculae and a general cortical thickening close and also distant to the implants. CONCLUSION: The present analysis confirmed that implants can migrate in bone. The applied forces seemed to stimulate bone thickening, which could explain why implants migrate without affecting stability.
OBJECTIVES: Whereas stationary stability of implants has been postulated for decades, recent studies suggested a phenomenon termed implant migration. This describes a change in position of implants as a reaction to applied forces. The present study aims at employing image registration of in vivo micro-CT scans from different time points and to assess (a) if migration of continuously loaded implants is possible and (b) migration correlates with the force magnitude. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two customized machined implants were placed in the dorsal portion of caudal vertebrae in n = 61 rats and exposed to standardized forces (0.5 N, 1.0 N, and 1.5 N) applied through a flat nickel-titanium contraction spring, or no forces (control). Micro-CT scans were performed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery. The baseline image was registered with the forthcoming scans. Implant migration was measured as the Euclidean distance between implant tips. Bone remodeling was assessed between the baseline and the forthcoming scans. RESULTS: The findings confirmed a positional change of the implants at 2 and 8 weeks of healing, and a linear association between applied force and velocity of movement (anterior implant: χ2 = 12.12, df = 3, and p = .007 and posterior implant: χ2 = 20.35, df = 3, and p < .001). Bone apposition was observed around the implants and accompanied by formation of load-bearing trabeculae and a general cortical thickening close and also distant to the implants. CONCLUSION: The present analysis confirmed that implants can migrate in bone. The applied forces seemed to stimulate bone thickening, which could explain why implants migrate without affecting stability.
Authors: Maria Cadenas de Llano-Pérula; Chen Zong; Jeroen Van Dessel; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Guy Willems Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.573